Advertisement

Participatory Communication and Extension for Indigenous Farmers: Empowering Local Paddy Rice Growers in East Java

  • Edi Dwi Cahyono
Chapter

Abstract

It is understood that an effective communication approach might empower society, including the marginalized one. Nevertheless, for the sake of modernization, development agencies tend to administer a conventional top-down communication approach. This approach fails to stimulate capacities of marginal communities, causing social inequality. Therefore, this chapter demonstrates an experience of implementing an alternative approach, known as participatory communication with strong cultured-centered perspectives. A series of interactive extension or facilitation activities is described. The activities were aimed to conserve rare rice varieties and the unique farming practices in an indigenous community’s areas in the eastern region of Java Island. As a result, the farmers were more aware of the values of, and committed to conserve the endangered seed varieties and the related indigenous knowledge and practices; they were also willing to employ their indigenous institution as medium for information exchange regarding the farming system. Moreover, this project is relevant because the local public administration has been paying close attention to indigenous lifestyles for agro-eco tourism attractions recently. The project results suggest that the approach is appropriate to create social change at various levels. It is expected that our experiences will inspire readers to employ the strategic communication approach to empower marginalized communities as a way to achieve sustainable social change/development.

Keywords

Participatory communication and extension Cultured-centered perspective Indigenous knowledge Social change 

References

  1. Alawiyah, F. M., & Cahyono, E. D. (2018). Persepsi petani terhadap introduksi inovasi agens hayati melalui kombinasi media demplot dan FFD. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis, 2(1), 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almekinders, C. J. M, Louwaars, N. P., & de Bruijn, G. H. (1994). Local seed system and their importance for an improved seed supply in developing countries. Euphytica, 78(3), 2007–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentley, J. W., & Vasques, D. (1998). The seed potato system in Bolivia: Organisational growth and missing links. London: ODI. Retrieved from https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/5154.pdf
  4. Bessette, G. & Rajasunderam, C. V. (Eds.) (1996). Participatory development communication: A West African agenda. Ottawa: IDRC.Google Scholar
  5. Boon, K. F. (2009). A Critical history of change in agricultural extension and considerations for future policies and programs. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Adelaide).Google Scholar
  6. Cahyono, E. D. (2007). Integrasi pengetahuan asli dalam revitalisasi pertanian dalam upaya untuk meningkatkan kesejahteraan petani. PERHEPI Proceeding of the Konperensi Nasional Ke XV Perhimpunan Ekonomi Pertanian Indonesia. Central Java: Surakarta (pp. 71–77). Retrieved from http://karyailmiah.fp.ub.ac.id/fp/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Jurnal-Perhepi-EDC.pdf
  7. Cahyono, E. D. (2014). Challenges facing extension agents in implementing the participatory extension approach in Indonesia: A case study of Malang Regency in the East Java Region. (Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University). Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=osu1404402942&disposition=inline
  8. Cahyono, E. D., & Agunga, R. (2016). Policy and practice of participatory extension in Indonesia: A case study of extension agents in Malang District, East Java Province. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education (JIAEE). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314299456
  9. Coomes, O. T., McGuire, S. J., Garine, E., Caillon, S., McKey, D., Demeulenaere, E., … & Emperaire, L. (2015). Farmer seed networks make a limited contribution to agriculture? Four common misconceptions. Food Policy, 56, 41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dutta, M. J., Ban, Z., & Pal, M. (2012). Engaging worldviews, cultures, and structures through dialogue: The culture-centred approach to public relations. Prism, 92(2). Retrieved from http://www.prismjournal.org/fileadmin/9_2/Dutta_Ban_Pal.pdf
  11. Dyer, G. A., López-Feldman, A., Yúnez-Naude, A., & Taylor, J. E. (2014). Genetic erosion in maize’s center of origin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(39), 14094–14099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. FAO Expert Consultation on Communication for Rural Development. (2011). Communication for Development: Meeting today’s agriculture and rural development challenges. Rome, Italy: FAO.Google Scholar
  13. Flora, C. (1992). Reconstructing Agriculture: The Case for Local Knowledge. Rural Sociology, 57(1), pp. 92–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fougère, M., & Harding, N. (2012). On the limits of that can be said about ‘innovation’: Interplay and contrasts between academic and policy discourses. In K. Sveiby, P. Gripenberg, & B. Segercrantz (Eds.), Challenging the innovation paradigm (pp. 15–36). New York; London: Routledge -Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  15. Fraser, C.F., & Villet, J. (1994). Communication: A key to human development. FAO.Google Scholar
  16. Freire, P. (2005). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  17. Garforth, Chris. (2001). Agricultural knowledge and information system in Hagaz, Eritrea. UK: International and Rural Development Department - The University of Reading.Google Scholar
  18. Grenier, L. (1998). Working with indigenous knowledge: A guide for researcher. Canada: International Development Research Centre. Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  19. Haile, A., Verkuijl, H., Mwangi, W. M., & Yallew, A. (1998). Farmers’ wheat seed sources and seed management in the Enebssie area, Ethiopia. CIMMYT.Google Scholar
  20. Itin, C. M. (1999). Reasserting the philosophy of experiential education as a vehicle for change in the 21st century. The Journal of Experiential Education, 22(2), 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Inggrida, J. A., Sukesi, K., & Cahyono, E. D. (2017). The role of communication in mount kelud eruption disaster management program (Case study in Ngantru Village, Ngantang District, Malang). HABITAT, 28(2), 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keller, G. B., Mndiga, H., & Maass, B. L. (2005). Diversity and genetic erosion of traditional vegetables in Tanzania from the farmer’s point of view. Plant Genetic Resources, 3(3), 400–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  24. Kroma, M. M. (2006). Organic farmer networks: Facilitating learning and innovation for sustainable agriculture. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 28(4), 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kurniasari, D.A., Cahyono, E.D., & Yuliati, Y. (2018). Cultural capital as support for development: A case traditional tourism village Samin. Scholars Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences 6(3): 683–687. doi: https://doi.org/10.21276/sjahss.2018.6.3.29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laikre, L. (2010). Genetic diversity is overlooked in international conservation policy implementation. Conservation Genetics, 11(2), 349–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maarthen, N. M., Cahyono, E. D., & Wahyuni, T. (2006). Evaluasi hubungan peran organisasi non-pemerintah (Ornop) dengan lembaga penyuluhan dalam pengembangan pertanian organik. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial (Social Sciences), 18(1), 66–73. Retrieved from http://karyailmiah.fp.ub.ac.id/fp/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Jurnal-Ilmu-Sosial-Vol-18-No-1.pdf
  28. MacBride, S. (1980). Many voices, one world. London: UNESCO – Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  29. McGuire, S., & Sperling, L. (2016). Seed systems smallholder farmers use. Food Security, 8(1), 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Malahayatin, D. M., & Cahyono, E. D. (2017). Faktor kesesuaian dengan kebutuhan petani dalam keputusan adopsi inovasi pola tanam jajar legowo (Studi kasus petani padi di Kecamatan Widang, Kabupaten Tuban). Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis, 1(1), 56–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Melkianus, P., Sugiyanto, Sukesi, K., & Cahyono, E. D. (2018). The role of actors in determining pattern of communication network of eucalyptus oil processor farmers (Case Study in Waisala District, West Seram Regency, Maluku Province). International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT), 7(2), 198–205Google Scholar
  32. Nair, K.S., & White, S,A. (1994). Participatory development communication as cultural renewal. In S.A. White, K.S. Nair, & J. Ascroft (Eds.), Participatory communication: Working for change and development (pp. 345–358). New Delhi-Thousand Oak-London: SAGE Publication.Google Scholar
  33. Ninth United Nations Communication for Development Roundtable. (2004). Communication for development roundtable report focus on sustainable development. Rome, Italy: FAO with the Government of Italy, UNESCO, World Bank, IDRC, CTA.Google Scholar
  34. Noviyanti, & Cahyono, E. D. (2016, August). Persepsi dan tipe keputusan petani padi terhadap inovasi agen hayati di Madura. Proceeding of the Konferensi Nasional Penyuluhan dan Komunikasi Pembangunan. Malang: UB Hotel (pp. 284–292)Google Scholar
  35. Pandey, A., Bisht, I. S., Bhat, K. V., & Mehta, P. S. (2011). Role of informal seed system in promoting landrace diversity and their on-farm conservation: A case study of rice in Indian Himalayas. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 58(8), 1213–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Purnamaningsih, S. R., Cahyono, E. D., & Tyasmoro, S. Y. (2007). Studi persepsi tentang varitas dan eksplorasi manajemen benih padi lokal(Tahun I). Malang: Universitas Brawijaya.Google Scholar
  37. Purnamaningsih, S. R., Cahyono, E. D., & Tyasmoro, S. Y. (2008).Studi persepsi tentang varitas dan eksplorasi manajemen benih padi lokal(Tahun II). Malang: Universitas Brawijaya.Google Scholar
  38. Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community. The American Prospect, 4(13), 35–42.Google Scholar
  39. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. In Culture and politics (pp. 223–234). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Rajasekaran, B. (1993). Indigenous technical practices in a rice-based farming system. Ames: Center for Indigenous Knowledge for Agriculture and Rural Development.Google Scholar
  41. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  42. Rohrbach, D., & Kiala, D. (2000). Development options for local seed systems in Mozambique. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Po Box 776, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe..Google Scholar
  43. Saad, N., Sperling, L., & Ashby, J. A. (2009). Farmers and plant genetic resources. BIOTECHNOLOGY-Volume VIII: Fundamentals in Biotechnology, 8, 291.Google Scholar
  44. Seboka, B., & Deressa, A. (1999). Validating farmers’ indigenous social networks for local seed supply in Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 6(4), 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Servaes, J., & Malikhao, P. (2005). Participatory communication: The new paradigm. Media & global change. Rethinking communication for development, 91–103.Google Scholar
  46. Shinta, A., & Cahyono, E.D. (2006). Eksplorasi pengetahuan asli (indigenous knowledge) petani dalam sistem pertanian padi berbasis benih lokal. Malang: LPPM Universitas Brawijaya.Google Scholar
  47. Siwalette, J. D., Hidayat, K., Cahyono, E. D., & Purnomo, M. (2018). Transformation of production organization of dusung based nutmeg plantation (Case study of industrial and farmers’ partnership in Hila Village, Moluccas Province). Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(3), 23–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.53.4248
  48. Smith, L. T. (2013). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed books.Google Scholar
  49. Sperling, L., & McGuire, S. (2010). Understanding and strengthening informal seed markets. Experimental Agriculture, 46(2), 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Susilowati, S., & Cahyono, E.D. (2004). Evaluasi kesetaraaan jender dalam proses produksi dan pemasaran padi organik. Malang: Universitas Katolik Widya Karya.Google Scholar
  51. Swari, R. N. I., & Cahyono, E. D. (2016). Kearifan lokal petani tuban dan strategi komunikasi untuk melestarikan tradisi terkait vegetasi endemik BOGOR. Proceeding of the Konferensi NasionalPenyuluhan dan Komunikasi Pembangunan. Malang: UB Hotel (pp. 143–156)Google Scholar
  52. The Communication Initiative, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), & The World Bank. (2007). World congress on communication for development: Lessons, challenges, and the way forward. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development /The World BankGoogle Scholar
  53. Timsina, N. P., & Upreti, B. R. (2005). Loosing traditional seed management systems: A threat to small farmers’ food security in Nepal. University of Reading, International and Rural Development Department, Reading—King’s College London, School of Social Sciences and Public Policy, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  54. UNDP. (1994). Communication: A key to human development. Rome: FAO. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/docrep/t1815e/t1815e00.htm
  55. United Nations Development Programme. (2011). Communication for development: Strengthening the effectiveness of the United Nations. New York, NY; Oslo, Norway: Governance Centre.Google Scholar
  56. UNESCO. (1980). Communication and society today and tomorrow many voices one world: Towards a new more just and more efficient world information and communication order. Paris-London-New York. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/52132938/Many-Voices-One-World-The-MacBride-Report-1980
  57. UNESCO - United Nations Educational, Cultural and Scientific Organization. (2007). Toward a common system approach: Achieving the Millennium Development Goals, Report of the 10th UN Inter-Agency Round Table on Communication for Development. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: UNESCOGoogle Scholar
  58. UNESCO. (2005). World report towards knowledge societies. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  59. United Nations. (1992). Convention on biological diversity. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/doc/l44egal/cbd-en.pdf
  60. Vanclay, F., & Lawrence, G. (1995). The environmental imperative: Eco-social concerns for Australian agriculture. Rockhampton: Central Queensland University Press.Google Scholar
  61. van Heerwaarden, J., Hellin, J., Visser, R. F., & Van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2009). Estimating maize genetic erosion in modernized smallholder agriculture. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 119(5), 875–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. White, S. A. (Ed.). (1999). The art of facilitating participation: Releasing the power of grassroots communication. New Delhi: Sage publications.Google Scholar
  63. Yoon, C.S. (1996). Participatory Communication for Development. In Bessette, G. & Rajasunderam, C. V. (Eds.). Participatory development communication: A West African agenda (37–61). Ottawa: IDRC.Google Scholar
  64. Yoon, C. S. (2004). Participatory communication for development. Penang, Malaysia: Southbond. Retrieved from http://www.southbound.com.my/communication/parcom.htm
  65. Zamora, O. B. (2000, April). Sustainable agriculture: The framework, misconceptions, myths and barriers to adoption. Proceeding of the seminar-workshop on development of curriculum on sustainable agriculture for Indonesia universities. Symposium conducted at Brawijaya University, Malang.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edi Dwi Cahyono
    • 1
  1. 1.Socio-Economic Department, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of BrawijayaMalangIndonesia

Personalised recommendations