Performance Analysis of Flux-Switching Stator Permanent Magnet Motor Based on Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control
Flux-switching permanent magnet motor (FSPMM) is a new stator permanent magnet brushless motor. It overcomes many shortcomings of the conventional permanent magnet motor having magnets in the rotor and has a well application prospect. The three-phase 12-slots/10-poles FSPMM is used as the control object. On the basis of the working principles, the mathematical models have deduced and the mechanical properties are calculated. The characteristics of the electromagnetic are analysed by setting up the steady and dynamic-state models of the FSPMM. Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control (LADRC) is designed in the speed loop of the FSPMM to realize the linear control of the nonlinear system. By using the Linear Extended State Observer (LESO), the total disturbances can be estimated and compensated in real time. The performance robustness is verified by the Monte Carlo experiments of the two control strategies, including the LADRC algorithm, and the traditional PI control strategy. The results show that LADRC strategy has a greater capability of disturbance rejecting and stronger performance robustness.
KeywordsFlux-switching permanent magnet motor Speed control algorithm Linear active disturbance rejection control Linear extented state observer robustness Monte Carlo
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61573199 and 61573197) and the Tianjin Municipal Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 14JCYBJC18700).
- 8.W. Hua, M. Cheng, A new model of vector-controlled doubly-salient permanent magnet motor with skewed rotor, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (Wuhan, China, 2009), pp. 3026–3031Google Scholar
- 9.H. Jia, M. Cheng, W. Hua, W. Lu, X. Fu, Investigation and implementation of control strategies for flux-switching permanent magnet motor drives, in Proceedings of the IEEE Industry Applications Society Meeting (Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2008), pp. 1–6Google Scholar
- 13.H. Jia, M. Cheng, W. Hua, W. Lu, A new stator-flux orientation strategy for flux-switching permanent motor drive based on voltage space-vector, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (Wuhan, China, 2009), pp. 3032–3036Google Scholar
- 16.J. Han, Active Disturbance Rejection Control Technique-the Technique for Estimating and Compensating the Uncertainties (National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, 2008)Google Scholar
- 18.W. Tan, F. Caifen, Linear active disturbance-rejection control: analysis and tuning via imc. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 63(4), 2350–2359 (2016)Google Scholar
- 21.Q. Zheng, L. Dong, D.H. Lee Zhang, Z. Gao, Active disturbance rejection control for mems gyroscopes. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 17(6), 1432–1438 (2009)Google Scholar