Academic Frameworks for Formal School Education and ESD Principles

  • Stephanie LederEmail author
Part of the Education for Sustainability book series (EDFSU)


This chapter uses a didactic framework to explore the extent to which India’s educational frameworks reflect the principles of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). Syllabi and textbook analyses serve as an important backdrop for understanding how classroom teaching is structured and for outlining the limitations to achieve ESD objectives. The results show that the pedagogic principles in the National Curriculum Framework (NCF) promote critical thinking and environmental action in line with ESD. However, national school syllabi and geography textbooks and syllabi (NCERT and MSCERT) mostly emphasize reproductive pedagogic practice which emphasizes memorization rather than bringing forth the greater transformative potential of ESD principles. A detailed textbook analysis on the topic of “water” demonstrates that teaching content and methods hardly relate to six ESD dimensions, namely social, environmental, and economic sustainability, as well as didactic principles of argumentation, network thinking, and student orientation. Geography syllabi and textbooks display a fragmented, fact-oriented, and definition-oriented approach. Water resources are presented as a fixed commodity, and unequal access to water is not depicted as socially constructed. Differing perspectives on water access in the students’ urban and rural environment are not presented. This contradicts ESD principles, which favor a problem-based, integrated, and skill-oriented approach to topics at the human–environment interface. The applied ESD framework offers entry points for integrating ESD in textbooks and syllabi through the selection, sequencing, pacing, and evaluation of knowledge and skills.


  1. Advani, S. (2004). Pedagogy and politics: The case of English textbooks. In A. Vaugier-Chatterjee (Ed.), Education and Democracy in India. New Delhi: Manohar Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Bernstein, B. (1975). Class, codes and control. Towards a theory of educational transmission (Vol. III). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, B. (1990). Class, codes and control. The structuring of pedagogic discourse (Vol. IV). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bharati Vidyapeeth Institute of Environment Education and Research. (2002). Study of status of infusion of environmental concepts in school curricula and the effectiveness of its delivery.Google Scholar
  5. Budke, A. (2010). Und der Zukunft abgewandt - Ideologische Erziehung im Geographieunterricht der DDR. Göttingen: V&R unipress.Google Scholar
  6. Crossley, M., & Murby, M. (1994). Textbook provision and the quality of the school curriculum in developing countries: Issues and policy options. Comparative Education, 30(2), 99–114. Scholar
  7. Gottlob, M. (2007). Changing concepts of identity in the Indian textbook controversy. Internationale Schulbuchforschung—International Textbook Research, 29(4), 341–353.Google Scholar
  8. Kumar, K. (1988). Origins of India’s “Textbook culture”. Comparative Education Review, 32(4), 452–464. Scholar
  9. National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2004). Curriculum framework for teacher education. New Delhi: NCERT.Google Scholar
  10. National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2005). National curriculum framework 2005. New Delhi: NCERT.Google Scholar
  11. National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2006). National curriculum framework 2005. Syllabus for classes at the elementary level (Vol. I). New Delhi: NCERT.Google Scholar
  12. National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2009). National curriculum framework 2005. Position papers on national focus groups on systemic reform (Vol. II). New Delhi: NCERT.Google Scholar
  13. Pal, Y. (1993). Learning without burden. New Delhi: Ministry of Human Ressource Development, Government of India.Google Scholar
  14. Rinschede, G. (2005). Geographiedidaktik. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
  15. Spitzer, M. (2007). Lernen. Gehirnforschung und die Schule des Lebens. Berlin: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. World Health Organization (2001). Skills for health. Accessed Mar 10,2014.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CologneCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations