Repair Work as Inquiry and Improvisation: The Curious Case of Medical Practice

  • Cornelius SchubertEmail author


Cornelius Schubert draws on ethnographic observations in hospitals to highlight the importance of repairing technical equipment and adjusting organisational procedures in medical practice. Routinely faced with divergent breakdowns and failures, nurses and doctors constantly engage in situated inquiries into the causes, nature and consequences of material and organisational problems, and improvise more or less robust remedies to them, thereby taking responsibility for vital issues. Drawing on pragmatist philosophy, Schubert highlights the constitutive dimensions of inquiry and improvisation in repair, notably with respect to how priorities are negotiated and established in medical practice. He shows how technical and organisational breakdowns are often interrelated and how technical fixes may resolve organisational problems and vice versa.


  1. Atkinson, Paul A. 1995. Medical Talk and Medical Work: The Liturgy of the Clinic. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, Howard S. 2000. The etiquette of improvisation. Mind, Culture, and Activity 7 (3): 171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, Howard S., Blanche Geer, Everett C. Hughes, and Anselm L. Strauss (eds.). 1961. Boys in White. Student Culture in Medical School. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berg, Marc, and Annemarie Mol (eds.). 1998. Differences in Medicine: Unraveling Practices, Techniques, and Bodies. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blumer, Herbert. 1954. What’s wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review 19 (1): 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bosk, Charles L. 2003 [1979]. Forgive and Remember: Managing Medical Failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977 [1972]. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bruni, Attila, Trevor J. Pinch and Cornelius Schubert. 2013. Technologically dense environments: What for? What next? Tecnoscienza 4 (2): 51–72.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, Colin, and Trevor J. Pinch. 2014 [1995]. The Hard Sell. The Art of Street-Wise Selling. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  10. Collins, Harry M., Gerard H. de Vries, and Wiebe E. Bijker. 1997. Ways of going on. An analysis of skill applied to medical practice. Science, Technology & Human Values 22 (3): 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crossan, Mary M. 1998. Improvisation in action. Organization Science 9 (5): 593–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cubasch, W. 1884. Die Improvisation der Behandlungsmittel im Kriege und bei Unglücksfällen. Vademecum für Ärzte und Sanitätspersonen. Wien: Urban & Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
  13. Dant, Tim. 2010. The work of repair. Gesture, emotion and sensual knowledge. Sociological Research Online 15 (3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Denis, Jérôme, and David Pontille. 2015. Material ordering and the care of things. Science, Technology and Human Values 40 (3): 338–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dewey, John. 1916. Essays in Experimental Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 1930 [1929]. The Quest for Certainty. A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 1938. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  18. Fox, Renée C. 1957. Training for uncertainty. In The Student-Physician. Introductory Studies in the Sociology of Medical Education, ed. Robert K. Merton, George Reader, and Patricia L. Kendall, 207–241. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Freidson, Eliot. 1970. Profession of Medicine. A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  20. Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Garud, Raghu, and Peter Karnøe. 2003. Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy 32 (2): 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gießmann, Sebastian, and Gabriele Schabacher. 2014. Umwege und Umnutzung oder: Was bewirkt ein “Workaround”? In Umnutzung. Alte Sachen, neue Zwecke, ed. Stephan Habscheid, Gero Hoch, Hildegard Schröteler-v. Brandt, Volker Stein, 13–26. Göttingen: V&R unipress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodwin, Dawn. 2007. Upsetting the order of teamwork. Is ‘the same way every time’ a good aspiration? Sociology 41 (2): 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Graham, Stephen, and Nigel Thrift. 2007. Out of order: Understanding repair and maintenance. Theory, Culture & Society 24 (3): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harper, Douglas. 1987. Working Knowledge: Skill and Community in a Small Shop. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Heath, Christian, Paul Luff, and Marcus Sanchez Svensson. 2003. Technology and medical practice. Sociology of Health & Illness 25 (3): 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henke, Christopher R. 2000. The mechanics of workplace order. Toward a sociology of repair. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 44: 55–81.Google Scholar
  28. Hughes, Everett C. 1951. Mistakes at work. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 17: 320–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson, Steven J. 2014. Rethinking repair. In Media Technologies. Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, ed. Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo J. Boczkowski, and Kirsten A. Foot, 221–239, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Joas, Hans. 1996. The Creativity of Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kalthoff, Herbert. 2010. Beobachtung und Komplexität. Überlegungen zum Problem der Triangulation. Sozialer Sinn 11 (2): 353–365.Google Scholar
  32. Kamoche, Ken, Miguel Pina e Cunha, and João Vieira da Cunha. 2003. Towards a theory of organizational improvisation: Looking beyond the jazz metaphor. Journal of Management Studies 40 (8): 2023–2051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Knorr, Karin. 1979. Tinkering toward success: Prelude to a theory of scientific practice. Theory and Society 8: 347–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Landström, Catharina, Sarah J. Whatmore, and Stuart N. Lane. 2013. Learning through computer model improvisations. Science, Technology and Human Values 38 (5): 678–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Middleton, David. 1996. Talking work: Argument, common knowledge, and improvisation in teamwork. In Cognition and Communication at Work, ed. Yrjö Engeström, and David Middleton, 233–256. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Mol, Annemarie, Ingunn Moser, and Jeannette Pols (eds.). 2010. Care in Practice. On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  37. Montgomery Hunter, Kathryn. 1991. Doctors’ Stories. The Narrative Structure of Medical Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Mort, Maggie, Dawn Goodwin, Andrew F. Smith, and Catherine Pope. 2005. Safe asleep? Human-machine relations in medical practice. Social Science and Medicine 61 (9): 2027–2037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mort, Maggie, Carl R. May, and Tracy Williams. 2003. Remote doctors and absent patients. Acting at a distance in telemedicine? Science, Technology & Human Values 28 (2): 274–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Orr, Julian E. 1996. Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca: ILR Press.Google Scholar
  41. Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  42. Pinch, Trevor J., Harry M. Collins, and Larry Carbone. 1996. Inside knowledge: Second order measures of skill. The Sociological Review 44 (2): 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Popitz, Heinrich, Hans Paul Bahrdt, Ernst August Jüres, and Hanno Kesting. 1957. Technik und Industriearbeit. Soziologische Untersuchungen in der Hüttenindustrie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  44. Ryle, Gilbert. 1976. Improvisation. Mind 85 (337): 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sawyer, R. Keith. 2000. Improvisation and the creative process: Dewey, Collingwood, and the aesthetics of spontaneity. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 58 (2): 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schubert, Cornelius. 2006. Die Praxis der Apparatemedizin. Ärzte und Technik im Operationssaal. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  47. ———. 2007. Risk and safety in the operating theatre: An ethnographic study of socio-technical practices. In Biomedicine as Culture: Instrumental Practices, Technoscientific knowledge, and New Modes of Life, ed. Regula V. Burri, and Joseph Dumit, 123–138, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. ———. 2011. Making sure. A comparative micro-analysis of diagnostic instruments in medical practice. Social Science & Medicine 73 (6): 851–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. ———. 2012. Distributed sleeping and breathing: On the agency of means in medical work. In Agency Without Actors? New Approaches to Collective Action, ed. Jan-Hendrik Passoth, Birgit Peuker, and Michael Schillmeier, 113–129. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Strauss, Anselm L. 1978. Negotiations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  51. Strauss, Anselm L., Shizuko Fagerhaugh, Barbara Suczek, and Carolyn Wiener. 1985. Social Organization of Medical Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Strauss, Anselm L., Leonard Schatzman, Danuta Ehrlich, Rue Bucher, and Melvin Sabshin. 1963. The hospital and its negotiated order. In The Hospital in Modern Society, ed. Freidson, 147–169. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  53. Suchman, Lucy A. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions. The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. ———. 2007. Human-Machine Reconfigurations. Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Sudnow, David. 1978. Ways of the Hand: The Organization of Improvised Conduct. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Timmermans, Stefan, and Marc Berg. 1997. Standardization in action: Achieving local universality through medical protocols. Social Studies of Science 27: 273–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. ———. 2003. The practice of medical technology. Sociology of Health and Illness, 25 (3): 97–114.Google Scholar
  58. Wright, Peter, and Andrew Treacher (eds.). 1982. The Problem of Medical Knowledge. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SiegenSiegenGermany

Personalised recommendations