Structural Equation Modeling with Path Analysis: Antecedents of Corporate Commitment to Sustainable Tourism

  • Jung Wan LeeEmail author
Part of the Perspectives on Asian Tourism book series (PAT)


The chapter demonstrates an application of structural equation modeling (SEM) and path analysis (PA) in tourism research, and the associated statistics are described. First, we discuss the basic concepts of SEM, followed by an explanation of the key statistics and terms associated with this procedure. Then we describe the procedure for conducting SEM, including second-order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Finally, we describe the related technique of path analysis. In doing so, this chapter provides an example of structural equation modeling with a path model, of which path analysis assumes that all variables are measured without error so that it has a more restrictive set of assumptions than general structural equation models. The study examines antecedents of corporate commitment to sustainable tourism and corporate environmental responsibility in a country in Asia. The study employs factor analysis (i.e., exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and internal consistency reliability tests) and structural equation modeling analysis and path analysis (i.e., the analysis of moment structures and regression analysis) using 386 samples collected from tourism employees in South Korea.


Structural equation model Path analysis Factor analysis Internal consistency reliability tests Corporate environmental responsibility Organizational behavior Stakeholder theory Tourism research Korea 


  1. Arikan, E., Kantur, D., & Telci, E. E. (2015). Investigating the mediating role of corporate reputation on the relationship between corporate environmental responsibility and multiple stakeholder outcomes. Quality and Quantity, 50(1), 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartholomew, D. J. (1996). The statistical approach to environmental measurement. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  3. Bartoshuk, L. M., Fast, K., & Snyder, D. J. (2005). Differences in our sensory worlds: Invalid comparisons with labeled scales. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(3), 122–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basilevsky, A. (1994). Statistical factor analysis and related methods. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bastič, M., & Gojčič, S. (2012). Measurement scale for eco-component of hotel service quality. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(3), 1012–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benavides-Velasco, C. A., Quintana-García, C., & Marchante-Lara, M. (2014). Total quality management, corporate environmental responsibility and performance in the hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 41(August), 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bohdanowicz, P. (2006). Environmental awareness and initiatives in the Swedish and Polish hotel industries – Survey results. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 25(4), 662–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate environmental responsibility to organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1701–1719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chan, E. S. W., & Hawkins, R. (2012). Application of EMSs in a hotel context: A case study. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(2), 405–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chan, E. S. W., Hon, A. H. Y., Chan, W., & Okumus, F. (2014). What drives employees’ intentions to implement green practices in hotels? The role of knowledge, awareness, concern and ecological behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 40(July), 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Christmann, P. (2004). Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy standardization. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 747–760.Google Scholar
  12. Dawes, J. G. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delgado-Ceballos, J., Aragón-Correa, J. A., Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., & Rueda-Manzanares, A. (2012). The effect of internal barriers on the connection between stakeholder integration and proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunn, G. (1989). Design and analysis of reliability studies: The statistical evaluation of measurement errors. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Etzion, D. (2007). Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992 – Present: A review. Journal of Management, 33(4), 637–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fu, H., Ye, B. H., & Law, R. (2014). You do well and I do well? The behavioral consequences of corporate environmental responsibility. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 40(July), 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. González-Benito, J., & González-Benito, O. (2006). A review of determinant factors of environmental proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(2), 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grosbois, D. (2012). Corporate environmental responsibility reporting by the global hotel industry: Commitment, initiatives and performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(3), 896–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guay, T., Doh, J. P., & Sinclair, G. (2004). Non-governmental organizations, shareholder activism, and environmentally responsible investments: Ethical, strategic, and governance implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heisterkamp, M. (2009). Guests expect more from green programs. Hotel Management. Available from: Accessed 18 Jan 2015.
  21. Huang, C. L., & Kung, F. H. (2010). Drivers of environmental disclosure and stakeholder expectation: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kang, K. H., Stein, L., Heo, C. Y., & Lee, S. (2012). Consumers’ willingness to pay for green initiatives of the hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(2), 564–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim, Y. M., & Lee, K. N. (2011). A study on the driving factors of green physical distribution and its subsequent impact on environmental and economic performance. Journal of the Korean Academy of International Commerce, 26(3), 91–109.Google Scholar
  24. Kim, T. H., & Yoo, S. G. (2012). A study on the green growth and government support on green physical distribution. Journal of the Korea Association for International Commerce and Information, 14(1), 315–344.Google Scholar
  25. Kucukusta, D., Mak, A., & Chan, X. (2013). Corporate environmental responsibility practices in four and five-star hotels: Perspectives from Hong Kong visitors. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 34(September), 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuvan, Y., & Akan, P. (2012). Conflict and agreement in stakeholder attitudes: Residents’ and hotel managers’ views of tourism impacts and forest-related tourism development. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20(4), 571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, S. (2008). Drivers for the participation of small and medium sized suppliers in green supply chain initiatives. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(3), 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lin, C. Y., & Ho, Y. H. (2011). Determinants of green practice adoption for logistics companies in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. López-Gamero, M. D., Claver-Cortés, E., & Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2011). Environmental perception, management, and competitive opportunity in Spanish Hotels. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 52(4), 480–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Malhotra, N. K. (2010). Marketing research: An applied orientation (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.Google Scholar
  31. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  32. Park, J., & Kim, H. J. (2014). Environmental proactivity of hotel operations: Antecedents and the moderating effect of ownership type. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 37(February), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rahman, I., Reynolds, D., & Svaren, S. (2012). How “green” are North American hotels? An exploration of low-cost adoption practices. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(3), 720–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sarkis, J., Gonzalez-Torre, P., & Adenso-Diaz, B. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training. Journal of Operation Management, 28(2), 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Singh, N., Cranage, D., & Lee, S. (2014). Green strategies for hotels: Estimation of recycling benefits. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 43(October), 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stawiski, S., Deal, J. J., & Gentry, W. (2010). Employee perceptions of corporate environmental responsibility: The implications for your organization. Greensboro: The Center for Creative Leadership.Google Scholar
  37. The Science and Technology Policy Institute of Korea. (2011). A study on the practice and adoption of green innovation in business sectors (Science, Technology & Innovation Policy Report No. DT-395N-2010090). Available from: Accessed 18 Jan 2014.
  38. Thijssens, T., Bollen, L., & Hassink, H. (2015). Secondary stakeholder influence on CSR disclosure: An application of stakeholder salience theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 873–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tsai, H., Tsang, N. K. F., & Cheng, S. K. Y. (2012). Hotel employees’ perceptions on corporate environmental responsibility: The case of Hong Kong. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(4), 1143–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Uecker-Mercado, H., & Walker, M. (2012). The value of environmental responsibility to facility managers: Revealing the perceptions and motives for adopting ESR. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(3), 260–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vasi, I. B., & King, B. G. (2012). Environmental movements, risk perceptions, and economic outcomes: The effect of primary and secondary stakeholder activism of firms perceived environmental risk and financial performance. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Administrative Sciences Department, Metropolitan CollegeBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations