Advertisement

Ethical Considerations in Quantitative Tourism and Hospitality Researches

  • Maryam Emami
  • Sajad Rezaei
  • Behrooz Sangani
  • See-Kwong Goh
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives on Asian Tourism book series (PAT)

Abstract

Research ethics is an extremely important part of every study. Tourism scholars receive guidance on ethical issues in research from different sources throughout their careers such as experiences from participation in research activities, quantitative data analysis or research methods methodology courses, short trainings, workshops, professional readings, and involving in peer-review processes. However, in a structured quantitative context, such as tourism and hospitality, the acquaintances and relationships between the research philosophy, design, and analysis choices related to research ethics are largely implicit and informal. That is, methodology scholars and research advisors might convey ethical principles and conducts about research design and data analysis, by reporting experientially and by modeling appropriate professional behavior. Thus, this chapter aims to provide a practical review of ethical issues in quantitative methods in tourism and hospitality researches. More specifically, this chapter focuses on several potential issues that might emerge in conducting research methods in tourism context. Data collection method and questionnaire design in this regard are considered as practical examples. Moreover, based on the principles of ethical issues in behavioral research, this chapter proposes and offers substantial guides in anticipating ethics in tourism and hospitality research.

Keywords

Quantitative research Business ethic Tourism researchers 

References

  1. AAPOR. (2015, November). American Association for Public Opinion Research code of ethics. Retrieved from https://www.aapor.org/Standards-Ethics/AAPOR-Code-of-Ethics.aspx
  2. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Millsap, R. E. (2008). Doctoral training in statistics, measurement, and methodology in psychology: Replication and extension of Aiken, West, Sechrest, and Reno’s (1990) survey of PhD programs in North America. American Psychologist, 63(1), 32.Google Scholar
  3. Albaum, G., Wiley, J., Roster, C., & Smith, S. M. (2011). Visiting item non-responses in internet survey data collection. International Journal of Market Research, 53(5), 687–703.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, G. N., Burk, D. L., & Davis, G. B. (2006). Academic data collection in electronic environments: Defining acceptable use of internet resources. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 599–610.Google Scholar
  5. Ariffin, A. A. M. (2013). Generic dimensionality of hospitality in the hotel industry: A host–guest relationship perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 35(0), 171–179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.06.002.Google Scholar
  6. Ariffin, A. A. M., & Maghzi, A. (2012). A preliminary study on customer expectations of hotel hospitality: Influences of personal and hotel factors. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(1), 191–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.04.012.Google Scholar
  7. Befring, E. (2015, November 03). Quantitative methods. Retrieved from https://www.etikkom.no/en/library/introduction/methods-and-approaches/quantitative-methods/
  8. Behi, R., & Nolan, M. (1995). Ethical issues in research. British Journal of Nursing, 4(12), 712–716.Google Scholar
  9. Bernard, H. R. (2017). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  10. Boyer, K. K., Olson, J. R., Calantone, R. J., & Jackson, E. C. (2002). Print versus electronic surveys: A comparison of two data collection methodologies. Journal of Operations Management, 20(4), 357–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00004-9.Google Scholar
  11. Chris Paxson, M. (2009). Boomer boom for hospitality: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 18(1), 89–98.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19368620801989360.Google Scholar
  12. Chung, L. H., & Parker, L. D. (2010). Managing social and environmental action and accountability in the hospitality industry: A Singapore perspective. Accounting Forum, 34(1), 46–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2009.10.003.Google Scholar
  13. Davidov, E., & Depner, F. (2011). Testing for measurement equivalence of human values across online and paper-and-pencil surveys. Quality & Quantity, 45(2), 375–390.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9297-9.Google Scholar
  14. Dopson, L. R., & Nelson, A. A. (2003). Future of hotel education: Required program content areas for graduates of US hospitality programs beyond the year 2000–part two. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 15(3), 11–17.Google Scholar
  15. Duffy, R., & Smith, M. (2004). The ethics of tourism development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Eusebio, S., Jr., Joao Luiz, B., & Stuart, J. B. (2004). Developing automated e-survey and control tools: An application in industrial management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 104(3), 189–200.Google Scholar
  17. Eysenbach, G., & Till, J. E. (2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. BMJ, 323(7321), 1103–1105.Google Scholar
  18. Fennell, D. (2013). The ethics of excellence in tourism research. Journal of Travel Research, 52(4), 417–425.Google Scholar
  19. Fennell, D. A., & Malloy, D. (2007). Codes of ethics in tourism: Practice, theory, synthesis (Vol. 33). Clevedon: Channel View Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Finn, A., Wang, L., & Frank, T. (2009). Attribute perceptions, customer satisfaction and intention to recommend E-services. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(3), 209–220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2009.04.006.Google Scholar
  21. Frankel, M. S. (1989). Professional codes: Why, how, and with what impact? Journal of Business Ethics, 8(2–3), 109–115.Google Scholar
  22. Frechtling, D. C. (2004). Assessment of tourism/hospitality journals’ role in knowledge transfer: An exploratory study. Journal of Travel Research, 43(2), 100–107.Google Scholar
  23. Frechtling, D. C. (2017). On the ethics of tourism research. Journal of Travel Research, 004728751772975.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287517729756.Google Scholar
  24. Freese, J. (2007). Replication standards for quantitative social science: Why not sociology? Sociological Methods & Research, 36(2), 153–172.Google Scholar
  25. Heath, M., & Stewart, A. (2003). A comparison of online and postal data collection methods in marketing research. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 21(2), 85–95.Google Scholar
  26. Hobson, J. S. P., & Teaff, J. D. (1994). Hospitality and leisure/recreation. Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing, 2(1), 43–54.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J150v02n01_05.Google Scholar
  27. James, B. W., Vallen, H., Gerald, A., & Peter, T. (2009). Selecting techniques for use in an internet survey. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 21(4), 455–474.Google Scholar
  28. Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (1999). Research methodology: Taming the cyber frontier. Social Science Computer Review, 17(3), 323–337.  https://doi.org/10.1177/089443939901700307.Google Scholar
  29. Knani, M. (2014). Ethics in the hospitality industry: Review and research agenda. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(3), 1.Google Scholar
  30. Köseoglu, M. A., Sehitoglu, Y., Ross, G., & Parnell, J. A. (2016). The evolution of business ethics research in the realm of tourism and hospitality: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(8), 1598–1621.Google Scholar
  31. Lee, L. Y.-S., & Tsang, N. K. (2013). Perceptions of tourism and hotel management students on ethics in the workplace. Journal of teaching in travel & tourism, 13(3), 228–250.Google Scholar
  32. Lovelock, B., & Lovelock, K. (2013). The ethics of tourism: Critical and applied perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. MacCannell, D. (2012). On the ethical stake in tourism research. Tourism Geographies, 14(1), 183–194.Google Scholar
  34. Malhotra, N., & Krosnick, J. A. (2007). The effect of survey mode and sampling on inferences about political attitudes and behavior: Comparing the 2000 and 2004 ANES to internet surveys with nonprobability samples. Political Analysis, 15(3), 286–323.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpm003.Google Scholar
  35. Malloy, D. C., & Fennell, D. A. (1998). Codes of ethics and tourism: An exploratory content analysis. Tourism Management, 19(5), 453–461.Google Scholar
  36. Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2015). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the Aoir ethics working committee (version 2.0). Association of Internet Researchers, 2012.Google Scholar
  37. Martin, L., & Dirk, J. S. (2009). Internet research differs from research on internet users: Some methodological insights into online travel research. Tourism Review, 64(1), 32–47.Google Scholar
  38. McLean, D. (1993). Ethics in hospitality management: Edited by Stephen SJ Hall. Educational Institute of the American Hotel and Motel Association (PO Box 1240, East Lansing MI 48826, USA) ISBN 0-86612-067-x, 1992, viii+ 285 pp.(exhibits, bibliography) $27.96. Annals of Tourism Research, 20(2), 384–388.Google Scholar
  39. McMellon, C. A., & Schiffman, L. G. (2001). Cybersenior research: A practical approach to data collection. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(4), 46–55.  https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.1022.Google Scholar
  40. Moscardo, G. (2010). Tourism research ethics: Current considerations and future options. Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Panter, A. T., & Sterba, S. K. (2011). Handbook of ethics in quantitative methodology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Park, I., Cho, J., & Rao, H. R. (2012). The effect of pre- and post-service performance on consumer evaluation of online retailers. Decision Support Systems, 52(2), 415–426.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.001.Google Scholar
  43. Payne, J., & Barnfather, N. (2012). Online data collection in developing nations: An investigation into sample Bias in a sample of south African university students. Social Science Computer Review, 30(3), 389–397.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439311407419.Google Scholar
  44. Poria, Y., & Timothy, D. J. (2014). Where are the children in tourism research? Annals of Tourism Research, 47, 93–95.Google Scholar
  45. Ryan, C. (2005). Ethics in tourism research: Objectivities and personal perspectives. In Tourism research methods: Integrating theory with practice (pp. 9–19). Cambridge, MA: CABI.Google Scholar
  46. Sethuraman, R., Kerin, R. A., & Cron, W. L. (2005). A field study comparing online and offline data collection methods for identifying product attribute preferences using conjoint analysis. Journal of Business Research, 58(5), 602–610.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.09.009.Google Scholar
  47. Shiu, E. C. C., & Dawson, J. A. (2004). Comparing the impacts of internet technology and national culture on online usage and purchase from a four-country perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 11(6), 385–394.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2003.12.004.Google Scholar
  48. Sills, S. J., & Song, C. (2002). Innovations in survey research. Social Science Computer Review, 20(1), 22–30.  https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930202000103.Google Scholar
  49. Stieger, S., & Reips, U.-D. (2010). What are participants doing while filling in an online questionnaire: A paradata collection tool and an empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1488–1495.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.013.Google Scholar
  50. Teng, C.-C. (2011). Commercial hospitality in restaurants and tourist accommodation: Perspectives from international consumer experience in Scotland. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(4), 866–874.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.01.007.Google Scholar
  51. Thirumalai, S., & Sinha, K. K. (2011). Customization of the online purchase process in electronic retailing and customer satisfaction: An online field study. Journal of Operations Management, 29(5), 477–487.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.11.009.Google Scholar
  52. Turunen, M., Paanala, A., Villman, J., Nevalainen, A., & Haverinen-Shaughnessy, U. (2010). Evaluating housing quality, health and safety using an internet-based data collection and response system: A cross-sectional study. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, 9, 69–69.Google Scholar
  53. WAPOR. (2011, December 1). World Association for Public Opinion Research code of ethics. Retrieved from https://wapor.org/about-wapor/code-of-ethics/
  54. Wasserman, R. (2013). Ethical issues and guidelines for conducting data analysis in psychological research. Ethics & Behavior, 23(1), 3–15.Google Scholar
  55. Wharton, C. M., Hampl, J. S., Hall, R., & Winham, D. M. (2003). PCs or paper-and-pencil: Online surveys for data collection. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 103(11), 1458–1459.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2003.09.004.Google Scholar
  56. Wilkins, H., Merrilees, B., & Herington, C. (2009). The determinants of loyalty in hotels. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 19(1), 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19368620903327626.Google Scholar
  57. Wilkinson, L. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54(8), 594.Google Scholar
  58. Willis, P. (2012). Talking sexuality online – Technical, methodological and ethical considerations of online research with sexual minority youth. Qualitative Social Work, 11(2), 141–155.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325011400488.Google Scholar
  59. Yeh, R. (2012). Hotel general managers’ perceptions of business ethics education: Implications for hospitality educators, professionals, and students. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 11(1), 72–86.Google Scholar
  60. Yetter, G., & Capaccioli, K. (2010). Differences in responses to web and paper surveys among school professionals. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 266–272.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maryam Emami
    • 1
  • Sajad Rezaei
    • 2
  • Behrooz Sangani
    • 3
  • See-Kwong Goh
    • 4
  1. 1.Enterprise Change, Infosys ConsultingHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Universität HamburgHamburgGermany
  3. 3.Department of ManagementPayame Noor UniversityTehranIran
  4. 4.Taylor’s Business SchoolTaylor’s UniversitySubang JayaMalaysia

Personalised recommendations