An Integrated HRM Framework for Remote Managers

  • Leigh-ann OnnisEmail author
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)


Key Messages
  • Supportive management practices are more likely to improve workforce sustainability.

  • The HR outcomes that influenced remote health workforce sustainability were associated with professional isolation, empowerment and remuneration.

  • Without management practices HRM policy choices do not result in the HR outcomes that influence remote health workforce sustainability.

  • The I-HRM-SRHW framework can assist remote managers to implement localised HRM policies and improve workforce sustainability.

  • Remote managers need to know the key ingredients for workforce sustainability; then determine the combination and quantity of these ingredients suitable for their particular remote context.


  1. Beer M, Spector B, Lawrence PR, Mills DQ, Walton RE (1984) Managing human assets. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Birks M, Mills J, Francis K, Coyle M, Davis J, Jones J (2010) Models of health service delivery in remote or isolated areas of Queensland: a multiple case study. Aust J Adv Nurs 28(1):25–34Google Scholar
  3. Buckingham M, Coffman C (1999) First, break all the rules. What the worlds greatest managers do differently. Simon and Schuster, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Brunetto Y, Farr-Wharton R, Shacklock K (2010) The impact of supervisor-subordinate relationships on morale: implications for public and private sector nurses’ commitment. Hum Resour Manag J 20(2):206–225. Scholar
  5. Campbell N, McAllister L, Eley D (2012) The influence of motivation in recruitment and retention of rural and remote allied health professionals: a literature review. Rural Remote Health 12:1900Google Scholar
  6. Fisher KR, Fraser JD (2010) Rural health career pathways: research themes in recruitment and retention. Aust Health Rev 34(3):292–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gould-Williams J, Davies F (2005) Using social exchange theory to predict the effects of HRM practice on employee outcomes. Pub Manage Rev 7(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hackman JR,Oldham GR (1976) Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organ Behav Hum Perform 16(2):250–279. Scholar
  9. Humphreys JS, McGrail MR, Joyce CM, Scott A, Kalb G (2012) Who should receive recruitment and retention incentives? Improved targeting of rural doctors using medical workforce data. Aust J Rural Health 20(1):3–10. Scholar
  10. Lenthall S, Wakerman J, Opie T, Dollard M, Dunn S, Knight S, MacLeod M, Watson C (2009) What stresses remote area nurses? Current knowledge and future action. Aust J Rural Health 17(4):208–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mills M, Culbertson S, Fullagar C (2012) Conceptualizing and measuring engagement: an analysis of the utrecht work engagement scale. J Happiness Stud 13(3):519–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nerstad C, Richardsen A, Martinussen M (2010) Factorial validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) across occupational groups in Norway. Scand J Psychol 51(4):326–333Google Scholar
  13. O’Donohue W, Donohue R, Grimmer M (2007) Research into the psychological contract: two Australian perspectives. Hum Res Dev Int 10(3):301–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Onnis L (2014) Managers are the key to workforce stability: an HRM approach towards improving retention of health professionals in remote northern Australia. In: Proceedings, 28th Australia and New Zealand Academy of Management (ANZAM) conference. UTS SydneyGoogle Scholar
  15. Onnis L (2015) An examination of supportive management practices promoting health workforce stability in remote northern Australia. Aust Psychiatry 23(6):679–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Onnis L (2016) A sustainable remote health workforce: translating HRM policy into practice. Ph.D. Thesis. James Cook UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. Onnis L, Pryce J (2016) Health professionals working in remote Australia: a review of the literature. Asia Pac J Hum Resour 54:32–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Opie T, Lenthall S, Wakerman J, Dollard M, MacLeod M, Knight S, Rickard G, Dunn Sandra (2011) Occupational stress in the Australian nursing workforce: a comparison between hospital based nurses and nurses working in very remote communities. Aust J Adv Nurs 28(4):36–43Google Scholar
  19. Purcell J, Hutchinson S (2007) Front-line managers as agents in the HRM-performance causal chain: theory, analysis and evidence. Hum Resour Manage J 17(1):3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Robertson R (2014) Leading on the edge. Wiley, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  21. Russell DJ, Wakerman J, Humphreys JS (2013) What is a reasonable length of employment for health workers in Australian rural and remote primary healthcare services? Aust Health Rev 37(2):256–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M (2006) The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study. Educ Psychol Measur 66(4):701–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seppala P, Mauno S, Feldt T, Hakanen J, Kinnunen U, Tolvanen A, Schaufeli W (2009) The construct validity of the utrecht work engagement scale: multisample and longitudinal evidence. J Happiness Stud 10(4):459–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wright TA, Cropanzano R (2004) The role of psychological well-being in job performance: a fresh look at an age-old quest. Org Dyn 33(4):338–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Xerri M (2013) Workplace relationships and the innovative behaviour of nursing employees: a social exchange perspective. Asia Pac J Hum Res 51(1):103–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Business, Law & GovernanceJames Cook UniversityCairnsAustralia

Personalised recommendations