Advertisement

Pore Size Distribution and Hydraulic Conductivity Characteristics of Solidified Sewage Sludge

  • Xihui FanEmail author
  • Wei Zhu
  • Haoqing Xu
  • Shengwei Wang
  • Shi Shu
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

The hydraulic conductivity of solidified sewage sludge is low because of its high organic matter content, which in turn limits the application of solidified sludge to areas where high hydraulic conductivity is needed. In this study, permeability tests and centrifuge tests were conducted investigate the hydraulic conductivity characteristics of solidified sludge in intact and remolded situations and their relationship to variations in pore size distribution. The results show that solidification changed the sludge morphology from loose flocks to small particles with a diameter of around 50 μm. In addition, the hydraulic conductivity of intact solidified sludge ranged from 10−7 to 10−6cm/s. After remolding, sludge cured with 40% SAC (sulfoaluminate cement) showed an increase in hydraulic conductivity of two orders of magnitude. The fundamental process governing increases in hydraulic conductivity is the formation of a dual-porosity structure in the remolding process.

Keywords

Sewage sludge Hydraulic conductivity Solidified Pore size distribution 

References

  1. Benson CH, Daniel DE (1990) Influence of clods on the hydraulic conductivity of compacted clay. J Geotech Eng 116:1231–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen L, Lin D-F (2009) Stabilization treatment of soft subgrade soil by sewage sludge ash and cement. J Hazard Mater 162:321–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. He J, Li F, Li Y, Cui X-l (2015) Modified sewage sludge as temporary landfill cover material. Water Sci Eng 8:257–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kim E-H, Cho J-K, Yim S (2005) Digested sewage sludge solidification by converter slag for landfill cover. Chemosphere 59:387–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Koerner RM, Soong T-Y (2000) Leachate in landfills: the stability issues. Geotext Geomembr 18:293–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lapierre C, Leroueil S, Locat J (1990) Mercury intrusion and permeability of Louiseville clay. Can Geotech J 27:761–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lin C, Zhu W, Han J (2013) Permeability and leachability of solidified sewage sludge. Environ Geotech 1(1):33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lu N, Likos WJ (2004) Unsaturated Soil Mechanics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Marshall TJ (1958) A relation between permeability and size distribution of pores. Eur J Soil Sci 9:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nagaraj TS, Pandian NS, Narasimha Raju PSR (1991) An approach for prediction of compressibility and permeability behaviour of sand-bentonite mixes. Indian Geotech J 21:271–282Google Scholar
  11. Reatto A, da Silva EM, Bruand A, Martins ES, Lima JEFW (2008) Validity of the centrifuge method for determining the water retention properties of tropical soils’. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:1547–1553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Washburn EW (1921) Note on a method of determining the distribution of pore sizes in a porous material. Proc Nat Acad Sci 7:115–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhang DQ, Tan SK, Gersberg RM (2010) Municipal solid waste management in China: status, problems and challenges. J Environ Manag 91:1623–1633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhang W-j, Zhang G-g, Chen Y-m (2013) Analyses on a high leachate mound in a landfill of municipal solid waste in China. Environ Earth Sci 70:1747–1752CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xihui Fan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Wei Zhu
    • 1
  • Haoqing Xu
    • 1
  • Shengwei Wang
    • 1
  • Shi Shu
    • 1
  1. 1.Geotechnical Research InstituteHohai UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations