Advertisement

Interactive Participation Under a Fragmented Administration System: Watershed Governance in Zhejiang Province, China

  • Guohan LiuEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on several types of participatory mechanism currently observed in watershed management in Zhejiang Province. The watershed roundtable mechanism is a new mechanism with aims similar to that used for Taihu Lake Basin initiated by an expert team; however, there are now diverse types of roundtable meetings in the province. In particular, after the provincial water policy called the Five Water Collaborative Governance was issued, new forms of roundtable meetings have been launched. The Our Water Roundtable, which was organized by an environmental nongovernmental organization (NGO) in Hangzhou City, and the Tie Sha River roundtable, organized by an environmental voluntary group founded by the Environmental Protection Bureau and the Communist Youth League of Hangzhou City, focused on the river issues. This chapter discusses how to lead successful interactive participation, which means one interactive form emerged in this region, beyond the consultative authoritarianism in China, and reviews the processes and characteristics of these roundtables.

Keywords

Interactive governance Watershed governance Environment participation Fragmented administration system Roundtable mechanism Co-governance Undemocratic regime Zhejiang Province China 

References

  1. Cai, Yongsheng. 2004. Managed Participation in China. Political Science Quarterly 119: 425–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Claudia Pahl-Wostl, Claudia. 2015. Water Governance in the Face of Global Change: From Understanding to Transformation. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Imura, Hidefumi. 2007. Environmental Issues in China Today: A View from Japan. Tokyo: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Mark Lubell, Mark, and Jurian Edelenbos. 2013. Integrated Water Resources Management: A Comparative Laboratory for Water Governance. International Journal of Water Governance 1 (3): 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Morton, Lois Wright Morton, and Susan S. Brown. 2011. Pathways for Getting to Better Water Quality: The Citizen Effect. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Teets, Jessica C. 2014. Civil Society Under Authoritarianism: The China Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Teisman, Geert, and Jurian Edelenbos Geert. 2013. Editorial Note on Special Issue on Integrated Water Resources Management. International Journal of Water Governance 1: 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. World Health Organization. 2008. Safer Water, Better Health: Costs, Benefits, and Sustainability of Interventions to Protect and Promote Health. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2008/9789241596435_eng.pdf
  9. World Water Council. 2016. World Water Council 20 Years of Achievement (1996–2016). http://www.worldwatercouncil.org/fileadmin/world_water_council/documents/publications/20161128_WWC_book_20years_of_achievement.pdf
  10. Yang, Xuedong. 2012. A Pressure System: A Brief History of a Concept. Social Science 2012 (11): 4–12. in Chinese.Google Scholar
  11. Yu, Wei. 2015. China’s Public Participation in Environment Protection. Beijing: China Environment Publishing House. in Chinese.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Law and Politics SchoolZhejiang Sci-Tech UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations