Advertisement

Development Communication and the Dialogic Space: Finding the Voices Under the Mines

  • Christele J. Amoyan
  • Pamela A. Custodio
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is a written manifesto of the (un)heard voices of a small fisherfolk community in Calancan Bay, Sta. Cruz, Marinduque, the Philippines. It is through following these voices that we came to witness how unsustainable mining transformed a local fishing village into an industrial wasteland. After decades of struggle for socio-economic welfare, environmental rehabilitation, and social justice, the fishers remain in polluted living conditions. Listening to the people’s dialogues and everyday conversations creates a new space for a critical discourse through dialogue. We attempt to link Freirean dialogue and its appropriateness in the process of Development Communication (DevCom) for desirable social change. The main objective of this chapter is to reflect on the space for dialogue in the study of DevCom centred the Calancan Bay fisherfolk’s life stories. The dominant voice of the chapter, the first author—a novice researcher—recounts entering the field to listen and collate the silenced voices and from there, develop a sense of self-reflexivity as she goes along the journey of qualitative research.

Keywords

Development communication Dialogue Praxis Voice Thirdspace Kapwa 

References

  1. Almario, V. S. (Ed.). (2010). UP diksiyonaryong filipino: Binagong edisyon, (2nd ed.). Pasig City, Philippines: Anvil Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Asuncion, D. L. (2004). Marinduque: The heart of the Philippines. Marinduque, PH.Google Scholar
  3. Aronowitz, S. (1993). Paulo Freire’s radical democratic humanism. In P. McLaren & P. Leonard (Eds.), Paulo Freire: A critical encounter (pp. 8–24). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Borch, C. (2002). Interview with Edward W. Soja: Thirdspace, postmetropolis, and social theory. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 3(1), 113–120.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2002.9672816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buber, M. (1958). I and thou. (R. G. Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: Scribner.Google Scholar
  6. Carr, R. S., Nipper, M., & Plumlee, G. S. (2003). Survey of marine contamination from mining-related activities on Marinduque Island, Philippines: Porewater toxicity and chemistry. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 6(4), 369–379.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980390255236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Communication For Social Change Consortium. (2010). The Babel challenge. Retrieved from http://www.communicationforsocialchange.org/mazi-articles.php?id=325
  8. Craig, R. T. (2013). Communication theory and social change. Communication & Social change, 1(1), 5–18.  https://doi.org/10.4471/csc.2013.01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coumans, C. (26 March 1999). Marcopper’s first major mine waste victim continues to suffer. Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism. Retrieved from http://pcij.org/stories/1999/marcopper3.html
  10. Coumans, C. (2002). Case study on Marcopper Mining and the Marinduque disaster. Retrieved from http://www.minesandcommunities.org/article.php?a=1445
  11. Coumans, C. (2003). Will Rising closure costs sink Placer Dome: An investor’s guide to Placer Dome. Retrieved from http://www.miningwatch.ca/sites/www.miningwatch.ca/files/PD_Investor_Brief_0.pdf
  12. Dagron, A. G. (2009). Playing with fire: Power, participation, and communication for development. Development in Practice, 19(4–5), 453–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dagron, A.G., & Tufte, T. (Eds.). (2006). Communication for social change anthology: Historical and contemporary readings (Vols. 1–2). South Orange, NJ: Communication for Social Change Consortium, Inc.Google Scholar
  14. De Guia, K. (2005). Kapwa: The self in the other worldviews and lifestyles of Filipino culture-bearers. Pasig City: Anvil Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Dixon, D. (1999). Between difference and alterity: Engagements with Edward Soja’s thirdspace [Review of the book On thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places, by E. W. Soja]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89(2), 338–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Du Plessis, C. (2010). Sustainable development demands dialogue between developed and developing worlds. Building Research & Information, 27, 378–389.  https://doi.org/10.1080/096132199369219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dutta, M., & Pal, M. (2010). Dialog theory in marginalized settings: A subaltern studies approach. Communication Theory, 20, 363–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dutta, M. (2014). A culture-centered approach to listening: Voices of social change. International Journal of Listening, 28, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Enriquez, V. G. (1986). Kapwa: A core concept in Filipino social psychology. In V. G. Enriquez (Ed.). Philippine world-view. Singapore, SG: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fellizar, Jr., F. P., Velo, W. M. A. H., & Bernardo, R. G. (2002). Ripples of hope over troubled waters: The Calancan Bay experience. Los Baños, Laguna, PH: SEAMEO Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA).Google Scholar
  21. Freire, P. (1970, 1993). Paulo Freire: Pedagogy of the oppressed. (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York, NY: The Continuum International Publishing Group, Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Freire, P. (1985). The politics of education: Culture, power, and liberation. South Hadley, MA.: Bergin & Garvey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1993). A dialogue with Paulo Freire. In P. McLaren & P. Leonard (Eds.), Paulo Freire: A critical encounter (pp. 169–176). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Giroux, H. A. (1993). Paulo Freire and the politics of postcolonialism. In P. McLaren & P. Leonard (Eds.), Paulo Freire: A critical encounter (pp. 177–188). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Groves, T. (2011). Looking up to Paulo Freire: Education and political culture during the Spanish transition to democracy. Pedagogica Historica, 47(5), 701–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hart, R., & Coumans, C. (2013). Evolving standards and expectations for responsible mining, a civil society perspective. Ontario, CA: Mining Watch Canada.Google Scholar
  27. Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Librero, F. (2005). Status and trends in development communication research in the Philippines. Media Asia, 32(1), 35–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lowe, S., & Vettori, L. (Eds.). (2005). Mining ombudsman case report: Marinduque Island. AU: Oxfam Australia.Google Scholar
  30. Massey, G. (2012). Ways of social change: Making sense of modern times. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  31. McLaren, P., & Leonard, P. (Eds.). (1993). Paulo Freire: A critical encounter. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Mefalopulos, P. (2008). Development communication sourcebook: Broadening the boundaries of communication. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morgan, W. J., & Guilherme, A. (2010). I and thou: The educational lessons of Martin Buber’s dialogue with the conflicts of his times. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(9), 979–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Muhi, E. L., Rivera, A. T. F., De Los Reyes, V. C., Lopez, J. M., & Tayag, E. A. (2012). Public health risk assessment of heavy metals in Marinduque Province – 2011. Manila, Philippines: National Epidemiology Center.Google Scholar
  35. Pe-Pua (Ed.) (1982). Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Teorya, metodo at gamit. Quezon City, PH: University of the Philippines Press.Google Scholar
  36. Pe-Pua, R., & Marcelino, E. P. (2000). Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino psychology): A legacy of Virgilio G. Enriquez. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pettit, J., Salazar, J. F., & Gumucio-Dagron, A. (2009). Citizens’ media and communication. Development in Practice, 19(4–5), 443–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Quebral, N. C. (2012). Development communication primer. Penang, MY: Southbound Sdn. Bhd.Google Scholar
  39. Richards, M., Thomas, P. N., & Nain, Z. (Eds.). (2001). Communication and development: The Freirean connection. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  40. Shor, I. (1993). Education is politics: Paulo Freire’s critical pedagogy. In P. McLaren & P. Leonard (Eds.), Paulo Freire: A critical encounter (pp. 25–35). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Social Watch Philippines. (2005). Social Watch Philippines 2005 Report. Quezon, City, PH.Google Scholar
  42. Sorrells, K. (2013). Intercultural communication: Globalization and social justice. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  43. Theunissen, P., & Wan Noordin, W. N. (2012). Revisiting the concept of “dialogue” in public relations. Public Relations Review, 38(1), 5–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.09.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). (2000). Mining and sustainable development II: Challenges and perspectives. Industry and Environment, 23, 1–95.Google Scholar
  45. United Nations. (2007). Participatory dialogue: Toward a stable, safe and just society for all. New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
  46. van Arendonk, A. M. (1985). Toward love and authenticity (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from University Microfilms International. (8602017).Google Scholar
  47. van Maanen, J. (2011). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Development CommunicationThe University of the Philippines Los BañosLos BañosPhilippines

Personalised recommendations