Advertisement

Feed Enzymes: Source and Applications

  • Poonam Singh
  • Sanjay Kumar Yadav
Chapter

Abstract

Enzymes are found in all living organisms, including microorganisms, plants, animals, and humans; and control all vital reactions. Enzymes can be produced by a diverse group of organisms through various production processes such as submerged and solid-state fermentation through microorganisms. Among all organisms, microorganisms are the more prominent and suitable host to produce stable and industrially important enzymes. Enzymes are used in different industries including the animal feed industry. Some common enzymes that participate in the preparation of animal feed are phytase, protease, alpha-amylase, xylanases, beta-glucanases, xyloglucanases, galactomannanases, pectinases, arabinofuranosidases, and ferulic acid esterases. Hydrolytic enzymes remove antinutritional factors from feed ingredients and enhance feed digestibility in animal gut.

Keywords

Microorganism Submerged Phytase Hydrolyzed Enzyme Feed Xylanase Animal Fermentation 

References

  1. Anguita MN, Canibe JF, Perez JBB (2006) Influence of the amount of dietary fiber on the available energy from hindgut fermentation in growing pigs: use of cannulated pigs and in vitro fermentation. J Anim Sci 84:2766–2778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anisa SK, Girish K (2014) Pectinolytic activity of Rhizopus sp. and Trichoderma viride. Int J Res Pure Appl Microbiol 4(2):28–31Google Scholar
  3. Arambel MJ, Weidmeier RD, Walters JL (1987) Influence of donor animal adaptation to added yeast culture and/or Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract on in vitro rumen fermentation. Nutr Rep Int 35:433–437Google Scholar
  4. Aunstrup K (1979) Production isolation and economics of extracellular enzyme. Appl Biochem Bioeng 2:27–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Autio K, Salmenkallio-Marttila M (2001) Light microscopic investigations of cereal grains, doughs and breads. Lebensm Wiss Technol 34:18–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Babalola TOO, Apata DF, Atteh JO (2006) Effect of β- xylanase supplementation of boiled castor seed meal-based diets on the performance, nutrient absorbability and some blood constituents of pullet chicks. Trop Sci 46(4):216–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barletta A (2010) In: Bedford MR, Partridge GG (eds) Enzymes in farm animal nutrition, 2nd edn. CABI Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Beg QK, Kapoor M, Mahajan L, Hoondal GS (2001) Microbial xylanases and their industrial applications: a review. Appl Micobiol Biotechnol 56:326–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beylot MH, Mckie VA, Voragen AGJ, Doeswijk-Voragen CHL, Gilbert HJ (2001) The Pseudomonas cellulosa glycoside hydrolase family 51 arabino-furanosidase exhibits wide substrate specificity. Biochem J 358:607–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borneman WS, Hartley RD, Morrison WH, Akin DE, Ljungdahl G (1990) Feruloyl and p-coumaroyl esterase from anaerobic fungi in relation to plant cell wall degradation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 33:345–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen H, Li XL, Ljungdahi LG (1997) Sequencing of a 1, 3-1, 4-β-D Glucanase (Lichenase) from the anaerobic fungus orpinomyces strain PC-2: properties of the enzyme expressed in Escherichia coli and evidence that the gene has a bacterial origin. J Bacteriol 179(19):6028–6034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coelho MB, Kornegay ET (1999) Phytases in animal nutrition and management: a practical reference manual. 2nd rev edn., BASF Monograph Series. BASF Corp, ParsippanyGoogle Scholar
  13. Coen JA, Dehority BA (1970) Degradation and utilization of hemicellulose from intact forages by pure cultures of rumen bacteria. Appl Microbiol 20:362–368PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Collins T, Gerday C, Feller G (2005) Xylanases, xylanase families and extremophilic xylanases. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Couto SR, Sanroman MA (2006) Application of solid state fermentation to food industry – a review. J Food Eng 76:291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cowieson AJ, Aureali R, Guggenbuhl P, Fru-Nji F (2015) Possible involvement of myo-inositol in the physiological response of broilers to high doses of microbial phytase. Anim Prod Sci 55:710–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Degrassi G, Vindigni A, Venturi VA (2003) Thermostable Darabinofuranosidase from xylanolytic Bacillus pumilus: purification and characterization. J Biotechnol 101:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dehority BA, Scott HW (1967) Extent of cellulose and hemicelluloses digestion in various forages by pure cultures of rumen bacteria. J Dairy Sci 50:1136–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De-Vries RP, Kester HCM, Poulsen CH, Benen JAE, Visser J (2000) Synergy between enzymes from Aspergillus involved in the degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides. Carbohydr Res 327:401–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duy ML, Fojan P, Azem E, Pettersson D, Pedersen NR (2013) Visualization of the anticaging effect of RONOZYME® WX xylanase on wheat substrates. Cereal Chem 90(5):439–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eda S, Kato K (1978) An Arabinoxyloglucan isolated from the midrib of the leaves of Nicotina tabacum. Agric Biol Chem 42:351–357Google Scholar
  22. Ewing WR (1963) Poultry nutrition. 5th rev edn., The Ray Ewing Co., South PasadenaGoogle Scholar
  23. Fish NM, Lilly MD (1984) The interection between fermentation and protein recovery. Biotechnology 2:623–627Google Scholar
  24. Ghorai S, Banik SP, Verma D, Chowdhury S, Mukherjee S, Khowala S (2009) Fungal biotechnology in food and feed processing. Food Res Int 42:577–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gorlach JM, Van Der Knaap E, Walton JD (1998) Cloning and targeted disruption of MLG1, a gene encoding two of three extracellular mixed linked Glucanases of Cochliobolus carbonum. Appl Environ Microbial 64:385–391Google Scholar
  26. Gummadi SN, Panda T (2003) Purification and biochemical properties of microbial pectinases – a review. Process Biochem 38:987–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gupta R, Gigras P, Mohapatra H, Goswami VK, Chauhan B (2003) Microbial α-amylases: a biotechnological perspective. Process Biochem 38:1599–1616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hashimoto T, Nakata Y (2003) Synergistic degradation of arabinoxylan with D-L-arabinofuranosidase, xylanase and E-xylosidase from soy sauce koji mold, Aspergillus oryzae, in high salt condition. J Biosci Bioeng 95:164–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hayashi T (1989) Xyloglucans in the primary cell wall. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 40:139–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoondal GS, Tiwari RP, Tiwari R, Dahiya N, Beg QK (2000) Microbial alkaline pectinases and their applications: a review. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59:409–418Google Scholar
  31. Kathiresan K, Manivannan S (2006) α-Amylase production by Penicillium fellutanum isolated from mangrove rhizosphere soil. Afr J Biotechnol 5:829–832Google Scholar
  32. Kato Y, Iki K, Matsuda K (1981) Cell-Wall polysaccharides of immature barely plants. II characterisation of a xyloglucan. Agric Biol Chem 45:2745–2753Google Scholar
  33. Konsoula Z, Liakopoulou-Kyriakides M (2007) Co-production of alpha-amylase and beta-galactosidase by Bacillus subtilis in complex organic substrates. Bioresour Technol 98:150–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Koseki T, Okuda M, Sudah S, Kizaki Y, Iwano K, Aramaki I, Matsuzawa H (2003) Role of two D-L-arabinofuranosidases in arabinoxylan degradation and characteristics of the encoding genes from shochu koji molds, aspergillus kawachii and aspergillus awamori. J Biosci Bioeng 96:232–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krueger NA, Adesogan AT, Staples CR, Krueger WK, Dean DB, Littell RC (2008) The potential to increase digestibility of tropical grasses with a fungal, ferulic acid esterase enzyme preparation. Anim Feed Sci Technol 145:95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee RC, Hrmova M, Burton RA, Lahnstein J, Fincher GB (2003) Bifunctional family 3 glycoside hydrolases from barley with D-Larabinofuranosidase and E-D-Xylosidase activity: characterization, primary structures, and COOH-terminal. J Biol Chem 278:5377–5387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lemme AV, Ravindran V, Bryden WL (2001) Ileal digestibility of amino acids in feed ingredients for broilers. Worlds Poult Sci J 60:423–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Linder MB, Qiao M, Laumen F, Selber K, Hyytia T, Nakari-Setala T, Penttila ME (2004) Efficient purification of recombinant proteins using hydrophobins as tags in surfactant-based two-phase systems. Biochemistry 43(37):11873–11882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Margolles-Clark E, Tenkanen M, Nakari-Setala T, Penttila M (1996) Cloning of genes encoding D-L-arabinofuranosidase and E-xylosidase from Trichoderma reesei by expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:3840–3846PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Marquardt RR, Brufau J (1997) Future of feed enzymes: orientation and perspectives. In: Morand-Fehr P (ed) Feed manufacturing in southern Europe new challenges. CIHEAM, Zaragoza, pp 181–187Google Scholar
  41. Mccleary BV (1988) Purification of (1 → 3), (1 → 4)-beta-d-glucan from barley flour. Methods Enzymol 160:511–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McCleary BV, Matheson NK (1976) Galactomannan utilization in germinating legume seeds. Phytochemistry 15:43–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miller JNB (1986) An introduction to pectins: structure and properties. In: Fishman ML, Jem JJ (eds) Chemistry and functions of pectins, ACS Symposium Series 310. American Chemical Society, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  44. Nethaji M, Pattabhi V (1988) Structure of 3-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2- propenoic acid (ferulic acid). Acta Cryst 44:275–277Google Scholar
  45. Panagiotou G, Granouillet P, Olsson L (2006) Production and partial characterization of arabinoxylan-degrading enzymes by Penicillium brasilianum under solidstate fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 27:1117–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Parsons CM, Castanon F, Han Y (1997) Protein and amino acid digestibility of meat and bone meal. Poult Sci 71:133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pauly M (1999) A xyloglucan-specific Endo-β-1, 4-Glucanase from aspergillus aculeatus: expression cloning in yeast, purification and characterization of the recombinant enzyme. Glycobiology 9:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Polizeli MLTM, Rizzatti ACS, Monti R, Terenzi HF, Jorge JA, Amorim DS (2005) Xylanases from fungi properties and industrial applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 67:577–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Powlowski J, Mahajan S, Schapria M, Master ER (2009) Substrate recognition and hydrolysis by fungal xyloglucan-specific family 12 Hydrase. Carbohydr Res 344:1175–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rahman SAKM, Kato K, Kawai S, Takamizawa K (2003) Substrate specificity of the D-L-arabinofuranosidase from Rhizomucor pusillus HHT-1. Carbohydr Res 338:1469–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rana NK, Bhat TK (2005) Effect of fermentation system on the production and properties of tannase of Aspergillus niger var tieghem MTCC 2425. J Gen Appl Microbiol 51:203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ravindran V, Bryden WL, Kornegay ET (1995) Phytases: occurrence, bioavailability and implications in poultry nutrition. Poultry Avian Biol Rev 6:125–143Google Scholar
  53. Ravn JL, Martens HJ, Pettersson D, Pedersen NR (2015) Enzymatic solubilisation and degradation of soybean fibre demonstrated by viscosity, fibre analysis and microscopy. Int J Biol 7.  https://doi.org/10.5539/JSA.V7N9P1
  54. Reddy NR, Sathe SK, Salunkhe DK (1982) Phytates in legumes and cereals. Adv Food Res 28:1–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Saha BC (2000) D-L-Arabinofuranosidases: biochemistry, molecular biology and application in biotechnology. Biotechnol Adv 18:403–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Selle PH, Ravindran V, Caldwell RA, Bryden WL (2000) Phytate and phytase: consequences for protein utilisation. Nutr Res Rev 13:255–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Spagna G, Andreani F, Salatelli E, Romagnoli D, Casarini D, Pifferi PG (1998) Immobilization of the glycosidases: D-L-arabinofuranosidase and E-Dglucopyranosidase from aspergillus niger on a chitosan derivative to increase the aroma of wine. Part II. Enzym Microb Technol 23:413–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Svihus B, Hetland H (2001) Ileal starch digestibility in growing broiler chickens fed on a wheat-based diet is improved by mash feeding, dilution with cellulose or whole wheat inclusion. Br Poult Sci 42:633–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tanyildizi MS, Ozer D, Elibol M (2005) Optimization of α-amylase production by Bacillus sp. using response surface methodology. Process Biochem 40:2291–2296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Twomey LN, Pluske JR, Rowe JB, Choc M, Brown W, McConnell MF, Pethick DW (2003) The effects of increasing levels of soluble non-starch polysaccharides and inclusion of feed enzymes in dog diets on faecal quality and digestibility. Anim Feed Sci Technol 108(1–4):71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wallis I (1996) Enzymes in poultry nutrition, Technical Note. SAC, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  62. Walsh GA, Power RF, Headon DR (1993) Enzyme in the animal – feed industry. Trends Biotechnol 11(10):424–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wood PJ (2010) Review Oat and rye β-glucan: properties and function. Cereal Chem 87:315–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yu B, Wu ST, Liu CC, Gauthier R, Chiou PWS (2007) Effects of enzyme inclusion in a maize – soybean diet on broiler performance. Anim Feed Sci Technol 134:283–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zeng ZK, Wang D, Piao XS, Li PF, Zhang HY, Shi CX, Yu SK (2014) Effects of adding super dose phytase to the phosphorus-deficient diets of young pigs on growth performance, bone quality, minerals and amino acid digestibilities. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 27:237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Poonam Singh
    • 1
  • Sanjay Kumar Yadav
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Molecular and Cellular EngineeringSHIATSAllahabadIndia

Personalised recommendations