Conclusion: Globalization as Englishization

  • Kwok-kan Tam


Globalization has become a topic of central concern for the twenty-first century, especially in anthropology, communication, sociology, economics, and literary studies. Globalization is still developing and is a reality that has already shown its effects on different parts of the world in newer relations of interconnectedness and interdependence that have to be defined. Various theories of globalization have been proposed since the 1970s to explain, as well as to predict, the trend of development toward homogenization and the tensions thus created. These theories can be summarized as follows:


  1. Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhaǐlovich. 1976. “Discourse in Life and Discourse in Art (Concerning Sociological Poetics.” In Valentin Voloshinov, 93–116. Freudianism: A Marxist Critique, Translated by I. R. Titunik. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, Kimberley. 1995. “World Englishes” To Teach or Not To Teach.” WE: World Englishes, 14, no. 2 (July): 233–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castells, Manuel. 1997. The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Crystal, David. 1997. English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Derrida, Jacques. 1974. Of Grammatology. Translated by Gayatri C. Spivak. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dirlik, Arif. 1996. “The Global in the Local.” In Global/Local: Cultural Production and the Transnational Imaginary, edited by Rob Wilson and Wimal Dissanayake, 21–45. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Featherstone, Mike. 1995. Undoing Culture: Globalization, Postmodernism and Identity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Featherstone, Mike. 1996. “Localism, Globalism, and Cultural Identity.” In Global/Local: Cultural Production and the Transnational Imaginary, edited by Rob Wilson and Wimal Dissanayake, 46–77. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foucault, Michel. 1982. “The Subject and Power.” Translated by Leslie Sawyer. Critical Inquiry, no. 8 (Summer): 777–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  12. Glotz, Peter. 1999. “Information: Digital Capitalism.” Deutschland, no. 6 (December/January): 48–49.Google Scholar
  13. Grabe, William. 1988. “English, Information Access, and Technology Transfer: A Rationale for English as an International Language.” World Englishes 7, no. 1: 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Halliday, Michael A. K. 1978. Language As Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  15. Jameson, Fredric. 1991. Postmodernism, Or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  16. Jameson, Fredric and Masao Miyoshi, eds. 1998. The Cultures of Globalization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kachru, Braj B. 1985. “Standards, Codification, and Sociolinguistic Realism: The English Language in the Outer Circle.” In English in the World: Teaching and Learning of Language and Literature, edited by Randolph Quirk and Henry Widdowson, 11–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kachru, Braj B. 1986. “The Power and Politics of English.” World Englishes 5, nos. 2/3: 121–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kachru, Braj B. 1990. “World Englishes and Applied Linguistics.” World Englishes 9, no. 1: 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kandiah, Thiru. 1998. “Why New Englishes?” In English in New Cultural Contexts, edited by Joseph A. Foley et al., 1–40. Singapore: Singapore Institute of Management and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Luhman, Niklas. 1990. “The World Society as a Social System.” In Essays on Self-Reference, 175–90. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. McArthur, Tom. 1998. The English Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meyer, John. 1987. “Self and the Life Course: Institutionalization and Its Effects.” In Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society and the Individual, edited by George M. Thomas et al., 242–60. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Mignolo, Walter D. 1998. “Globalization, Civilization Processes, and the Relocation of Languages and Cultures.” In The Cultures of Globalization, edited by Fredric Jameson and Masao Miyoshi, 32–53. Durham, NC: Duke University PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Pennycook, Alastair. 1997. “Critical Applied Linguistics and Education.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Vol. 1, edited by Ruth Wodak and David Corsonm, 23–32. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Phillipson, Robert. 1997. “The Politics of English Language Teaching.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Vol. 1, edited by Ruth Wodak and David Corsonm, 201–10. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Robertson, Roland 1989. “Internationalization and Globalization.” University Center for International Studies Newsletter (University of Pittsburgh) (Spring 1989): 8–9.Google Scholar
  28. Robertson, Roland. 1992. Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Von Hardenberg, Irene. 1999. “Knowledge: Where are the Limits?” Deutschland, no. 6 (December/January): 50–51.Google Scholar
  30. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1989. The Modern World-System III: The Second Era of Great Expansion of the Capitalist World-Economy, 1730–1940s. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Waters, Malcolm. 1995. Globalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Widdowson, Henry G. 1997. “EIL, ESL, EFL: Global Issues and Local Interests.” World Englishes 16, no. 1: 135–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wilson, Rob, and Wimal Dissanayake, eds. 1996. Global/Local: Cultural Production and the Transnational Imaginary. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Wu, David Y. H. 1997. “Facing the Challenge of Multiple Cultural Identities.” In Emerging Pluralism in Asia and the Pacific, edited by David Y. H. Wu et al., 141–47. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  35. Zabus, Chantal. 1995. “Relexification.” In The Post-colonial Studies Reader, edited by Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin, 314–18. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Zhao, Yong, and Keith P. Campbell. 1995. “English in China.” World Englishes 14, no. 3: 377–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kwok-kan Tam
    • 1
  1. 1.The Hang Seng University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong

Personalised recommendations