Advertisement

Unconfined Compressive Strength of Bacillus Pumilus Treated Lateritic Soil

  • Kolawole J. Osinubi
  • John E. Sani
  • Adrian O. Eberemu
  • Thomas S. Ijimdiya
  • Sabo E. Yakubu
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

The study considered the use of Bacillus pumilus to trigger microbial-induced calcite precipitation (MICP) process for the improvement of the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of lateritic soil to be used as a hydraulic barrier in waste containment application. The lateritic soil was treated with stepped Bacillus pumilus suspension densities of 0, 1.5 × 108, 6.0 × 108, 12 × 108, 18 × 108 and 24 × 108 cells/ml, respectively. Specimens were prepared at moulding water contents –2, 0, 2 and 4% relative to the optimum moisture content (OMC) that simulate field variation in moisture and compacted with British Standard light (or standard Proctor) energy. The UCS values increased with higher Bacillus pumilus suspension densities and moulding water content. Peak UCS values of 1159.08, 1169.52, 1298.27 and 1884.58 kN/m2 were obtained at 6.0 × 108/ml, 24.0 × 108/ml, 6.0 × 108/ml and 18 × 108/ml Bacillus pumilus suspension densities for specimens prepared at –2%, 0%, +2% and +4% relative to OMC, respectively. A compaction plane of acceptable zones for UCS based on regulatory value (i.e., > 200 kN/m2) gave 6.0 × 108/ml Bacillus pumilus suspension density as optimum treatment for lateritic soil to be used in waste containment application.

Keywords

Bacillus pumilus Lateritic soil Microbial-induced calcite precipitate Unconfined compressive strength Waste containment 

References

  1. 1.
    Karol RH (2003) Chemical grouting and soil stabilization, 3rd edn. M. Dekker, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Basha EA, Hashim R, Mahmud HB, Muntohar AS (2005) Stabilization of residual soil with rice husk ash and cement. Constr Build Mater 19:448–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DeJong JT, Fritzges MB, Nüsslein K (2006) Microbially induced cementation to control sand response to undrined shear. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132:1381–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daniel DE, Wu YK (1993) Compacted clay liners and covers for arid sites. J Geotech Eng ASCE 119(2):223–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daniel DE, Liljestrand HM (1984) Effect of landfill leachate on natural liner system), Geotechnical Engineering Report, GR 83-6 (Geotechnical Engineering Centre, University of Texas, Austin, Tex.) 86Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ozcoban MS, Tufekci N, Tutus S, Sahin U, Celik SO (2006) Leachate removal rate and the effect of leachate on the hydraulic conductivity of natural (undisturbed) clay. J Sci Ind Res 65:264–269Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harkes MP, Van Paassen LA, Booster JL, Whiffin VS, Van Loosdrecht MCM (2010) Fixation and distribution of bacterial activity in sand to induce carbonate precipitation for ground reinforcement. Ecol Eng 36(2):112–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stocks-Fischer S, Galinat JK, Bang SS (1999) Microbiological precipitation of CaCO3. Soil Biol Biochem 31(11):1563–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stoner DL, Watson SM, Stedtfeld RD, Meakin P, Griffel LK, Tyler TL, Pegram LM, Barnes JM, Deason VA (2005) Application of stereo lithographic custom models for studying the impact of biofilms and mineral precipitation on fluid flow. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(12):8721–8728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Qabany AA, Mortensen B, Martinez B, Soga K, Dejong J (2011) Microbial carbonate precipitation correlation of s-wave velocity with calcite precipitation. Geo-Frontiers 2011, pp 3993–4001Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Soon N, Lee L, Khun T, Ling H (2014) Factors affecting improvement in engineering properties of residual soil through microbial-induced calcite precipitation. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140(5): 04014006 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ASTM (1992): Annual Book of Standards, vol 04.08, American Society for Testing and Materials, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    AASHTO (1986) Standard Specifications for Transport Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing. In: 14th Edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington, D.C Clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 127(1):67–75Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Osinubi KJ, Eberemu AO, Ijimdiya TS, Sani JE, Yakubu SE (2018) Volumetric shrinkage of compacted lateritic soil treated with bacillus pumilus. In: Farid A, Chen H (eds) Proceedings of GeoShanghai 2018 international conference: geoenvironment and geohazard. GSIC 2018, pp 315–324. Springer, Singapore.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0128-5_36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yasuhara H, Hayashi K, Okamura M (2011) Evolution in mechanical and hydraulic properties of calcite-cemented sand mediated by biocatalyst. In: Proceedings of geo-frontiers 2011: advances in geotechnical engineering, Dallas TX, ASCE, Geotechnical special publication 211, pp 3984–3992Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Park S, Choi S, Kim W, Lee J (2014a) Effect of microbially induced calcite precipitation on strength of cemented sand. In: Proceedings new frontiers in geotechnical engineering 2014: technical papers, ASCE, Geotechnical special publication 234, pp 47–56Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Park S, Choi S, Nam I (2014b) Effect of plant-induced calcite precipitation on the strength of sand. ASCE J Mater Civ Eng 26(8): 06014017 1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5533.0001029
  18. 18.
    Li B, Chu J, Whittle A (2016) Biotreatment of fine-grained soil through the bioencapsulation method. In: Proceedings of Geo-Chicago 2016: technical papers, ASCE, Geotechnical special publication 269, pp 25–32Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Putra H, Yasuhara H, Kinoshita N, Neupane D, Lu C-W (2016) Effect of magnesium as substitute material in enzyme-mediated calcite precipitation for soil-improvement technique. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 4:37.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2016.00037
  20. 20.
    Osinubi KJ, Eberemu AO, Ijimdiya ST, Yakubu, SE, Sani JE (2017) Potential use of bacillus pumilus in microbial-induced calcite precipitation improvement of lateritic soil. In: Proceedings of the 2nd symposium on coupled phenomena in environmental geotechnics (CPEG2), Leeds, UKGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Daniel DE, Benson CH (1990) Water content density criteria for compacted soil liners. J Geotech Eng ASCE 116(12):1811–1830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Romero E, Simms PH (2008) Investigation in unsaturated soils: a review with special attention to contribution of mercury intrusion porosimetry and environmental scanning electron microscopy. J Geotech Geol Eng 8:1–23Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Etim RK, Eberemu AO, Osinubi KJ (2017) Stabilization of black cotton soil with lime and iron ore tailings admixture. Transp Geotech 10(2017):85–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wei-Soon Ng, Lee M-L, Hii S-L (2012) An overview of the factors affecting microbial-induced calcite precipitation and its potential application in soil improvement. World academy of science, engineering and technology, vol 6, pp 683–689Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hanifi C, Waleed S, Ibrahim HK (2015) Bacterail calcium carbonate precipitation in peat. Arab J Sci Eng 40:2251–2260.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-015-1760-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kolawole J. Osinubi
    • 1
  • John E. Sani
    • 2
  • Adrian O. Eberemu
    • 1
  • Thomas S. Ijimdiya
    • 1
  • Sabo E. Yakubu
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringAhmadu Bello UniversityZariaNigeria
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringNigerian Defence AcademyKadunaNigeria
  3. 3.Department of MicrobiologyAhmadu Bello UniversityZariaNigeria

Personalised recommendations