‘A Good Enough Fix’: Repair and Maintenance in Librarians’ Digitization Practice

  • Moritz F. FürstEmail author


Moritz Fürst examines how librarians deal with the unavoidable decay of archived and to-be-archived books in the context of a large-scale digitization project. The librarians’ professional repair and maintenance work is specified by the complex nature of the books and the ‘double bind’ of their routine treatment. At the same time, they are to be preserved as jewels of cultural heritage and national identity and to be made available to interested visitors. The chapter focuses on the digitization process disclosing a tension between preservation and availability in the multiple enactments of documentary heritage artifacts. Through ‘shadowing’ librarians at work, Fürst explores librarians’ distinctive care and professional vision, as well as their local inquiries into book properties, material and digital.


  1. Baksik, Corinna. 2006. Fair use or exploitation? The Google Book Search controversy. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 6 (4): 399–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bishop, Ann Peterson, Nancy A. Van House, and Barbara P. Buttenfield (eds.). 2003. Digital Library Use: Social Practice in Design and Evaluation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Buckland, Michael K. 1997. What is a ‘document’? Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48 (9): 804–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2006. Emanuel Goldberg and His Knowledge Machine: Information, Invention, and Political Forces. Westport, CO: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  5. Bush, Vannevar. 1945. As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly 176 (1): 101–108.Google Scholar
  6. Carlin, Andrew P. 2009. Segmented professions: Further considerations of theory and practice in LIS and librarianship. Library Philosophy and Practice. October. Retrieved 10 March 2014
  7. Ceruzzi, Paul E. 2012. Computing: A Concise History. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cornelius, Ian. 1997. Research as practice. In Library and Information Studies: Research and Professional Practice, ed. Micheline Beaulieu, Elisabeth Davenport, and Nils Ole Pors, 243–248. London: Taylor Graham.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2004. Information and its philosophy. Library Trends 52 (3): 377–386.Google Scholar
  10. Coyle, Karen. 2006a. Mass digitization of books. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 32 (6): 641–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 2006b. One word: Digital. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 32 (2): 205–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cubitt, Sean. 2006. Library. Theory, Culture & Society 23 (2–3): 581–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Denis, Jérôme, and David Pontille. 2015. Material ordering and the care of things. Science, Technology and Human Values 40 (3): 338–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ernst, Wolfgang. 2002. Das Rumoren der Archive: Ordnung aus Unordnung. Berlin: Merve Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Evens, Tom, and Laurence Hauttekeete. 2011. Challenges of digital preservation for cultural heritage institutions. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 43 (3): 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gad, Christopher, and Casper Bruun Jensen. 2009. On the consequences of Post-ANT. Science, Technology and Human Values 35 (1): 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garfinkel, Harold, and Harvey Sacks. 1986 [1970]. On formal structures of practical actions. In Ethnomethodological Studies of Work, ed. Harold Garfinkel, 160–193. London and New York City, NY: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  18. Goffman, Erving. 1990 [1959]. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  19. Goodwin, Charles. 1994. Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96 (3): 606–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Graham, Stephen, and Nigel Thrift. 2007. Out of order: Understanding repair and maintenance. Theory, Culture & Society 24 (3): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gregson, Nicky, Alan Metcalfe, and Louise Crewe. 2009. Practices of object maintenance and repair: How consumers attend to consumer objects within the home. Journal of Consumer Culture 9 (2): 248–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Henke, Christopher R. 1999. The mechanics of workplace order: Toward a sociology of repair. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 44: 55–81.Google Scholar
  23. Ingold, Tim. 2007. Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues 14 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jackson, Steven J. 2014. Rethinking repair. In Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, ed. Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo J. Boczkowski, and Kirsten A. Foot, 221–293. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Jeanneney, Jean-Noël. 2005. Quand Google défie l’Europe. Plaidoyer pour un sursaut. Paris: Mille et une nuits.Google Scholar
  26. Jones, Siân, and Thomas Yarrow. 2013. Crafting authenticity: An ethnography of conservation practice. Journal of Material Culture 18 (1): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaiser, Max. 2012. Putting 600,000 books online: The large-scale digitisation partnership between the Austrian National Library and Google. Liber Quarterly 21 (2): 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Knorr-Cetina, Karin D. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lackie, Robert J. 2008. From Google Print to Google Book Search: The controversial initiative and its impact on other remarkable digitization projects. The Reference Librarian 49 (1): 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Latour, Bruno. 1986. Visualisation and cognition: Drawing things together. In Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, vol. 6, ed. Henrika Kuklick and Elizabeth Long, 1–40. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Latour, Bruno, and Adam Lowe. 2011. The migration of the aura, or how to explore the original through its facsimiles. In Switching Codes: Thinking Through Digital Technology in the Humanities and the Arts, ed. Thomas Bartscherer and Roderick Coover, 275–297. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Law, John, and John Hassard (eds.). 1999. Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Levie, Françoise. 2006. L’homme qui voulait classer le monde. Paul Otlet et le Mundaneum. Bruxelles: Les Impressions Nouvelles.Google Scholar
  35. Levy, David M. 2003. Documents and libraries: A sociotechnical perspective. In Digital Library Use: Social Practice in Design and Evaluation, ed. Ann Peterson Bishop, Nancy A. Van House, and Barbara P. Buttenfield, 25–42. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Lewis, Ben. 2013. Google and the World Brain. Polar Star Films.Google Scholar
  37. Lynch, Michael E. 1982. Technical work and critical inquiry: Investigations in a scientific laboratory. Social Studies of Science 12 (4): 499–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ———. 2013. Ontography: Investigating the production of things, deflating ontology. Social Studies of Science 43 (3): 444–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mol, Annemarie. 1999. Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In Actor Network Theory and After, ed. John Law and John Hassard, 74–89. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Nichols, Stephen G. 2006. An artifact by any other name: Digital surrogates of medieval manuscripts. In Archives, Documentation, and Institutions of Social Memory: Essays from the Sawyer Seminar, ed. Francis Xavier Blouin Jr. and William G. Rosenberg, 134–143. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  42. Niggemann, Elisabeth, Maurice Lévy, and Jacques De Decker. 2011. The new Renaissance: Report of the comité des sages on bringing Europe’s cultural heritage online. Retrieved 4 October 2013
  43. Nyce, James M., and Paul Kahn (eds.). 1991. From Memex to Hypertext: Vannevar Bush and the Mind’s Machine. Boston, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  44. Randall, Dave, and Wes W. Sharrock. 2011. The sociologist as movie critic. In Ethnomethodology at Work, ed. Mark Rouncefield and Peter Tolmie, 1–18. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  45. Rieder, Bernhard. 2013. 81.498 words: The book as data object. In The Unbound Book, ed. Adriaan van der Weel and Joost Kircz, 57–70. Amsterdam: University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Schütz, Alfred. 1971 [1953]. Wissenschaftliche Interpretation und Alltagsverständnis menschlichen Handelns. In Gesammelte Aufsätze I: Das Problem der sozialen Wirklichkeit, 3–54. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thiem, Jon. 1995. Myths of the universal library: From Alexandria to the postmodern age. The Serials Librarian 26 (1): 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Watson, Rod, and Andrew P. Carlin. 2012. ‘Information’: Praxeological considerations. Human Studies 35 (2): 327–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Westin, Jonathan. 2013. Loss of culture: New media forms and the translation from analogue to digital books. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 19 (2): 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Woolgar, Steve, and Javier Lezaun. 2013. The wrong bin bag: A turn to ontology in science and technology studies? Social Studies of Science 43 (3): 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zimmerman, Don H., and Melvin Pollner. 1970. The everyday world as a phenomenon. In Understanding Everyday Life: Toward the Reconstruction of Sociological Knowledge, ed. Jack D. Douglas, 80–103. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations