The Influence of Flexible Towers on the Dynamics of Offshore Wind Turbine Gravity Base Structures

  • Kieran O’LearyEmail author
  • Vikram Pakrashi
  • Denis Kelliher
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 18)


With offshore wind turbines increasing in size, there is increasing interest in non-traditional support structures. New concepts include lightweight and flexible fiberglass composite towers that have potential benefits over traditional stiff steel towers. The aim of this paper was to assess how the combination of a more flexible wind turbine tower with an offshore concrete gravity base foundation would affect the dynamic response of the structure. The results focus on how the dynamic amplification factors (DAFs) change with varying levels of foundation stiffness during an extreme event (50 year return period extreme event).


Composite tower Gravity base Dynamic amplification factor 



The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Ove Arup Foundation and of Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) Research Centre: MaREI - Centre for Marine and Renewable Energy (12/RC/2302). Thanks are also extended to Dr. Tore Holmas of USFOS AS for providing an academic software license and the Netherlands Enterprise Agency for releasing the metocean data for Hollandse Kust Zuid wind farm site.


  1. 1.
    Fullenkamp, P., Holody, D.: U.S. Wind Energy Manufacturing and Supply Chain: A Competitiveness Analysis. Department of Energy (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Young, A.C., et al.: Methodology for optimizing composite towers for use on floating wind turbines. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 9(3), 033305 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    van der Zee, T., et al.: The C-tower project—a composite tower for offshore wind turbines. Energy Procedia 137, 401–405 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abhinav, K.A., Saha, Nilanjan: Dynamic analysis of an offshore wind turbine including soil effects. Procedia Eng. 116, 32 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jonkman, J.: Dynamics Modeling and Loads Analysis of an Offshore Floating Wind Turbine. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Søreide, T., et al.: USFOS—A Computer Program for Progressive Collapse Analysis of Steel Offshore Structures. Theory Manual. Sintef, Trondheim (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marine Technolology Division, Practice for the Site Specific Assessment of Jack-up Units, Shell International Petroleum Maatschappij (SIPM), EDP-5, The Hague, May 1989Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    IEC: International Electro technical Committee IEC 61400-3: Wind Turbines part 3: Design Requirements for Offshore Wind Turbines, 61400-3 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    DNV-GL: Support structures for wind turbines. DNVGL-ST-0126 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jonkman, J.: Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Griffith, T., Johanns, W.: The Sandia 100-meter All-glass Baseline Wind Turbine Blade: SNL100-00. SAND2011-3779 Sandia National Labs (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dubonnet, F., et al.: Wind Farm Zone Hollandse Kust (zuid) & Hollandse Kust (noord) Metocean Study. DHI, Hørsholm (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Obrzud, R., Truty, A.: The Hardening Soil Model—A Practical Guidebook Z Soil. PC 100701 report, revised 31 January 2012Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Griffith, T., Johanns, W.: Large Blade Manufacturing Cost Studies Using the Sandia Blade Manufacturing Cost Tool and Sandia 100-meter Blades. SAND2013-2734. Sandia National Labs (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kieran O’Leary
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vikram Pakrashi
    • 2
  • Denis Kelliher
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity College CorkCorkIreland
  2. 2.School of Mechanical and Materials EngineeringUniversity College DublinDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations