Using Computer Simulation for Effective Tsunami Risk Communication

  • Michinori HatayamaEmail author
  • Fuko Nakai
Part of the Integrated Disaster Risk Management book series (IDRM)


With the lessons learned in the Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011, the Japanese Cabinet Office recalculated some existing disaster assumptions. As a result, the Nankai Trough has been assessed as being at risk for a huge earthquake and tsunami. Evacuation plans have been reconsidered in each Japanese administrative sector to be more practical for saving resident’s lives. However, two problems arise concerning tsunami evacuation planning. First, such a disaster creates an infinitely complex situation because of the many factors involved. Second, it is difficult to verify whether any plans will actually work. Therefore, we cannot fully demonstrate the feasibility of these plans. To cope with these difficulties, computer simulation is well known as an effective way to verify plans. In this chapter, an effective process to propose feasible options on tsunami evacuation for residents by combining two approaches will be discussed. The first is a computer simulation that calculates a large variety of evacuation situations to find their most effective behaviors. The second proposes practical methods for testing the behaviors proposed by the results of simulation. The process appears to be effective in developing improved evacuation plans for residents.


Evacuation plan Tsunami Multi-agent simulation (MAS) Disaster risk communication Geographic information system (GIS) Feasibility study 


  1. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan (2011) Report of the committee for technical investigation on countermeasures for earthquakes and Tsunamis based on the lessons learned from the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake. Web Page of Disaster Prevention Information, Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. Accessed 15 Oct 2018
  2. Central Disaster Management Council, Cabinet Office, Government of Japan (2013) Second Report of Meeting for Mega Quake Model in the Nankai Trough, Tsunami Fault Model Version (Nankai torafu no kyodai jishin moderu kentoukai, dainiji houkoku, tsunami dansou moderu hen). Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. Accessed 15 Oct 2018 (in Japanese)
  3. Nakai F, Hatayama M, Yamori K (2015) Integrating computer simulation and the fieldwork to discover possible alternatives for Tsunami evacuation. In: Proceedings of the 48th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Hawaii, USA, pp 200–207Google Scholar
  4. Nakai F, Mochizuki J, Poledna S, Hatayama M, Kumagai K (2017) Evaluation of evacuation plan: taking account of responsiveness of performance to the uncertainty around hazards and the compliance of evacuees. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on computers in urban planning and urban management, Adelaide, Australia, Conference USB (ThuA62_35042)Google Scholar
  5. Rowan KE, Botan CH, Kreps GL, Samoilenko S, Farnsworth K (2010) Risk communication education for local emergency managers: using the CAUSE model for research, education, and outreach. In: (Robert L. Heath and H. Dan O’Hair eds) Handbook of risk and crisis communication. Routledge, pp 359–382Google Scholar
  6. Sun Y, Nakai F, Yamori K, Hatayama M (2017) Tsunami evacuation behavior of coastal residents in Kochi Prefecture during the 2014 Iyonada Earthquake. Nat Hazards 85(1):283–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Nagoya Institute of TechnologyNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations