Advertisement

Energy and Exergy Analysis of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Integrated with Gas Turbine Cycle—“A Hybrid Cycle”

  • Tushar Choudhary
  • Mithilesh Kumar Sahu
Conference paper

Abstract

The available waste heat at the gas turbine exhaust has enough potential which can be utilized by integration other thermal systems with the gas turbine cycle. Solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) is one such promising system that can perfectly been integrated with gas turbine power cycles. In this work, a hybrid power cycle has been developed by integrating recuperative gas turbine cycle with the fuel cell, i.e., SOFC. Through successful thermal integration, the thermal efficiency of conventional gas turbine cycle has enhanced by around 70–80%. This can only be achieved by effective utilization of available waste heat at gas turbine exhaust. The performance of hybrid cycle has been examined from the thermodynamic analysis, i.e., energy analysis and exergy analysis. From the detailed parametric analysis, the influence of turbine inlet temperature, air flow rate, compression ratio, etc. are seen. The thermodynamic performance characteristics of a developed hybrid cycle are compared with the available literature, which shows good agreement. The results obtained from energy and exergy analysis are employed to evaluate the thermodynamic losses in each cycle component and to estimate the work potentials of the fluid streams as well as heat interactions. It has been observed that by increasing turbine inlet temperature (TIT), the performance of hybrid cycle can be increased significantly. In addition to this, the exergy destruction within SOFC decreases as air flow rate increases, whereas in combustion chamber the exergy destruction tends to increase.

Keywords

SOFC-GT Energy Exergy Hybrid cycle 

Nomenclature

.

A

Active surface area (cm2)

E

Voltage (V)

Eo

Ideal cell voltage at standard conditions (Volts)

exchemical

Exergy of fuel (chemical) (kJ/kg)

exphysical

Exergy of fuel (physical) (kJ/kg)

ex

Specific exergy (kJ/kg)

Ex

Exergy destruction rate (kW)

F

Faraday constant (C)

h

Enthalpy (kJ/kg)

j

Current density (A/cm2)

jo

Exchange current density (mA/cm2)

Sgen

Entropy generation rate (W/K)

LHV

Lower heating value (J/mol)

\(\dot{m}\)

Mass flow rate (kg/s)

P

Pressure (bar)

\(\dot{Q}\)

Heat transfer rate (kW)

R

Universal gas constant (J/mol K)

T

Temperature (K)

TIT

Turbine inlet temperature (K)

UF

Fuel utilization ratio

Wcell

Power output of cell (W)

\(\dot{W}\)

Power (kW)

Greek Letter

η

Efficiency

ε

Effectiveness

Subscripts

c

Compressor

dest

Destruction

f

Fuel

gen

Generator

cell, fc

Fuel cell

rc

Recuperator

GT

Gas turbine

PT

Power turbine

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang X, Chan SH, Li G, Ho HK, Feng Z (2010) A review of integration strategies for solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 195(3):685–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Timurkutluk B, Timurkutluk C, Mat MD, Kaplan Y (2016) A review on cell/stack designs for high performance solid oxide fuel cells. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 56:1101–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choudhary T, Sahu MK, Sanjay CFD (2017) Modeling of SOFC cogeneration system for building application. Energy Procedia 109:361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moussawi HA, Fardoun F, Louahlia H (2017) 4-E based optimal management of a SOFC-CCHP system model for residential applications. Energy Convers Manag 151:607–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Palomba V, Prestipino M, Galvagno A (2017) Tri-generation for industrial applications: development of a simulation model for a gasification-SOFC based system. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42(46):27866–27883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Choudhary T, Sahu M, Krishna S (2017) Thermodynamic analysis of solid oxide fuel cell gas turbine hybrid system for aircraft power generation. SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-2062Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rajashekara K, MacBain JA, Grieve MJ (2006) Evaluation of SOFC hybrid systems for automotive propulsion applications. IEEE Trans.  https://doi.org/10.1109/IAS.2006.256741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dimitrova Z, Maréchal F (2017) Environomic design for electric vehicles with an integrated solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) unit as a range extender. Renew Energy 112:124–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Al-Qattan AM, Chmielewski DJ, Al-Hallaj S, Selman JR (2004) A novel design for solid oxide fuel cell stacks. Chem Eng Sci 59(1):131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ding J, Liu J (2009) A novel design and performance of cone-shaped tubular anode-supported segmented-in-series solid oxide fuel cell stack. J Power Sour 193(2):769–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mahisanana C, Authayanun S, Patcharavorachot Y, Arpornwichanop A (2017) Design of SOFC based oxyfuel combustion systems with anode recycling and steam recycling options. Energy Convers Manag 151:723–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen J, Liang M, Zhang H, Weng S (2017) Study on control strategy for a SOFC-GT hybrid system with anode and cathode recirculation loops. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42(49):29422–29432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Choudhary T, Sanjay (2017) Thermodynamic assessment of advanced SOFC-blade cooled gas turbine hybrid cycle. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42(15):10248–10263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Choudhary T, Sanjay (2017) Novel and optimal integration of SOFC-ICGT hybrid cycle: energy analysis and entropy generation minimization. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 42(23):15597–15612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Choudhary T, Sanjay (2017) Thermodynamic assessment of SOFC-ICGT hybrid cycle: energy analysis and entropy generation minimization Energy 134:1013–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Choudhary T, Sanjay (2016) Computational analysis of IR-SOFC: thermodynamic, electrochemical process and flow configuration dependency. Int J Hydrogen Energy 41(2):1259–1271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Choudhary T, Sanjay (2016) Computational analysis of IR-SOFC: transient, structural integrity, carbon deposition and flow dependency. Int J Hydrogen Energy 41(24):10212–10227Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Worall M, Elmer T, Riffat S, Wu S, Du S (2017) An experimental investigation of a micro-tubular SOFC membrane-separated liquid desiccant dehumidification and cooling tri-generation system. Appl Therm Eng 120:64–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Choudhary T, Sanjay, Murthy PV (2015) Parametric analysis of syn-gas fueled SOFC with internal reforming. SAE Technical Paper.  https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1176
  20. 20.
    Haseli Y, Dincer I, Naterer GF (2008) Thermodynamic modeling of a gas turbine cycle combined with a solid oxide fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33(20):5811–5822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tse L, Galinaud F, Martinez-Botas RF. Integration of solid oxide fuel cells into a gas turbine cycle. In: ASME turbo expo power for land. Sea and Air. http://www.felicitas-fuel-cells.info/files/061101_ASME2007_Tse.pdf>2007 (Palais Des Congres Montreal DRAFT)

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringVIT Bhopal UniversityKotrikalan, SehoreIndia
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentGVP College of EngineeringVisakhapatnamIndia

Personalised recommendations