Advertisement

Performance Issues of Barrier Systems for Landfills

  • Nathalie Touze-Foltz
  • Haijian Xie
  • Guillaume Stoltz
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

The objective of the paper is to give an update in key topics related to performance issues of barrier systems for landfills. The objective of using barrier systems is to minimize the impact of contaminants on the surrounding environment. To achieve this goal puncture protection of the geomembrane must be ensured. An update is first given is this matter. The question of the stability on slope of geosynthetic barrier systems is then discussed and an insight is given in modeling and laboratory measurement of parameters required to perform reliable modeling, especially as regards the case of piggy-back landfills. Finally, the question of transfers though bottom barrier systems is addressed, giving an update especially in the analytical solutions developed in the past 10 years in China in this matter.

Keywords

Geosynthetics Landfills Transfers Protection Stability 

References

  1. Abuel-Naga HM, Bouazza A (2014) Numerical experiment-artificial intelligence approach to develop empirical equations for predicting leakage rates through GM/GCL composite liners. Geotext Geomem 42:236–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AFNOR (2016) EN ISO 13719. Geosynthetics – determination of the long term protection efficiency of geosynthetics in contact with geosynthetic barriersGoogle Scholar
  3. AFNOR (2015) EN ISO 10318. Geosynthetics - terms and definitionsGoogle Scholar
  4. AFNOR (2005a) EN ISO 12957-1, geosynthetic - determination of friction characteristics, Part 1: direct shear testGoogle Scholar
  5. AFNOR (2005b). EN ISO 12957-2, geosynthetic - determination of friction characteristics, Part 2: inclined plane testGoogle Scholar
  6. Bishop AW (1955) The use of the slip circle in the stability analysis of slopes. Geotechnique 5:7–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergado DT, Ramana GV, Sia HI, Varun R (2006) Evaluation of interface shear strength of composite liner system and stability analysis for a landfill lining system in Thailand. Geotext Geomem 24(6):371–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brachman RWI, Sabir A (2013) Long-Term assessment of a layered-geotextile protection layer for geomembranes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(5):752–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bouazza A, Zornberg JG, Adam D (2002) Geosynthetics in waste containment facilities: recent advances. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on geosynthetics, Nice, pp 445–507. ISBN 90 5809 525 8Google Scholar
  10. Briançon L, Girard H, Gourc JP (2011) A new procedure for measuring geosynthetic friction with an inclined plane. Geotext Geomem 29:472–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Briançon L, Girard H, Poulain D (2002) Slope stability of lining systems: experimental modeling of friction at geosynthetic interfaces. Geotext Geomem 20:147–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carbone L, Gourc JP, Carrubba P, Pavanello P, Moraci N (2015) Dry friction behaviour of a geosynthetic interface using inclined plane and shaking table tests. Geotext Geomem 43:293–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen YM, Li JC, Yang CB, Zhu B, Zhan LT (2017) Centrifuge modeling of municipal solid waste landfill failures induced by rising water levels. Can Geotech J 54:1739–1751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen Y, Lin W, Zhan TLT (2010) Investigation of mechanisms of bentonite extrusion from GCL and related effects on the shear strength of GCL/GM interfaces. Geotext Geomem 28(1):63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen YM, Wang YZ, Xie HJ (2015) Breakthrough time-based design of landfill 1.2 section heading composite liners. Geotext Geomembr 43:196–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen YM, Deng G, Zhu B, Chen RP (2008) Seismic stability and permanent displacement of landfill along liners. Sci China Ser E Technol Sci 51(4):407–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dixon JH, von Maubeuge K (1992) Geosynthetic protection layers for the lining systems of landfills. Ground Eng: 28–30Google Scholar
  18. El-Zein A, McCarroll I, Touze-Foltz N (2012) Three-dimensional finite-element analyses of seepage and contaminant transport through composite geosynthetic clay liners with multiple defects. Geotext Geomem 33:34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fellenius W (1927) Erdstatische Berechnungen mit Reibung und Kohäsion (Adhäsion) und unter Annahme kreiszylindrischer Gleitflächen. Ernst & Sohn, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferreira FB, Vieira CS, Lopes ML (2016) Soil-geosynthetic interface strength properties from inclined plane and direct shear tests - a comparative analysis. In: GA 2016 - 6th Asian regional conference on geosynthetics: geosynthetics for infrastructure developmentGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferreira FB, Vieira CS, Lopes ML (2015) Direct shear behaviour of residual soil–geosynthetic interfaces – influence of soil moisture content, soil density and geosynthetic type. Geosyn Int 22:257–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fleming IR, Rowe RK (2004) Laboratory studies of clogging of landfill leachate collection & drainage systems. Can Geotech J 41(1):134–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foose GJ (2010) A steady-state approach for evaluating the impact of solute transport through composite liners on groundwater quality. Waste Man 30:1577–1586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gallagher EM, Darbyshire W, Warwick RG (1999) Performance testing of landfill geoprotectors: background, critique, development and current UK practice. Geosyn Int 6(4):283–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gartung E (1994) Discussion of session E7: protection of geomembrane liners, permissible local strain in the geomembrane. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on geotextiles, geomembranes and related products, Singapore, vol 4, pp 1521–1523Google Scholar
  26. Giroud JP, Williams ND, Pelte T, Beech JF (1995) Stability of geosynthetic-soil layered systems on slopes. Geosyn Int 2(6):1115–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Giroud JP, Bonaparte R (1989) Leakage through liners constructed with geomembranes. 2. Composite liners. Geotext Geomem 8(2):71–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones DRV (2015) Using geosynthetics for sustainable development. In: The 2nd international GSI-Asia geosynthetics conference (GSI-Asia 2015), Seoul, Korea, 4 pGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones RV, Dixon N (2011) European perspectives on sustainable development using Geosynthetics. In: Proceedings of the 24th annual GRI conference: optimizing sustainability using geosynthetics, Dallas, Texas, USA, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  30. Koerner RM, Wong WK, Koerner GR (2012) Index puncture resistance of geomembranes using various protection geosynthetics. Geotech Testing J 35(5):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koerner RM (2005) Designing with geosynthetics, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, p 816Google Scholar
  32. Koerner RM, Soong TY (2000) Leachate in landfills: the stability issues. Geotext Geomem 18:293–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koerner RM, Soong TY (1998) Analysis and design of veneer cover soils. Geosyn Int 12(1):28–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Koerner RM, Wilson-Fahmy RF, Narejo D (1996) Puncture protection of geomembranes. Part III: examples. Geosyn Int 3(5):655–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Koutsourais MM, Sprague CJ, Pucetas RC (1991) Interfacial friction study of cap and liner components for landfill design. Geotext Geomem 10:531–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin JP, Koerner RM (1985) Geotechnical design considerations for geomembrane lined slopes: slope stability. Geotext Geomem 2:299–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Narejo D, Koerner RM, Wilson-Fahmy RF (1996) Puncture protection of geomembranes. Part II: experimental. Geosyn Int 3(5):629–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Palmeira EM, Lima NR Jr, Mello LGR (2002) Interaction between soils and geosynthetic layers in large-scale ramp tests. Geosyn Int 9:149–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pitanga HN, Gourc JP, Vilar OM (2009) Interface shear strength of geosynthetics: evaluation and analysis of inclined plane test. Geotext Geomem 27:435–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Powrie W, Beaven RP, Richards DJ (2014) Landfill aftercare: meeting the challenge. In: 2014 Engineers Australia, pp 219–226Google Scholar
  41. Qian X, Koerner RM (2009) Stability analysis when using an engineered berm to increase landfill space. J Geotech Geoenv Eng 135:1082–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reddy KR, Saichek RE (1998) Performance of protective cover systems for landfill geomembrane liners under long-term MSW loading. Geosyn Int 5(3):287–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reddy KR, Bandi SR, Rohr JJ, Finny M, Siebken J (1996) Field evaluation of protective covers for landfill geomembrane liners under construction loading. Geosyn Int 3(6):679–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reyes-Ramirez R, Gourc JP (2003) Use of the inclined plane test in measuring geosynthetic interface friction relationship. Geosyn Int 10:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rong F, Zhaogui G, Tugen F (2011) Analysis of stability and control in landfill sites expansion. In: Proceedings of the international conference on advances in engineering. Procedia engineering, vol 24, pp 667–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rowe RK (2017) Protecting the environment with geosynthetics. The 53rd Karl Terzaghi Lecture, ppt presentation (complimentary copy), 100 pGoogle Scholar
  47. Rowe RK (2009) Long-term performance of leachate collection systems and geomembrane liners for MSW landfills. In: Proceedings of the geoafrica 2009, first African conference on Geosynthetics, Cape Town, South Africa, 23 pGoogle Scholar
  48. Rowe RK (1998) Geosynthetics and the minimization of contaminant migration through barrier systems beneath solid waste. In: Keynote lecture, proceedings of the 6th international conference on geosynthetics, vol 1, Atlanta, USA, pp 27–103Google Scholar
  49. Rowe RK, Brachman RWI (2004) Assessment of equivalence of composite liners. Geosyn Int 11(4):273–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rowe RK, Quigley RM, Brachman RWI, Booker JR (2004). Barrier systems for waste disposal facilities. Taylor & Francis (E & FN Spon), London, 587 p, ISBN 0-419-22630-3Google Scholar
  51. Saathoff F, Sehrbrock H (1994) Indicators for selection of protective layers for geomembranes. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on geotextiles, geomembranes and related products, Singapore, pp 1019–1022Google Scholar
  52. Stoltz G, Hérault A (2014) Assessing interface friction angles of geosynthetics by comparing two loading methods. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on geosynthetics, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  53. Stoltz G, Auray G (2014) Comparison of various testing methods for soil-geogrid friction parameters estimation to stabilise a thin soil layer on slopes. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on geosynthetics, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  54. Stoltz G, Croissant, D, Touze-Foltz N (2013) Some geotextiles properties useful for HDPE geomembrane puncture protection. In: TC 215 symposium coupled phenomena in environmental geotechnics (CPEG), Torino, Italy, 6 pGoogle Scholar
  55. Tano BFG, Dias D, Stoltz G, Touze-Foltz N, Olivier F (2017a) Numerical modelling to identify key factors controlling interface behaviour of geosynthetic lining systems. Geosyn Int 24(2):167–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tano BFG, Stoltz G, Touze-Foltz N, Dias D, Olivier F (2017b) A numerical modelling technique for geosynthetics validated on a cavity model test. Geotext Geomem 45:339–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tano BFG, Dias D, Fowmes GJ, Olivier F, Stoltz G, Touze-Foltz N (2016) Numerical modeling of the nonlinear mechanical behaviour of multilayer geosynthetic system for piggy-back landfill expansion. Geotext Geomembr 44(6):782–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tano F, Olivier F, Touze-Foltz N, Dias D (2015) State-of-the-art of piggy-back landfills worldwide: comparison of containment barrier technical designs and performance analysis in terms of geosynthetics stability. In: Proceedings of geosynthetics 2015, 15–18 February, Portland, Oregon, USA, 11 pGoogle Scholar
  59. Thiel RS (1998) Design methodology for a gas pressure relief layer below a geomembrane landfill cover to improve slope stability. Geosyn Int 5(6):589–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tognon AR, Rowe RK, Moore ID (2000) Geomembrane strain observed in large-scale testing of protection layers. J Geotech Geoenv Eng 126(12):1194–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Touze-Foltz N, Bannour H, Barral C, Stoltz G (2016) A review of the performance of geosynthetics for environmental protection. Geot Geomem 44:656–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Touze-Foltz, N, Lupo J, Barroso M (2008) Geoenvironmental applications of geosynthetics. In: Keynote lecture: proceedings of eurogeo 4, the 4th European conference on geosynthetics, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 98 pGoogle Scholar
  63. Touze-Foltz N, Barroso M (2006) Empirical equations for calculating the rate of liquid flow through GCL-geomembrane composite liners. Geosyn Int 13(2):73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vieira CS, Lopes ML, Caldeira LM (2013) Sand-geotextile interface characterisation through monotonic and cyclic direct shear tests. Geosyn Int 20:26–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wasti Y, Özdüzgün ZB (2001) Geomembrane–geotextile interface shear properties as determined by inclined board and direct shear box tests. Geotext Geomem 19:45–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilson-Fahmy RF, Narejo D, Koerner RM (1996) Puncture protection of geomembranes Part I: theory. Geosyn Int 3(5):605–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Xie HJ, Zhang C, Feng S, Wang Q, Yan H (2018) Analytical model for degradable organic contaminant transport through a GMB/GCL/AL System. J Environ Eng 144(3):04018006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Xie HJ, Jiang YS, Zhang CH, Feng SJ (2015a) An Analytical model for volatile organic compound transport through a composite liner consisting of a geomembrane, a GCL and a soil liner. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:2824–2836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Xie HJ, Zhang CH, Sedighi M, Thomas HR, Chen YM (2015b) An analytical model for diffusion of chemicals under thermal effects in semi-infinite porous media. Comput Geotech 69:329–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Xie HJ, Jiang YS, Zhang CH, Feng S, Qiu Z (2015c) Steady-state analytical models for performance assessment of landfill composite liners. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:12198–12214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Xie HJ, Lou ZH, Chen YM, Jin AM, Zhan LT, Tang XW (2013) An analytical solution to organic contaminant diffusion through composite liners considering the effect of degradation. Geotext Geomembr 36:10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Xie HJ, Chen YM, Lou ZH (2010) An analytical solution to contaminant transport through composite liners with geomembrane defects. Sci China Technol Sci 40(5):486–495zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  73. Xie H, Chen Y, Ke H, Tang X, Chen R (2009) Analysis of diffusion-adsorption equivalency of landfill liner systems for organic contaminants. J Env Sci 21:552–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Xie HJ, Ke H, Chen YM, Tang XW (2006) Analysis of one dimensional organic contaminants diffusion through composite liners under time-dependant concentration conditions. Acta Sci Circumstantiae 26(6):930–936Google Scholar
  75. Yesiller N, Manheim D, Hanson J, Chrysovergis T (2016) Temperature-dependent variation in surface characteristics of a textured geomembrane due to interface shear testing against a GCL. In: 3rd Pan-American Conference on Geosynthetics, Geo-Americas 2016, Miami Beach, USAGoogle Scholar
  76. Zanzinger H (1999) Efficiency of geosynthetic protection layers for geomembrane liners: performance in a large-scale model test. Geosyn Int 6(4):303–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhan LT, Chen C, Bouazza A, Chen YM (2018) Evaluation leakages through GMB/GCL composite liners considering random hole distribution in wrinkle networks. Geotext Geomem 46:131–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nathalie Touze-Foltz
    • 1
  • Haijian Xie
    • 2
  • Guillaume Stoltz
    • 3
  1. 1.Irstea, HBAN UnitAntony CedexFrance
  2. 2.Institute of Hydrology and Water Resources EngineeringZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  3. 3.Irstea, Recover UnitAntony CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations