Advertisement

Semantic Network Modelling and the Integrated Local Environmental Knowledge Simulator

  • Shion Takemura
  • Hiroshi Miki
  • Kei Tokita
Chapter
Part of the Ecological Research Monographs book series (ECOLOGICAL)

Abstract

In this chapter we describe construction of our boundary object, called the Integrated Local Environmental Knowledge Simulator (“ILEK-SIM”), to promote dialog and collective thinking between people to solve their local environmental problems using information obtained from various case studies which we have collected throughout the world. In the ILEK-SIM automatic processing techniques are introduced to evaluate the similarity between case studies and reconstruct information by analyzing the GIS data concerning environmental and social conditions and text data obtained in the case studies. The users of the ILEK-SIM can obtain information about various cases similar to those in their local communities from the case studies accumulated in the ILEK-SIM, and make well-balanced decisions and take actions through communication with the members of their community. The concept of the ILEK-SIM and the relevant case studies have been generated and refined through the collaborative knowledge production with ILEK project members who have functioned as bilateral knowledge translators throughout the world.

References

  1. Alexandridis K, Takemura S, Webb A, Lausche B, Culter J, Sato T (2018) Semantic knowledge network inference across a range of stakeholders and communities of practice. Environ Model Softw 109:202–222.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bundy A, Chuenpagdee R, Cooley SR, Defeo O, Glaeser B, Guillotreau P, Isaacs M, Mitsutaku M, Perry RI (2016) A decision support tool for response to global change in marine systems: the IMBER-ADApT (assessment based on description and responses, and appraisal for a typology) framework. Fish Fish 17:1183–1193Google Scholar
  3. Cash D, Clark W, Alcock F, Dickson N, Eckley N, Jäger J (2002) Salience, credibility, legitimacy and boundaries: linking research, assessment and decision making. KSG Working Papers Series, RWP02–046Google Scholar
  4. Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:8086–8091CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Guston DH (2001) Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Sci Technol Hum Values 26:399–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Integrated Local Environmental Knowledge (ILEK) Project (2013) Integrated local environmental knowledge database. https://ilekdb.org/ILEKDB/ActivitySelect.aspx. Accessed 9 July 2015
  7. Makino M, Hirota M, Machiguchi Y (2011) An application of the management tool box to coastal fisheries – a case of sea cucumber fisheries (管理ツールボックスを用いた沿岸漁業管理の考察-ナマコの場合-). Fisheries biology and oceanography in the Kuroshio 12:25–39 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  8. SESMAD (2014) Social-ecological systems meta-analysis database: background and research methods. http://sesmad.dartmouth.edu/. Accessed 9 July 2015
  9. White DD, Wutich A, Larson KL, Gober P, Lant T, Senneville C (2010) Credibility, salience, and legitimacy of boundary objects: water managers’ assessment of a simulation model in an immersive decision theater. Sci Public Policy 37:219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References for Box 19.1

  1. Ai D, Zheng Y, Zhang D (2010) Automatic text summarization based on latent semantic indexing. Artificial Life and Robotics 15(1):25–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) (2005) Gridded Population of the World, Version 3 (GPWv3): population grids. SEDAC, Columbia University, New York. http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/gpw. Accessed 9 July 2015
  3. Clarke KC (1997) Getting started with geographic information systems. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  4. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Iwao K, Nishida K, Kinoshita T, Yamagata Y (2006) Validating land cover maps with degree confluence project information. Geophys Res Lett 33:L23404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Johnson TM, Grim BJ (eds) (2008) World religion database. Brill, Leiden/Boston. https://worldmap.harvard.edu/data/geonode:wrd_province_religion_qg0. Accessed 9 July 2015
  7. NTT DATA Corporation (2016) pg_bigm. http://pgbigm.osdn.jp/index.html. Accessed 9 July 2015
  8. PostGIS Project (2016.) http://postgis.net. Accessed 9 July 2015
  9. UNDP (2013) HDI Report 2013. http://hdr.undp.org/en/2013-report. Accessed 9 July 2015

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute for Humanity and NatureKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Japan Fisheries Research and Education AgencyYokohamaJapan
  3. 3.Kyushu Techno CollegeKitakyushuJapan
  4. 4.Nagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations