Advertisement

Evolutionary Characteristics and the Adaptability Improvement of an Innovation Ecosystem Based on an Extension NK Model

  • Nanping Feng
  • Furong Ruan
  • Fenfen Wei
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 528)

Abstract

Based on the influence of members’ roles and their relationship strengths on the adaptability of an innovation ecosystem, this paper extends the basic NK model by introducing weight parameter and relationship strength parameter. According to the extended model, three evolutionary characteristics are obtained. Firstly, for an innovation ecosystem, compared with the traditional view of “strengthening the weakness”, “strengthening the strengths” will achieve a higher efficiency for its adaptability enhancement. Secondly, a suitable relationship strength but not a highest one will help to enhance its adaptability. Finally, a global vision will help to achieve the optimal evolution path. Moreover, on the basis of the evolutionary characteristics, we put forward three strategies to improve the system adaptability.

Keywords

Innovation ecosystem System evolution System adaptability NK model 

References

  1. 1.
    A. Gawer, M.A. Cusumano, Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 31(3), 417–433 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Ginsberg, M. Horwitch, S. Mahapatra et al., Ecosystem strategies for complex technological innovation: the case of smart grid development, in Technology Management for Global Economic Growth (IEEE, 2010), pp. 1–8Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    O. Dedehayir, S.J. Mäkinen, J.R. Ortt, Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: a literature review. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Autio, L.D.W. Thomas, Innovation ecosystems: implications for innovation management, in The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management (2014), pp. 204–228Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Gawer, Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: toward an integrative framework. Res. Policy 43(7), 1239–1249 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Chen, F.J. Xie, Bionics study on innovation ecosystems’ evolution path of photovoltaic industry based on Lotka-Voterra model. Res. Develop. Manage. 24(3), 74–84 (2012) (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Still, J. Huhtamäki, M.G. Russell et al., Insights for orchestrating innovation ecosystems: the case of EIT ICT Labs and data-driven network visualizations. Int. J. Technol. Manage. 66(2/3), 243 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.J. Rabelo, P.A. Bernus, Holistic model of building innovation ecosystems, in Ifac Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing (2015), pp. 2250–2257Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Sun, X.F. Xu, H.T. Yao, Research on the evolution of innovation ecosystems based on the MLP framework. Stud. Sci. Sci. 34(8), 1244–1254 (2016). (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Yao, H. Zhou, The dynamic equilibrium and simulation of mobile internet platform innovation ecosystem: a symbiotic evolution model. Kybernetes 45(9), 1406–1420 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Xu, Research on the innovation complexity of business model (Economic Management Press, 2005) (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S.A. Kauffman, The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution (New York & Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Luo, Network structure and evolvability of innovation ecosystems. Acad. Manage. Ann. Meet. Proc. 2014(1), 11518–11518 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. Mohannak, J. Matthews, O. Dedehayir et al., The birth and development of innovation ecosystems: a literature review. Radiat. Meas. 44(5), 571–575 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    B.H. Hou, H. Liu, Analysis on NK model of enterprise network adaptability. China Industr. Econ. 4, 94–104 (2009). (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Holland, Emergence: from chaos to order (Century Publishing Group, Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 2006) (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Adner, Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(4), 98–107; 148 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Wright, The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Genetics (1932), pp. 356–366Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    S.A. Kauffman, Adaptation on rugged fintess landscapes, in Lectures in the Science of Complexity, ed. by D. Stein (Addison-Wesley, Longman, 1989), pp. 527–618Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. Autio, L.D.W. Thomas, Innovation ecosystems: implications for innovation management (The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management, 2014), pp. 204–228Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Almirall, R. Casadesus-Masanell, Open versus Closed innovation: a model of discovery and divergence. Acad. Manag. Rev. 35(1), 27–47 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Iansiti, R. Levien, Strategy as ecology. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(3), 68–78, 126 (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    J.F. Moore, The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. Ecosystems (1996)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    S.T. Pan, Y.L. Zheng, Network relationship strength and enterprise technology innovation performance—based on the empirical research of exploratory learning and exploitative learning. Stud. Sci. Sci. 29(11), 1736–1743 (2011) (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    M.S. Granovetter, The strength of weak ties (1973)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    D. Krackhardt, The strength of strong ties: the importance of philos in organizations. Netw. Org. 216–239 (1992)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    T.L. Saaty, What is the analytic hierarchy process? Mathematical models for decision support (Springer, New York, Inc. 1988), pp. 109–121Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    J. E. J. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, ed. by H.A. Linstone, M. Turoff. J. Market. Res. 18(3), 363–364 (1975)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Y.M. Wang, Using maximization of deviations for multiple index decisions and sorting. Syst. Eng. Electr. 7, 24–26 (1988). (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    G. Zhang, Q.S. Bo, The theory of modular organization structure based on NK model. Soft Sci. 23(6), 24–27 (2009). (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    C.Y. Gao, X.Y. He, Research on the Improvement of Knowledge Innovation in HTVIC based on NK model. Stud. Sci. Sci. 32(11) (2014) (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    J. Ma, H. Zhang, Y.M. Xi, Simulation Research on Maneger’s Recognition based on NK model[J]. Operations Research and Management Science 17(1), 000137–000143 (2008). (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Judy estrin. American innovation is in decline? [M]. China Machine Press,2010Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    R. Adner, R. Kapoor, Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations[J]. Strateg. Manag. J. 31(3), 306–333 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    M. Iansiti, R. Levien, Strategy as ecology [J]. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(3), 68 (2004)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    R. Gulati, P. Puranam, M. Tushman, Meta-organization design: rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strateg. Manag. J. 33(6), 571–586 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    M.A. Cusumano, A. Gawer, The elements of platform leadership. IEEE Eng. Manage. Rev. 31(1), 8–8 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    M. Iansiti, R. Levien, The keystone advantage: what the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Future Surv. 20(2), 88–90 (2004)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Y.R. Li, The technological roadmap of Cisco’s business ecosystem. Technovation 29(5), 379–386 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    L. Pierce, Big losses in ecosystem niches: how core firm decisions drive complementary product shakeouts. Strateg. Manag. J. 30(3), 323–347 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    M. Weiner, N. Nohria, A. Hickeman et al., Value networks—the future of the U.S. electric utility industry. Sloan Manage. Rev. 38(4), 21–34 (1997)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    J.F. Moore, Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Bus. Rev. 71(3), 75 (1993)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    D.S. Evans, A. Hagiu, R. Schmalensee, Invisible engines: how software platforms drive innovation and transform industries. Mit Press Books 1(4), 410–411 (2007)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    R. Normann, R. Ramírez, J. Champy et al., From value chain to value constellation (1996)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    K. Möller, S. Svahn, Role of knowledge in value creation in business nets. J. Manage. Stud. 43(5), 985–1007 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    M. Pagani, C.H. Fine, Value network dynamics in 3G-4G wireless communications: a systems thinking approach to strategic value assessment. J. Bus. Res. 61(11), 1102–1112 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementInstitute of Computer Network System, Hefei University of TechnologyHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations