Axisymmetric Modelling of Stretch Blow Moulding Using a Galerkin Mesh-Free Method

  • Stephen Smith
  • Brian G. FalzonEmail author
  • Gary Menary
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


Mesh-free methods are particularly suitable for material forming simulations, where application of the finite element method can be troublesome due to mesh distortion. This work involves the simulation of stretch blow moulding which is the main manufacturing process used to produce PET drink bottles, a market estimated to grow to $45 billion by the end of 2021. Due to the large deformation involved in the process, conventional finite element simulations can suffer from mesh related issues. This can require a re-meshing procedure and possible solution degradation. In this paper a Lagrangian mesh-free formulation is employed. Initial results confirm the effectiveness of mesh-free methods in simulating the free-blow process.


Mesh-free methods Material forming Non-linear analysis 


  1. 1.
    Smithers PIRA.: The Future of PET Packaging to 2021. Technical report (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, J.S., Hillman, M., Chi, S.W.: Mesh-free methods: progress made after 20 Years. J. Eng. Mech. 143(4), 04017001 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lancaster, P., Salkauskas, K.: Surface generated by moving least square methods. Math. Comput. 37(155), 141–158 (1981)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Belytschko, T., Lu, Y.Y., Gu, L.: Element-free Galerkin methods. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 37(2), 229–256 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Belytschko, T., Liu, W.K., Moran, B., Elkhodary, K.: Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures, 1st edn. Wiley, Chichester (2000)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, J.-S., Pan, C., Cheng-Tang, W., Liu, W.K.: Reproducing kernel particle methods for large deformation analysis of non-linear structures. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 139(96), 195–227 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Joldes, G.R., Chowdhury, H., Wittek, A., Miller, K.: A new method for essential boundary conditions imposition in explicit meshless methods. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 80, 94–104 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dolbow, J., Belytschko, T.: Numerical integration of the Galerkin weak form in mesh-free methods. Comput. Mech. 23(3), 219–230 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, J.S., Yoon, S., Wu, C.T.: Non-linear version of stabilized conforming nodal integration for Galerkin mesh-free methods. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 53(12), 2587–2615 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Menary, G.H.: Biaxial deformation and experimental study of PET at conditions applicable to stretch blow molding. Polym. Eng. Sci. 52(3), 671–688 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bergstrom, J.: Solid Polymer Mechanics, 1st edn. William Andrew, San Diego (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nixon, J., Menary, G.H., Yan, S.: Free-stretch-blow investigation of poly(ethylene terephthalate) over a large process window. Int. J. Mater. Form. 10(5), 765–777 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Salomeia, Y.M., Menary, G.H., Armstrong, C.G.: Instrumentation and modelling of the stretch blow moulding process. Int. J. Mater. Form. 3(SUPPL. 1), 591–594 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringQueens University BelfastBelfastNorthern Ireland

Personalised recommendations