Advertisement

Towards an Investigation of Language Learners’ (Non)Use of Online Technology

  • Shuang ZengEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter orientates the reader to understanding why it is necessary and important to investigate language learners’ actual use of online technology outside the university classroom. Firstly, this chapter introduces the emergence and nature of Web 2.0 technologies. It then sets out to demonstrate the promise of Web 2.0 for language learning and thus the learning opportunities offered by Web 2.0 outside the classroom. Additionally, given the ‘digital native’ rhetoric, many CALL practitioners believe that there is an ongoing change in language learning and that learning practices are increasingly drawn towards the adoption of Web 2.0 technologies outside the classroom. Secondly, this chapter reviews the challenges to this optimistic belief. The scrutiny of these claims and debates has necessitated the focus of the present study on exploring learner-directed out-of-class language learning with the current web. The two central lines of argument are, firstly, whatever claims made about out-of-class language learning are questionable unless they have been levelled against language learners’ actual technology use and behaviours; secondly, if any, the resistance of language learners towards online technologies deserves more subtle investigation, as it may uncover possible barriers to the Web 2.0 transfer.

References

  1. Allford, D., & Pachler, N. (2007). Language, autonomy and the new learning environments. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  2. Alm, A. (2009). Blogging for self-determination with L2 learner Journals. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on web 2.0 and second language learning. London: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, P. (2007). What is web 2.0? Ideas, technologies, and implications for education [Online]. JISC Tech Watch, Available at: http://21stcenturywalton.pbworks.com/f/What%20is%20Web%202.0.pdf. Last accessed July 11, 2011.
  4. Beer, D., & Burrows, R. (2007). Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some initial considerations [Online]. Sociological Research Online, 12, Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/5117.html.
  5. Benito-Ruiz, E. (2009). Infoxication 2.0. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on web 2.0 and second language learning. New York: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benson, P., & Reinders, H. (Eds.). (2011). Beyond the language classroom. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Berners-Lee, T. (1999). Weaving the web. New York: Orion Business.Google Scholar
  9. Biber, D., & Kurjian, J. (2007). Towards a taxonomy of web registers and text types: A multidimensional analysis. Language and Computers, 59(1), 109–130.Google Scholar
  10. Black, R. W. (2005). Access and affiliation: The literacy and composition practices of English-Language learners in an online fan fiction community. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(2), 118–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bloch, J. (2007). Abdullah’s blogging: A generation 1.5 student enters the blogosphere [Online]. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 66–82. Available at: http://llt.msu.edu/vol11num2/bloch/default.html.
  12. Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, second life, and beyond: From production to produsage. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Carney, N. (2009). Blogging in foreign language education. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on web 2.0 and second language learning. New York: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  16. Chamot, A. U. (2001). The role of learning strategies in second language acquisition. In M. P. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  17. Chapelle, C. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on Applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen, X. B. (2013). Tablets for informal language learning: Student usage and attitudes [Online]. Language Learning & Technology, 17(1), 20–36. Available at: http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2013/chenxb.pdf.
  19. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  20. Conole, G., & Alevizou, P. (2010). A literature review of the use of Web 2.0 tools in Higher Education (A report commissioned by the Higher Education Academy) [Online]. Milton Keynes: The Open University. Available at: http://www.jisctechdis.ac.uk/assets/EvidenceNet/Conole_Alevizou_2010.pdf. Last accessed May 6, 2014.
  21. Crook, C. (2008a). What are web 2.0 technologies, and why do they matter? [Online]. In N. Selwyn (Ed.), Education 2.0? Designing the web for teaching and learning. ESRC Teaching and Learning Research Programme commentary. Available at: http://www.tlrp.org/pub/documents/TELcOlmn.pQf. Last accessed July 11, 2011].
  22. Crook, C. (2008b). Web 2.0 technologies for learning: The current landscape opportunities, challenges and tensions [Online]. Coventry: Becta. Available at: http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1474/1/becta_2008_web2_currentlandscape_litrev.pdf. Last accessed August 15, 2011.
  23. Crook, C. (2012). The ‘digital native’ in context: Tensions associated with importing Web 2.0 practices into the school setting. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Danet, B., & Herring, S. C. (2003). Introduction: The multilingual internet [Online]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(1), 0–0. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00354.x/full.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ducate, L., & Lomicka, L. (2008). Adventures in the blogosphere: From blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Elia, D. A. (2007). An analysis of Wikipedia digital writing. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 16–21). Available at: http://www.sics.se/jussi/newtext/. Last accessed April 3, 2010.
  27. Farmer, J. (2004). Communication dynamics: Discussion boards, weblogs and the development of communities of inquiry in online learning environments. In Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 274–283). Available at: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/farmer.html. Last accessed August 10, 2014.
  28. Felix, U. (2003). An orchestrated vision of language learning online. In U. Felix (Ed.), Language learning online: Towards best practice. The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger B.V.Google Scholar
  29. Felix, U. (2008). The unreasonable effectiveness of CALL: What have we learned in two decades of research? [Online]. ReCALL, 20(02), 141–161. Available at: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0958344008000323.
  30. Francis, R. J. (2010). The decentring of the traditional university: The Future of (Self) education in virtually figured worlds. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Godwin-Jones, R. (2008). Emerging technologies: Web-writing 2.0: Enabling, documenting, and assessing writing online [Online]. Language Learning & Technology, 12(2), 7–13. Available at: https://resources.oncourse.iu.edu/access/content/user/mikuleck/Filemanager_Public_Files/L750%20Electronic%20Lang%20and%20Lit/Electronic%20Evaluation/Emerging%20Trends%20Assessing%20Writing%20Online%202008.pdf.
  32. Golder, S. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2), 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gouseti, A. (2010). Web 2.0 and education: Not just another case of hype, hope and disappointment? Learning, Media and Technology, 35(3), 351–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Guerin, E. M. C., Cigognini, M. E., & Pettenati, M. C. (2010). Learner 2.0. In S. Guth & F. Helm (Eds.), Telecollaboration 2.0: Language, literacies and intercultural learning in the 21st century. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  35. Hanson-Smith, E. (2001). Computer-assisted language learning. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Haythomthwaite, C. A., & Andrews, R. (2011). E-learning theory and practice. Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hegelheimer, V., & O’Bryan, A. (2009). Mobile technologies, podcasting, and language education. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on web 2.0 and second language learning. New York: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  38. Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? (Online). British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27739/1/Digital_natives_(LSERO).pdf. Last accessed August 10, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Holliday, A. (2007). Response to ELT and the spirit of the times [Online]. ELT Journal, 61(4), 360–366. Available at: http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hoven, D. (1997). Instructional design for multimedia: Towards a learner-centred CELL (Computer-Enhanced Language Learning) model. In K. A. Murphy-Judy (Ed.), NEXUS: The convergence of language teaching and research using technology. CALICO: Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  41. Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  42. Huffaker, D. (2004). The educated blogger: Using weblogs to promote literacy in the classroom [Online]. First Monday, 9(6). Available at: http://rstmonday.org/. Last accessed August 2, 2010.
  43. Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Macarthur.Google Scholar
  45. Jones, C. (2011). Students, the net generations, and digital natives: Accounting for educational change. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Deconstructing digital natives. New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Kaya, T. (2013). Does ICT teacher training bring benefits to the language classroom? In Proceedings of WorldCALL. Glasgow, 10–13 July 2013 [Online]. Available at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/251232220_Effects_of_online_gaming_experience_on_English_achievement_in_an_MMORPG_learning_environment/file/3deec51ef324086829.pdf#page=138. Last accessed August 11, 2014.
  47. Keen, A. (2007). The Cult of the amateur: How Today's internet is killing our culture. Crown Business.Google Scholar
  48. Keen, A. (2008). The cult of the amateur: How today’s internet is killing our culture and assaulting the economy. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.Google Scholar
  49. Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K. L. (2008). First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kessler, G. (2009). Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based collaborative writing [Online]. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 79–95. Available at: http://llt.msu.edu/vol13num1/vol13num1.pdf?origin=publication_detail#page=86.
  51. Kilgarriff, A., & Grefenstette, G. (2003). Introduction to the special issue on the web as corpus. Computational linguistics, 29(3), 333–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2013). Re-skilling language learners for a mobile world. Monterey, CA: The International Research Foundation for English Language Education. Available at: http://www.tirfonline.org/english-in-the-workforce/mobile-assisted-language-learning/. Last accessed April 10, 2014.
  53. Lai, C. (2014). Perceiving and traversing in-class and out-of-class learning: accounts from foreign language learners in Hong Kong [Online]. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, (ahead-of-print), 1–20. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17501229.2014.918982#.U-LwVHJO6UQ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lai, C., & Zhao, Y. (2005). Introduction: The importance of input and the potential of technology for enhancing input. In Y. Zhao (Ed.), Research in technology and second language education: Developments and directions. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  56. Lee, L. (2009). Promoting intercultural exchanges with blogs and podcasting: A study of Spanish-American telecollaboration. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(5), 425–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lee, L. (2010). Fostering reactive writing and interactive exchange through blogging in an advanced language course. ReCALL, 22(2), 212–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lee, L., & Markey, A. (2014). A study of learners’ perceptions of online intercultural exchange through Web 2.0 technologies [Online]. ReCALL, 1–20. Available at: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0958344014000111.
  59. Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media and mobile Internet use among teens and young adults. Pew Internet & American Life Project [Online]. Available at: http://wenku.baidu.com/link?url=wWjJfjeHLtTvgCz0-kYzxCDcOLhm8mA7tyKfkKGdsEj-YJ3qz5n9ZJSJ4oc8PapvReLXEiJX86YD-i_jQLxK_u9UrGLxHRuKRIP2XWb3Fme. Last accessed September 28, 2014.
  60. Levin, D., & Arafeh, S. (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between Internet-savvy students and their schools (Pew Internet and American Life Project) [Online]. Available at: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED471133.pdf. Last accessed July 10, 2014.
  61. Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. New Jersey: Lawrence Frlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  63. Lin, P. C., Hou, H. T., Wu, S. Y., & Chang, K. E. (2014). Exploring college students’ cognitive processing patterns during a collaborative problem-solving teaching activity integrating Facebook discussion and simulation tools [Online]. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 51–56. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751614000220. Last accessed August 11, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Madden, M., & Fox, S. (2006). Riding the waves of ‘Web 2.0’ [Online]. Pew internet and American life project, 5. Available at: http://clearwww.co-bw.com/Ethics/ethics_Web_2.pdf. Last accessed September 2, 2011.
  65. McCarty, S. (2009). Social networking behind student lines in Japan. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on web 2.0 and second language learning. PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  66. McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2007). ‘Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era’. [Online]. In ICT: Providing Choices for Learners and Learning. Proceedings of ascilite Singapore 2007 (pp. 664–675). Available at: http://www.dlc-ubc.ca/wordpress_dlc_mu/educ500/files/2011/07/mcloughlin.pdf. Last accessed July 31, 2014.
  67. Mishan, F. (2005). Designing authenticity into language learning materials. Oregon: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
  68. Murray, D. E. (2005). Technologies for second language literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 188–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Murray, G. (2008). Pop culture and language learning: Learners’ stories informing EFL. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 2–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Murray, L., & Hourigan, T. (2006). Using micropublishing to facilitate writing in the foreign language. In L. Ducate & N. Arnold (Eds.), Calling on CALL: From theory to research to new directions in foreign language teaching. CALICAO monograph series: Texas.Google Scholar
  71. Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005). Is it age or IT: First steps towards understanding the net generation [Online]. In D. Oblinger & J. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the net generation. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE. Available at: http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/bookshelf/272/. Last accessed August 10, 2014.
  72. Oladi, S. (2005). Study of Tehran medical students’ social interaction in cyber blogging environment and its effect on IELTS writing proficiency. Unpublished master book. Tehran University.Google Scholar
  73. O’Reilly, T. (2009). What is web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software [Online]. O’Reilly Media, Inc. Available at: http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=NpEk_WFCMdIC&oi=fnd&pg=PT3&dq=O%27reilly&ots=OYLFSblBLX&sig=2ub3PSOjj-q0XmSMnU3F8kmvM6k#v=onepage&q=O’reilly&f=false. Last accessed December 10, 2011.
  74. Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2011). Meeting at the wiki—The new arena for collaborative writing in foreign language courses. In M. J. Lee & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-based e-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching. PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  75. Pachler, N., Bachmair, B., Cook, J., & Kress, G. (2010). Mobile learning. Boston, MA: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Payne, J. S., & Ross, B. M. (2005). Synchronous CMC, working memory, and L2 oral proficiency development [Online]. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 35–54. Available at: http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num3/payne/default.html.
  77. Pedró, F. (2008). New millennium learners: A project in progress [Online]. Available at: http://www.indire.it/db/docsrv/acqua/NML.pdf. Last accessed August 10, 2014.
  78. Peyton, J. K. (1999). Theory and research: Interactive via computers. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues. TESOL: Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
  79. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1 [Online]. On the horizon, 9(5), 1–6. Available at: http://www.nnstoy.org/download/technology/Digital%20Natives%20-%20Digital%20Immigrants.pdf. Last accessed July 20, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Prensky, M. (2011). Digital wisdom and homo sapiens digital. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Deconstructing digital natives. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Raith, T. (2009). The use of weblogs in language education. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on web 2.0 and second language learning. New York: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  82. Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2007). Top of the pods—In search of a podcasting ‘pedagogy’ for language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(5), 471–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Seipold, J., & Pachler, N. (2011). Evaluating mobile learning practice [Online]. MedienPädagogik–Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung, 19. Available at: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=9393710801087813739&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5. Last accessed July 10, 2013.
  84. Selwyn, N. (2003). Apart from technology: Understanding people’s non-use of information and communication technologies in everyday life. Technology in Society, 25(1), 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Selwyn, N. (2009a). The digital native—Myth and reality [Online]. Aslib Proceedings, 61(4), 364–379. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/00012530910973776. Last accessed August 5, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Selwyn, N. (2009b). Faceworking: Exploring students’ education-related use of Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Selwyn, N. (2011). Schools and schooling in the digital age: A critical analysis. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  88. Sheaffer-Jones, C. (2000). Designing a community learning environment using a bulletin board system: A trial with advanced French written communication. In T. Lewis & A. Rouxeville (Eds.), Technology and the advanced language learner. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.Google Scholar
  89. Solomon, G., & Schrum, L. (2007). Web 2.0: New tools, new schools. Washington: International Society for Technology in Education.Google Scholar
  90. Steel, C. H., & Levy, M. (2013). Language students and their technologies: Charting the evolution 2006–2011 [Online]. ReCALL, 25(03), 306–320. Available at: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8971762&fileId=S0958344013000128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Stockwell, G. (Ed.). (2012). Computer-assisted language learning: Diversity in research and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Sturm, M., Kennell, T., McBride, R., & Kelly, M. (2009). The pedagogical implication for Web 2.0. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on web 2.0 and second language learning. PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  93. Sun, Y. (2009). Voice blog: An exploratory study of language learning [Online]. Language Learning & Technology, 13(2), 88–103. Available at: http://llt.msu.edu/vol13num2/sun.pdf.
  94. Sykes, M. J., Oskoz, A., & Thorne, S. L. (2008). Web 2.0, synthetic immersive environments, and mobile resources for language education [Online]. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 528–546. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca/CALICO/index.php/calico/article/view/794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tapscott, D. (2008). Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world HC. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  96. Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. (2010). Innovating the 21st century university: It’s time. EDUCAUSE Review, 45(1), 17–29.Google Scholar
  97. Taylor, C. (1985). Human agency and language. Philosophical Papers (Vol. 1). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Thomas, M. (Ed.). (2009). Handbook of research on web 2.0 and second language learning. PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  99. Thomas, M. (Ed.). (2011). Deconstructing digital natives. New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  100. Toffoli, D., & Sockett, G. (2010). How non-specialist students of English practice informal learning using web 2.0 tools [Online]. ASp. la revue du GERAS, (58), 125–144. Available at: http://ww.w.asp.revues.org/1851.
  101. Travis, P., & Joseph, F. (2009). Improving learners’ speaking skills with podcasts. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on web 2.0 and second language learning. PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  102. Ullrich, C., Borau, K., Luo, H., Tan, X., Shen, L., & Shen, R. (2008). Why Web 2.0 is good for learning and for research: principles and prototypes. [Online]. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 705–714). Available at: http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/58/87/57/PDF/ULLRICH-CARSTEN-2008.pdf [Last accessed 13th August, 2011].
  103. Vallance, M., Vallance, K., & Matsui, M. (2009). Criteria for the implementation of learning technologies. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on web 2.0 and second language learning. PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  104. Wang, S., & Vásquez, C. (2012). Web 2.0 and second language learning: What does the research tell us? [Online]. Calico Journal, 29(3), 412–430. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca/CALICO/index.php/calico/article/viewFile/25/35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and Practice. Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 470–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic Literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  107. Warschauer, M. (2005). Sociocultural perspectives on CALL. In J. L. Egbert & G. M. Petrie (Eds.), CALL research perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  108. Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2007). Audience, authorship and artefact: The emergent semiotics of Web 2.0. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Winke, P., & Goertler, S. (2008). Did we forget someone? Students’ computer access and literacy for CALL [Online]. Calico Journal, 25(3), 482–509. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca/CALICO/index.php/calico/article/download/792/653.
  110. Wu, S., Franken, M., & Witten, I. H. (2009). Refining the use of the web (and web search) as a language teaching and learning resource. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(3), 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Shanghai for Science and TechnologyShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations