Advertisement

Situation-Aware Conditional Sensing in Disaster-Prone Areas Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in IoT Environment

  • J. Sathish KumarEmail author
  • Mukesh A. Zaveri
  • Saurabh Kumar
  • Meghavi Choksi
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 847)

Abstract

Environmental sensing is the most crucial task that needs to be performed in order to analyze the situation of a region during a disaster. The devices deployed in such regions are responsible for sensing and communication effectively. During a disaster, the operation of these devices may be affected by the environmental conditions and their respective power constraints. Moreover, the mobility of these devices in the network leads to a challenging task to perform sensing and communication in such an environment. The disaster recovery may need different sensor data at various points of time. In such cases, the selectivity of data from different sensors and its dissemination in real time are the most important tasks. In this paper, the proposed algorithm is based on the situation-aware conditional sensing for disaster-prone areas using unmanned aerial vehicles. The technique presented in this paper focuses on the control of way points of the aerial vehicles based on the events detected in the Internet of Things environment.

Keywords

Disaster management Unmanned aerial vehicles Internet of things 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), funded by Government of India (Grant no. 13(4)/2016-CC&BT).

References

  1. 1.
    Cavallo, E., Noy, I., et al.: Natural disasters and the economy—a survey. Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ. 5(1), 63–102 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benfold, B., Reid, I.: Stable multi-target tracking in real-time surveillance video. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 3457–3464 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Houston, J.B., Hawthorne, J., Perreault, M.F., Park, E.H., Goldstein Hode, M., Halliwell, M.R., Turner McGowen, S.E., Davis, R., Vaid, S., McElderry, J.A., et al.: Social media and disasters: a functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters 39(1), 1–22 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rose, A.: Economic resilience to natural and man-made disasters: multidisciplinary origins and contextual dimensions. Environ. Hazards 7(4), 383–398 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zaveri, M.A., Kumar, J.S., Pandey, S.K., Choksi, M.: Collaborative Data Processing and Resource Optimization for Post Disaster Management and Surveillance using IoT. Technical Report from (MeitY), India (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bandyopadhyay, D., Sen, J.: Internet of Things: applications and challenges in technology and standardization. Wireless Pers. Commun. 58(1), 49–69 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kumar, J.S., Zaveri, M.A.: Graph based clustering for two-tier architecture in Internet of Things. In: Proceedings of 9th IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings), pp. 229–233 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pajares, G.: Overview and current status of remote sensing applications based on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Photogram. Eng. Remote Sens. 81(4), 281–329 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tuna, G., Nefzi, B., Conte, G.: Unmanned aerial vehicle-aided communications system for disaster recovery. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 41, 27–36 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reiter, G.: Wireless connectivity for the Internet of Things. Europe 433, 868 MHz (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mason, I.A., Nigam, V., Talcott, C., Brito, A.: A framework for analyzing adaptive autonomous aerial vehicles. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods, pp. 406–422. Springer (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hasofer, A., Beck, V.R., Bennetts, I.: Risk Analysis in Building Fire Safety Engineering. Routledge (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Plate, E.J.: Flood risk and flood management. J. Hydrol. 267(1–2), 2–11 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yan, Y., Cheng, L., Wu, Z., Yam, L.: Development in vibration-based structural damage detection technique. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 21(5), 2198–2211 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davids, A.: Urban search and rescue robots: from tragedy to technology. IEEE Intell. Syst. 17(2), 81–83 (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hadi, G.S., Varianto, R., Trilaksono, B., Budiyono, A.: Autonomous UAV system development for payload dropping mission. J. Instrum. Autom. Syst. 1(2), 72–77 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Sathish Kumar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mukesh A. Zaveri
    • 1
  • Saurabh Kumar
    • 1
  • Meghavi Choksi
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Engineering DepartmentSardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of TechnologySuratIndia

Personalised recommendations