Advertisement

Storage and Analysis of Synchrophasor Data for Event Detection in Indian Power System Using Hadoop Ecosystem

  • Akhilendra Pratap Singh
  • G. Hemant Kumar
  • Subhendu Sekhar Paik
  • Diptendu Sinha RoyEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 847)

Abstract

Synchrophasor devices commonly referred to as phasor measurement units (PMUs) have been rapidly deployed in power grids to get a clearer picture of the events that take place in power grid at very high sampling rates. Thus PMUs enable event predictions to become more accurate. However, high data-sampling rate of PMUs creates huge volumes of data on a GB scale per PMU per day, which in turn makes the storage and analysis of the collected data difficult; giving rise to a Big Data problem use case. In India, National Load Dispatch Centre (NLDC) uses Synchrowave; a centralized software package to collect, store and process, which runs on a single very high-end system for storage and processing. But the centralized architecture of current system gives no room for scalability, neither in computation nor storage, even with costly hardware upgrades. This paper proposes a system model with all the desired features using open-source frameworks and tools like Apache Hadoop and HBase.

Keywords

Phasor measurement unit (PMU) Synchrowave Hadoop HBase 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been carried out by financial assistances from SERB-DST (File no. EMR/2017/001508). The authors wish to thank POSOCO, New Delhi for providing necessary synchrophasor data.

References

  1. 1.
    Phadke, A.G.: Synchronized phasor measurements in power systems. IEEE Comput. Appl. Power 6(2), 10–15 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aghaei, J., Alizadeh, M.I.: Demand response in smart electricity grids equipped with renewable energy sources: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 18, 64–72 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mohanta, D., Roy, D.: Importance and uncertainty analysis in software reliability assessment of computer relay. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O J. Risk Reliab. 225(1), 50–61 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roy, D.S., Mohanta, D.K., Panda, A.: Software reliability allocation of digital relay for transmission line protection using a combined system hierarchy and fault tree approach. IET Softw. 2(5), 437–445 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Das, H., Roy, D.: A grid computing service for power system monitoring. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 62(20) (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Polaki, S.K., Reza, M., Roy, D.S.: A genetic algorithm for optimal power scheduling for residential energy management. In: 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC), IEEE, pp. 2061–2065 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mondal, S., Murthy, C., Roy, D., Mohanta, D.: Simulation of phasor measurement unit (pmu) using labview. In: 2014 14th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC), IEEE, pp. 164–168 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mohanta, D.K., Murthy, C., Sinha Roy, D.: A brief review of phasor measurement units as sensors for smart grid. Electr. Power Compon. Syst. 44(4), 411–425 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murthy, C., Mishra, A., Ghosh, D., Roy, D.S., Mohanta, D.K.: Reliability analysis of phasor measurement unit using hidden Markov model. IEEE Syst. J. 8(4), 1293–1301 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murthy, C., Roy, D.S., Mohanta, D.K.: Reliability evaluation of phasor measurement unit: a system of systems approach. Electr. Power Compon. Syst. 43(4), 437–448 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murthy, C., Varma, K.A., Roy, D.S., Mohanta, D.K.: Reliability evaluation of phasor measurement unit using type-2 fuzzy set theory. IEEE Syst. J. 8(4), 1302–1309 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roy, D.S., Murthy, C., Mohanta, D.K.: Reliability analysis of phasor measurement unit incorporating hardware and software interaction failures. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 9(2), 164–171 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Dahal, O.P., Brahma, S.M., Cao, H.: Comprehensive clustering of disturbance events recorded by phasor measurement units. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 29(3), 1390–1397 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu, L., Chai, J., Qi, H., Liu, Y.: Power grid disturbance analysis using frequency information at the distribution level. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGrid-Comm), IEEE, pp. 523–528 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dahal, O.P., Brahma, S.M.: Preliminary work to classify the disturbance events recorded by phasor measurement units. In: 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, IEEE, pp. 1–8 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Todd, M.J., Yıldırım, E.A.: On Khachiyan’s algorithm for the computation of minimum-volume enclosing ellipsoids. Discret. Appl. Math. 155(13), 1731–1744 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rusitschka, S., Eger, K., Gerdes, C.: Smart grid data cloud: a model for utilizing cloud computing in the smart grid domain. In: 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), IEEE, pp. 483–488 (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Allen, A.J.: Analysis of Transmission System Events and Behavior Using Customer Level Voltage Synchrophasor Data (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bach, F., Cakmak, H.K., Maass, H., Kuehnapfel, U.: Power grid time series data analysis with pig on a Hadoop cluster compared to multi core systems. In: 2013 21st Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing (PDP), IEEE, pp. 208–212 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Song, Y., Zhu, Y., Li, L.: Large scale data storage and processing of insulator leakage current using HBase and mapreduce. In: 2014 International Conference on Power System Technology (POW-ERCON), IEEE, pp. 1331–1337 (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Allen, A., Singh, M., Muljadi, E., Santoso, S.: PMU Data Event Detection: A User Guide for Power Engineers. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Foster, I., Zhao, Y., Raicu, I., Lu, S.: Cloud computing and grid computing 360-degree compared. In: Grid Computing Environments Workshop, 2008. GCE’08, IEEE, pp. 1–10 (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Borthakur, D., et al.: HDFS architecture guide. Hadoop Apache Proj. 53, 1–13 (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Apache: Apache Thrift. https://thrift.apache.org
  26. 26.
    Apache: Apache HBase. http://hbase.apache.org/

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akhilendra Pratap Singh
    • 1
  • G. Hemant Kumar
    • 2
  • Subhendu Sekhar Paik
    • 1
  • Diptendu Sinha Roy
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.National Institute of Technology MeghalayaShillongIndia
  2. 2.ICTS-TIFRBengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations