Advertisement

Fundamental of Rail Transportation Active Safety

  • Yong Qin
  • Limin Jia
Chapter
Part of the Advances in High-speed Rail Technology book series (ADVHIGHSPEED)

Abstract

The core of the active safety is the perception and control of system state. By modelling, analyzing and controlling the activities of complex system, so as to reduce the system risk and avoid accident. Active safety theory has spread into many fields including electrical system, power system, Internet, military system, machinery and electronics system and so on. Methods based on the mechanism model, data drive and so on have been researched a lot to realize the active safety. Specifically, rail transportation active safety also attracts lots of attentions. The authors have been engaged in this area for a long time, mainly including the active safety assurance of the rail transportation train, rail network, traffic system and so on. Fruitful achievements have been made based on the research team. In this book, the authors mainly show readers the safety region based active safety methodology and its application in rail transportation.

References

  1. 1.
    A.E. Mohamed, A.A. Essam, Framework for identification of power system operating safety regions. The Third International Conference on Net-work and System Safety, Queensland, 2009, pp. 415–419Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y.U. Yixin, Review of study on methodology of safety regions of power system. J. Tianjin Univ. 41(6), 635–646 (Ch) (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. Zhang, Y. Qin, L. Jia, et al., Research on method framework of safety region estimation in rail transportation system operation safety assessment. J. Syst. Simul. Technol. Appl. 13, 1018–1022 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Zhang, Y. Qin, L. Jia, Research on methodology of safety region estimation of railway system operation safety assessment. Proceedings of World Congress on Engineering and Technology 2011, 06, pp. 803–807Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Zheng, Y. Pan, K. Guo, et al., Study on fault location method of distribution network based on immune algorithm. Power. Syst. Protect. Control. 42(1), 77–83 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Yi, Z. Xin, Z. Xin, Z. Liang, Study on the recognition method of automobile operation state (I) – selection of characteristic parameters. China. Mech. Eng. 24(9), 1258–1263 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    X. Shaobo, Z. Jianmei, X. Zhu, et al., An improved DV-Hop algorithm based on the hop count region. Chin. J. Sens. Actuarors. 27(7), 964–969 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.S. Safizadeh, S.K. Latifi, Using multi-sensor data fusion for vibration fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings by accelerometer and load cell. Inf. Fusion. 18, 1–8 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Y. Zhiyong, Classifier Based on Decision-Making Boundaries in the Perspective of Partitioning Data Space. Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 2011Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Z. Xiang, H.-H. Shen, C. Bing, A cross-safety access control method based on bidirectional defense. Netinfo. Saf. 10, 19–21 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Z. Zhijie, Safety Domain Division of the Key Theory and Application of [D]. Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 2006, pp. 5–15Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. Wensheng, L. Yahui, Z. Yadi, Research on access control mechanism of embedded systems based on safety domain isolation. Comput. Sci. 40(06A), 320–322 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. Wang, Z. Ying-Jian, Z. Jian-Hui, et al., An identity-based routing protocol for secure domain access. J. Softw. 20(12), 3223–3239 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Xiang, Y. Wei, Research on vehicle image recognition and longitudinal safety domain control in front of vehicle. Sci. Technol. Eng. 1, 100–104 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Barzegar, N. Mozayani, M. Fathy, Secure safety messages broadcasting in vehicular network. International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, Bradford, 2009, pp. 1055–1060Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    W. Miao, L. Jie, H. Yanjun, Research and application of safety domain division technology in e-government. Comput. Eng. Sci. 32(8), 52–55 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R.J. Kaye, F.F. Wu, Dynamic safety regions of power systems. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst CAS-29(9), 612–623 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Y. Yu, F. Fei, Active power steady-state safety region of power system. Sci. China. Ser. A 33(121), 1488–1500 (1990)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Y. Makarov, P. Du, S. Lu, T. B. Nguyen, Wide area safety region final report [EB/OL]. http://www.pnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-19331.pdf, March 2010
  20. 20.
    A. E. Mohamed, A. A. Essam, Framework for identification of power system operating safety regions. The Third International Conference on Network and System Safety, Queensland, 2009, pp. 415–419Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Essam, A. Mohamed, Application of operating safety regions in power systems. IEEE PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition. New Orleans, LA, USA, 2010Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Z. Yuan, F. Jichao, Y. Yu, et al., A practical dynamic safety domain for power system. Autom. Electr. Power. Syst. 1, 6–10 (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Y.Y. Yanbin, Z. Yuan, J. Hongjie, N. Ben, H. Nanqiang, T. Zhiyu, Z. Yiming, F. Hongjun, Visual dimension visualization using dynamic secure domain. Autom. Electr. Power. Syst. 29(12), 44–48 (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    L.-j. Wang, G. Wang, Performance evaluation of transient stability of power systems based on dynamic safety and edgeworth series. Proc. CSEE 31(1), 52–58 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. Xue-song, L. Liang, X. Xin-biao, et al., Numerical simulation of dynamic behaviors of high-speed trains in complex environment and analysis of operational safety domains. Comput. Aided. Eng. 03, 29–41 (2011). 59Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. Yu, Z. Jiye, Z. Weihua, Safety of transverse wind traffics on high speed trains on bridges. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 48(18), 104–111 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Z. Yuan, Q. Yong, J. Limin, et al., Study on safety domain estimation method for operational safety assessment of rail transportation system. Syst. Simul. Technol. Appl. 13, 1018–1022 (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Y. Zhang, Y. Qin, Z. Xing, et al., Roller bearing safety region estimation and state identification based on LMD–PCA–LSSVM. Measurement 46(3), 1315–1324 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Z. Yuan, Q. Yong, J. Limin, A estimation of uneven-peak or peak-safe-area based on distribution of risk Points-SVM. J. Cent. South. Univ. Sci. Technol. 43(11), 4533–4541 (2012)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. Amini et al., Wayside detection of faults in railway axle bearings using time spectral kurtosis analysis on high-frequency acoustic emission signals. Adv. Mech. Eng., 8(11) (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    J.S. Goo, J.S. Kim, K.B. Shin, Evaluation of structural integrity after ballast-flying impact damage of a GFRP lightweight bogie frame for railway vehicles. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 29(6), 2349–2356 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    S. Bruni, R. Goodall, T.X. Mei, H. Tsunashima, Control and monitoring for railway vehicle dynamics. Veh. Syst. Dyn. Int. J. Veh. Mech. Mob. 45(7–8), 743–779 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    M.H. Gharavian, F.A. Ganj, A.R. Ohadi, et al., Comparison of FDA-based and PCA-based features in fault diagnosis of automobile gearboxes. Neurocomputing 121, 150–159 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    X. Qian, F. Jun, L. Wang, Effect of friction coefficient on instantaneous rolling contact fatigue of high-speed train wheels. China. Railw. Sci. 37(3), 68–74 (2016)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Z. Rong, S. Hongmei, Research on wheel galling identification algorithm of high speed trains based on high order spectral feature extraction. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 53(6), 102–109 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    H. Peng, Z. Weihua, Statistic rule and prediction model of wheel pair wear of high speed train. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 52(2), 144–149 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    C. Qingsong, X. Guo, X. Guoliang, et al., Study on dynamic characteristics of high speed train bearing loose bearing. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 21, 87–95 (2016)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    W. Jing, Study on Vibration Characteristics of Train Wheels and Key Techniques of Diagnosis. Central South University, Changsha, 2012, pp. 5–10Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    F. Yu, C. Long, S. Zheng, et al., Monitoring method of rail vehicle suspension system based on parameter estimation. J. China. Railw. Soc. 35(5), 15–20 (2013)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Science and Technology Department of Liaoning Province, Application of optical fiber sensing technology in condition monitoring of train body and railway facilities [EB/OL]. http://www.lninfo.gov.cn/kjzx/show.phpitemid=423266, 2010, pp. 11–12
  41. 41.
    I. Aydin, M. Karakose, E. Akin, Anomaly detection using a modified kernel-based tracking in the pantograph–catenary system. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(2), 938–948 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    E. Karakose, M.T. Gencoglu, M. Karakose, et al., A new arc detection method based on fuzzy logic using S-transform for pantograph–catenary systems. J. Intell. Manuf., 1–18 (2015)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    M. Bocciolone, G. Bucca, A. Collina, L. Comolli, An approach to monitor railway pantograph-catenary interaction with fiber optic sensors. Proceedings of the SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2010, 7653:76533Q (4 pp.)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    G. Bucca, A. Collina, A procedure for the wear prediction of collector strip and contact wire in pantograph–catenary system. Wear 266(1), 46–59 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    E.A. Mohamed, A.Y. Abdelaziz, A.S. Mostafa, A neural network-based scheme for fault diagnosis of power transformers. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 75(1), 29–39 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    S. Hedayati Kia, H. Henao, G.A. Capolino, Mechanical health assessment of a railway traction system. The 14th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, Ajaccio, France, 2008, pp. 453–458Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    D. Grillo, C. Landi), M. Luiso, N. Pasquino, An on-board monitoring system for electrical railway traction systems. IMTC 2006 – Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, Sorrento, Italy, 24–27 April 2006, pp. 2306–2311Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    H. Kamijo, H. Hata, H. Fujimoto, A. Inoue, K. Nagashima, K. Ikeda, A. Iwakuma, K. Funaki, Y. Sanuki, A. Tomioka, H. Yamada, K. Uwamori, S. Yoshida, Tests of superconducting traction transformer for railway rolling stock. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 17(2), 1927–1930 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    M. Mermet-Guyennet, M. Piton, Railway traction reliability. The 6th International Conference on Integrated Power Electronics Systems (CIPS), Germany, 16–18 March 2010, pp. 1–6Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Z. Yuan, Q. Yong, X. Cheng, P. Xuemiao, X. Zongyi, Relationship analysis between contact surface unevenness and bow mesh contact force based on improved NARX Neural Network. China. Railw. Sci. 33(3), 84–91 (2012)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    L. Kai, F. Yao-ping, L. Ying-long, Design and implementation of bow network monitoring system. Comput. Meas. Contr. 14(5), 600–602 (2006)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    P. Wei, D. He, M. Jian, X. Yang, Study on condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of pantograph. J. Guangxi Univ. Nat. Sci. Ed. 36(5), 718–722 (2011)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Z. Yanyan, Metro Vehicle Traction System Fault Diagnosis Technology and System. Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, 2009, pp. 11–25Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    C. Xiao-xuan, L. Yong-yi, S. Yong-teng, Fault diagnosis of locomotive traction motor based on neural network information fusion. Comput. Meas. Contr. 15(5), 563–565, 573 (2007)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    L Ling, Research on Fault Diagnosis of Traction Converter. Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 2010, pp. 5–35Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    W Yi, Locomotive Traction Converter Fault Diagnosis Based on Data Mining. Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, 2005, pp. 15–26Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    G. Niu, Y. Zhao, M. Defoort, et al., Fault diagnosis of locomotive electro-pneumatic brake through uncertain bond graph modeling and robust online monitoring. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 50, 676–691 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    X. Zhuan, X. Xia, Fault-tolerant control of heavy-haul trains. Veh. Syst. Dyn. Int. J. Veh. Mech. Mob. 48(6), 705–735 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    L. Wan-xin, Z. Yang, R.-w. Lin, et al., Fault diagnosis and safety measures for brake system of harmony No. EMU. Railw. Locomot. Car. 31(5), 39–42 (2011)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    J. Liu, Y.F. Li, E. Zio, A SVM framework for fault detection of the braking system in a high speed train. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 87, 401–409 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    C. Guoqiang, J. Yang, Z. Liming, J. Limin, Reliability analysis of passenger brake system of metro vehicles based on FTA. Int. Conf. Model. Simul. Optim. Beijing, 323–328 (2009)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    D. Jianbo, C. Hangfeng, The design of fault diagnosis system of 120-type freight train brake. 2011 International Conference on Electric Information and Control Engineering (ICEICE), Wuhan, 2011, pp. 5463–5465Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    X. Wang, M. Wu, Research on unit brake reliability of urban rail transportation vehicles. Urban. Mass. Transport. 11, 52–53 (2010)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    L. Xinghua, On-line diagnosis of synchronous braking system for heavy haul combined train based on MAS. Changsha. Cent. South Univ., 2–15 (2009)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    M. Wu, X.-y. Wang, T. Chun, Reliability of relay valve used in braking system of rail transportation vehicles. J. SouthWest JiaoTong Univ. 44(3), 365–369 (2009)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    El K. Kadri, A. Berthon, Simulation of a dual hybrid generator for heavy vehicle application. The 32nd Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics (IECON), Paris, France, 2006, pp. 2642–2647Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    W. Canpei, S. Xianhai, H. Shunhao, Web based remote monitoring and control system for emergency power supply of highspeed rail train. International Conference on Transportation, Mechanical, and Electrical Engineering (TMEE), Changchun, China, 2011, pp. 694–697Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    M. Berger, C. Lavertu, I. Kocar, et al., Proposal of a time-domain platform for short-circuit protection analysis in rapid transportation train DC auxiliary systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 52(6), 5295–5304 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    J.D. Wu, S.Y. Liao, Fault diagnosis of an automotive air-conditioner blower using noise emission signal. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(2), 1438–1445 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Y. Dichen, J. Limin, Q. Yong, P. Wei, Y. Yang, Fault diagnosis of auxiliary inverter system of urban rail transportation based on wavelet BP neural network. Chin. J. Constr. Mach. 11(6), 542–546 (2013)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    L. Gang, Fuzzy logic for battery state of technology. 1995 China Intelligent automation conference and intelligent automation professional committee proceedings proceedings (second). Tianjin, China, 1995, pp. 936–941Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    G. Yajun, Fault analysis of three-phase ac overvoltage monitoring for auxiliary inverter of AC02 train. Science and Technology Conference of Shanghai Metro Operation Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 2006, pp. 261–264Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Y. Qiang, C. Ang-long, W. Li, T. Sheng-gui, Starting Failure Analysis and Countermeasure of Auxiliary Inverter for DCO l Type Electric Train. Shanghai Subway Operation Co., 2006, pp. 191–193Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    C. Xiaoliang, Analysis of emergency lighting failures of Guangzhou metro line 5 train. Urban. Mass. Transport. 14(7), 70–71, 75 (2011)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    C. Huanxin, Z. Jun, W. Shanzhe, Fault diagnosis expert system for passenger car air conditioning units (2002) 1:69–72Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    M Chuan. Fault Feature Extraction and Application of Rolling Bearing. Dalian University of Technology, 2009, pp. 2–5Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    H. Weiguo, Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis of Rotating Machinery Based on Feature Extraction and Expression of Vibration Signals. University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 2010, pp. 4–10Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    S. Wentao, Roller Bearing Surface Damage Fault Feature Extraction and Diagnostic Methods. Jinan, Shandong University, (2011), pp. 10–30Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    T. Deyao, Generalized Resonance, Resonance Demodulation Fault Diagnosis and Safety Engineering: Railway (China Railway Publishing House, Beijing, 2006), pp. 8–105Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    L. Yongbin, Study on Condition Monitoring and Diagnosis of Rolling Bearing Based on Nonlinear Signal Analysis (University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 2011), pp. 3–15Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    S. He, J. Lin, Zhang Bing. high speed train shaft vibrating harvester. Eng. Test. 50(1), 54–57 (2010)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    S. Wanfeng, Z. Shengtang, H. Jie, Fault diagnosis of train bearing based on high order cumulant adaptive algorithm. J. Vib. Eng. 19(2), 234–237 (2006)Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    P. He, L. Pan, S. Huiqi, S. Nanxiang, Design of acoustic signal acquisition system for train bearace fault. Autom. Instrum. 10, 8–11 (2011)Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    D. Fuyan, Research on general scheme of locomotive bearing monitoring and diagnosis. Diesel. Locomot. 8, 15–17 (2006)Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    N.K. Nabiyev, Diagnostics of axle boxes bearings based on identification measuring method. Trans. Univ. Karaganda. State. Tech. Univ. 1, 77–79 (2010)Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    J. Yang, C. Guoqiang, Y. Dechen, H. Qiang, L. Jie, Fault diagnosis method for the rolling bearing of railway vehicle based on wavelet packet transform and BP neural network. China Railw. Sci. 31(6), 68–73 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    W. He, X. Zhou, Application of the wavelet-SOFM network in roll bearing defect diagnosis. 2009 WRI Global Congress on Intelligent Systems (GCIS 2009), 2009, pp. 8–12Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    J. Yang, Z. Mingyuan, Robot bearing diagnosis system based on vehicle bus and Laplace wavelet. J. China. Railw. Soc. 33(8), 23–27 (2011)Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    M.-g. Yu, Z. Ji-ye, Z. Wei-hua, Analysis of crosswind safety of high-speed trains based on reliability. J. Vib. Shock. 32(20), 90–96 (2013)Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Li Chao, Wang Ying. Hierarchical coupling analysis of equipment system safety based on reliability and IPPM. China. Saf. Sci. J., 2013, 8 (08)Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Z.-m. Yu, Z. Hong-lun, Life-cycle safety management system of rolling stock structure based on reliability. China. Railw. Sci. 26(6), 1–5 (2005)Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    S. Hongsheng, C. Yulong, Z. Youpeng, Reliability evaluation of on-board subsystem of CTCS-3 train control system based on bayesian network. China. Railw. Sci. 05, 96–104 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yong Qin
    • 1
  • Limin Jia
    • 1
  1. 1.Beijing Jiaotong UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations