The Health Communication Advocacy Tool: An Approach Toward Addressing Health Inequity

  • Chervin Lam
  • Marifran Mattson


Health inequity is a global concern that needs to be mitigated. Health inequity may be addressed through health advocacy, which is the act of championing for policy changes so that better health outcomes may result. The Health Communication Advocacy Tool is advanced as a structured approach that advocates may utilize to strategically and effectively conduct health advocacy. The tool consists of three phases: (1) assembling an advocacy team, (2) conducting formative research and designing advocacy messages, and (3) implementing and evaluating the team’s strategy. Given the pervasiveness of health inequity, it is imperative that more health advocacy efforts are initiated. The Health Communication Advocacy Tool offers advocates structure and confidence going forward in pursuing such efforts.


Health inequity Policy Health Communication Advocacy Tool 


  1. Allison, K. R., Dwyer, J. J., & Makin, S. (1999). Self-efficacy and participation in vigorous physical activity by high school students. Health Education & Behavior, 26(1), 12–24. Scholar
  2. Banbury, S. P., Macken, W. J., Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M., (2001). Auditory distraction and short-term memory: Phenomena and practical implications. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 43(1), 12–29. Scholar
  3. Bernheim, B. D., Rangel, A., & Rayo, L. (2006). The power of the last word in legislative policy making. Econometrica, 74(5), 1161–1190. Scholar
  4. Berry, J. G., Bloom, S., Foley, S., & Palfrey, J. S. (2010). Health inequity in children and youth with chronic health conditions. Pediatrics, 126(Supplement 3), S111–S119. Scholar
  5. Bradley, M. M., Greenwald, M. K., Petry, M. C., & Lang, P. J. (1992). Remembering pictures: Pleasure and arousal in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(2), 379–390. Scholar
  6. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Affective reactions to acoustic stimuli. Psychophysiology, 37(2), 204–215. Scholar
  7. Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. The American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294. Retrieved from www.apsanet.orgCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, K. M., Lindenberger, J. H., & Bryant, C. A. (2008). Using pretesting to ensure your messages and materials are on strategy. Health Promotion Practice, 9(2), 116–122. Scholar
  9. Casas-Zamora, J. A., & Ibrahim, S. A. (2004). Confronting health inequity: The global dimension. American Journal of Public Health, 94(12), 2055–2058. Scholar
  10. Chan, A. H., & Courtney, A. J. (2001). Color associations for Hong Kong Chinese. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 28(3), 165–170. Scholar
  11. Cobanoglu, C., Warde, B., & Moreo, P. J. (2001). A comparison of mail, fax and web-based survey methods. International Journal of Market Research, 43(4), 441–452. Retrieved from Scholar
  12. Coulter, R., Cotte, J., & Moore, M. (1999). Believe it or not: Persuasion, manipulation and credibility of guilt appeals. Advances in Consumer Research, 26(1), 288–294. Retrieved from Scholar
  13. Fick, D. M., Cooper, J. W., Wade, W. E., Waller, J. L., Maclean, J. R., & Beers, M. H. (2003). Updating the Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults: Results of a US consensus panel of experts. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163(22), 2716–2724. Scholar
  14. Freudenberg, N., Bradley, S. P., & Serrano, M. (2009). Public health campaigns to change industry practices that damage health: an analysis of 12 case studies. Health Education & Behavior, 36(2), 230–249. Scholar
  15. Guest, G., Namey, E. E., & Mitchell, M. L. (2013). Collecting qualitative data: A field manual for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guttman, N., & Salmon, C. T. (2004). Guilt, fear, stigma and knowledge gaps: Ethical issues in public health communication interventions. Bioethics, 18(6), 531–552. Scholar
  17. Han, H. C. (2009). Does the content of political appeals matter in motivating participation? A field experiment on self-disclosure in political appeals. Political Behavior, 31(1), 103–116. Scholar
  18. Hawkins, R. P., Kreuter, M., Resnicow, K., Fishbein, M., & Dijkstra, A. (2008). Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Education Research, 23(3), 454–466. Scholar
  19. Holm, A. L., & Davis, R. M. (2004). Clearing the airways: Advocacy and regulation for smoke-free airlines. Tobacco Control, 13(suppl 1), i30–i36. Scholar
  20. Huerta, E. E., & Macario, E. (1999). Communicating health risk to ethnic groups: Reaching Hispanics as a case study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 1999(25), 23–26. Retrieved from Scholar
  21. Johansen, M., & LeRoux, K. (2013). Managerial networking in nonprofit organizations: The impact of networking on organizational and advocacy effectiveness. Public Administration Review, 73(2), 355–363. Scholar
  22. Kawachi, I., Subramanian, S. V., & Almeida-Filho, N. (2002). A glossary for health inequalities. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56(9), 647–652. Scholar
  23. Kersh, R. (2000). State autonomy & civil society: The lobbyist connection. Critical Review, 14(2–3), 237–258. Scholar
  24. Kotler, P., & Zaltman, G. (1971). Social marketing: An approach to planned social change. Journal of Marketing, 35(3), 3–12. Retrieved from Scholar
  25. Kreuter, M. W., & Haughton, L. T. (2006). Integrating culture into health information for African American women. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(6), 794–811. Scholar
  26. Kreuter, M. W., Lukwago, S. N., Bucholtz, D. C., Clark, E. M., & Sanders-Thompson, V. (2003). Achieving cultural appropriateness in health promotion programs: Targeted and tailored approaches. Health Education & Behavior, 30(2), 133–146. Scholar
  27. Kristofferson, K., White, K., & Peloza, J. (2014). The nature of slacktivism: How the social observability of an initial act of token support affects subsequent prosocial action. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1149–1166. Scholar
  28. Lindlof, T.R., & Taylor, B. C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Lovejoy, K., Waters, R. D., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 313–318. Scholar
  30. Lupton, D. (1994). Toward the development of critical health communication praxis. Health Communication, 6(1), 55–67. Scholar
  31. Madestam, A., Shoag, D., Veuger, S., & Yanagizawa-Drott, D. (2013). Do political protests matter? Evidence from the Tea Party movement. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(4), 1633–1685. Scholar
  32. Marmot, M., Allen, J., Bell, R., & Goldblatt, P. (2012). Building of the global movement for health equity: From Santiago to Rio and beyond. The Lancet, 379(9811), 181–188. Scholar
  33. Marshall, M. N. (1996). The key informant technique. Family Practice, 13(1), 92–97. Scholar
  34. Mattson, M. (2010). Health advocacy by accident and discipline. Health Communication, 25(6–7), 622–624. Scholar
  35. Mattson, M., & Hall, J. G. (2011). Health as Communication Nexus. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall Hunt.Google Scholar
  36. Mattson, M., & Lam, C. (2015). Health advocacy: A communication approach. New York, NY: Peter-Lang.Google Scholar
  37. McKenna, J. W., & Williams, K. N. (1993). Crafting effective tobacco counteradvertisements: Lessons from a failed campaign directed at teenagers. Public Health Reports, 108, 85. Retrieved from Scholar
  38. Morozov, E. (2012). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
  39. Nabi, R. L. (1999). A cognitive-functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall. Communication Theory, 9(3), 292–320. Scholar
  40. O’Keefe, D. J. (2002). Guilt as a mechanism of persuasion. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 329–344). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Okonofua, F., Lambo, E., Okeibunor, J., & Agholor, K. (2011). Advocacy for free maternal and child health care in Nigeria – Results and outcomes. Health policy, 99(2), 131–138. Scholar
  42. Ottersen, O. P., Dasgupta, J., Blouin, C., Buss, P., Chongsuvivatwong, V., Frenk, J., … & Scheel, I. B. (2014). The political origins of health inequity: Prospects for change. The Lancet, 383(9917), 630–667. Scholar
  43. Ou, L. C., Luo, M. R., Woodcock, A., & Wright, A. (2004). A study of colour emotion and colour preference. Part I: Colour emotions for single colours. Color Research & Application, 29(3), 232–240. Scholar
  44. Panagiotopoulos, P., Sams, S., Elliman, T., & Fitzgerald, G. (2011). Do social networking groups support online petitions?. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 5(1), 20–31. Scholar
  45. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 69–81. Scholar
  46. Pless, I. B. (2007). A chronology of failed advocacy and frustration. Injury Prevention, 13(2), 73–74. Scholar
  47. Ruiter, R. C., Abraham, C., & Kok, G. (2001). Scary warnings and rational precautions: A review of the psychology of fear appeals. Psychology & Health, 16(6), 613–630. Retrieved from Scholar
  48. Sato, H. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework and the policy process analysis: The case of smoking control in Japan. Policy Studies Journal, 27(1), 28–44. Scholar
  49. Shaw, E., & Carter, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: Theoretical antecedents and empirical analysis of entrepreneurial processes and outcomes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(3), 418–434. Scholar
  50. Smith, S. M., & Shaffer, D. R. (2000). Vividness can undermine or enhance message processing: The moderating role of vividness congruency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(7), 769–779. Scholar
  51. Starfield, B. (2011). The hidden inequity in health care. International Journal for Equity in Health, 10(15), 1–3. Scholar
  52. Thomas, C. S., Hrebenar, R. J. (2009). Comparing lobbying across liberal democracies: Problems, approaches and initial findings. Journal of Comparative Politics, 2(1), 131–142. Retrieved from Scholar
  53. Turner, M. M. (2007). Using emotion in risk communication: The anger activism model. Public Relations Review, 33(2), 114–119. Scholar
  54. Verhaeghen, P., Aikman, S. N., & Van Gulick, A. E. (2011). Prime and prejudice: Co-occurrence in the culture as a source of automatic stereotype priming. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 501–518. Scholar
  55. Wells, J. C., Marphatia, A. A., Cole, T. J., & McCoy, D. (2012). Associations of economic and gender inequality with global obesity prevalence: Understanding the female excess. Social Science & Medicine, 75(3), 482–490. Scholar
  56. Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs, 59(4), 329–349. Scholar
  57. Witte, K. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communications Monographs, 61(2), 113–134. Scholar
  58. Woolf, S. H., & Braveman, P. (2011). Where health disparities begin: The role of social and economic determinants – and why current policies may make matters worse. Health Affairs, 30(10), 1852–1859. Scholar
  59. Xie, B., & Jaeger, P. (2008). Older adults and political participation on the internet: A cross-cultural comparison of the USA and China. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 23(1), 1–15. Scholar
  60. Zoller, H. M. (2005). Health activism: Communication theory and action for social change. Communication Theory, 15(4), 341–364. Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chervin Lam
    • 1
  • Marifran Mattson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Communications & New Media (CNM)National University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Brian Lamb School of CommunicationPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations