Advertisement

Experimental Study of Shear Strength of Geosynthetic Clay Liner for Monotonic Loading

  • Ji-Yun Chang
  • Shi-Jin Feng
  • Yang Shen
  • Hao Shi
  • Jia-Liang Shi
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

Internal shear strength of geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) is of vital importance for the stability of waste containment facilities where GCLs are widely used as hydraulic barriers. This paper presents an experimental investigation of the internal shear strength of hydrated needle-punched geosynthetic clay liners (NP GCLs) under monotonic loading. A new dynamic direct shear apparatus with the capability to cover a large range of normal stress and displacement rate is developed. Series of direct shear tests on NP GCL for different normal stress levels and displacement rates are performed. The failure mechanism of hydrated GCL is explored through inspection of tested specimens and analysis of test results. The intrinsic relationship between peak/residual shear strength of NP GCL and displacement rate is also studied. Experimental results indicated that displacement rate has obvious effect on the peak shear strength of NP GCL, while the influence of displacement rate on residual shear strength is of little significance for the same normal stress level.

Keywords

Geosynthetic clay liner Direct shear test Shear strength Landfill 

References

  1. Chen YM, Lin WA, Zhan TL (2010) Investigation of mechanisms of bentonite extrusion from GCL and related effects on the shear strength of GCL/GM interfaces. Geotext Geomembr 28(1):63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Daniel DE, Shan HY, Anderson JD (1993) Effects of partial wetting on the performance of the bentonite component of a geosynthetic clay liner. In: Proceedings of the geosynthetics, Vancouver, Canada, vol 3, pp 1483–1496. Industrial Fabrics Association International, RosevilleGoogle Scholar
  3. Eid HT, Stark TD (1997) Shear behavior of an unreinforced geosynthetic clay liner. Geosynth Int 4(6):645–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eid HT, Stark TD, Doefler CK (1999) Effect of shear displacement rate on internal shear strength of a reinforced geosynthetic clay liner. Geosynth Int 6(3):219–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feng SJ, Chang JY, Chen HX (2018) Seismic analysis of landfill considering the effect of GM-GCL interface within liner. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 107:152–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fox PJ, Stark TD (2004) State-of-the-art report: GCL shear strength and its measurement. Geosynth Int 11(3):141–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fox PJ, Sura JM, Nye CJ (2015) Dynamic shear strength of a needle-punched GCL for monotonic loading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141(7):04015025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fox PJ, Stark TD (2015) State-of-the-art report: GCL shear strength and its measurement–ten-year update. Geosynth Int 22(1):3–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kavazanjian E, Arab M, Matasovic N (2013) Performance of two geosynthetics-lined landfills in the northridge earthquake. In: 7th international conference on case histories in geotechnical engineering, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. McCartney JS, Zornberg JG, Swan RH (2002) Internal and interface shear strength of geosynthetic clay liners (GCLs). Geotechnical Research Rep., Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 450Google Scholar
  11. Stark TD, Eid HT (1996) Shear behavior of reinforced geosynthetic clay liners. Geosynth Int 3(6):771–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Zornberg JG, McCartney JS, Swan RH (2005) Analysis of a large database of GCL internal shear strength results. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(3):367–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ji-Yun Chang
    • 1
  • Shi-Jin Feng
    • 1
  • Yang Shen
    • 1
  • Hao Shi
    • 1
  • Jia-Liang Shi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geotechnical EngineeringTongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations