Advertisement

The FNA Clinic

  • Annette L. Salillas
Chapter

Abstract

Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) is a simple, quick and inexpensive method that is used to sample superficial and deep seated masses. It causes minimal trauma to the patient and carries virtually no risk of complications.

FNAC need not be confined to the hospital environment and may be performed almost anywhere, provided the basic conditions of safety are satisfied.

An FNAC clinic room requires a receiving area, an examination couch/bed or a chair with adjustable back rest with access from both sides, writing desk with computer and printer, work surface, a microscope with or without camera, a sink, an examination tray for instruments, staining area, slide drawer cabinets, cabinets for reagents, supplies, result folders, and good lighting and air conditioning.

The duration and frequency of an FNAC clinic is variable and depends on demand. The quick turn-around time of this method allows patients to return to their primary physician within 30 minutes to an hour.

References

  1. 1.
    Kocjan G. Fine needle aspiration cytology. Chapter 2. In: Diagnostic principles and dilemmas. Berlin: Springer; 2006. p. 3–9.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoda RS. Why pathologists should take needle aspiration specimens. Cytopathology. 1995;6(6):419–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dray M, Mayall F, Darlington A. Improved fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology results with a near patient diagnosis service for breast lesions. Cytopathology. 2000;11(1):32–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coghill SB, Brown LA. Why pathologists should take needle aspiration specimens. Cyopathology. 1995;6(1):1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fessia L, Botta G, Arisio R, Verga M, Aimone V. Fine needle aspiration of breast lesions: role and accuracy in a review of 7,495 cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 1987;3(2):121–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Howat AJ. Why pathologists should take needle aspiration specimens. Cytopathology. 1995;6(6):419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh NRD, Berney M, Calaminici MT, Sheaff T, Wells A. Inadequate rates are lower when FNAC samples are taken by cytopathologists. Cytopathology. 2003;14(6):327–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nasuti JF, Gupta PK, Baloch ZW. Diagnostic value and cost –effectiveness of on-site evaluation of fine needle aspiration specimens: review of 5,688 cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002;27(1):1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown LA, Coghill SB. Cost effectiveness of a fine needle aspiration clinic. Cytopathology. 1992;3(5):275–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lieu D. Fine needle aspiration technique and smear preparation. Am Fam Physician. 1997;55(3):839–46, 853-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mayall F, Denford A, Chang B, Darlington A. Improved fNA cytology results with a near patient diagnosis service for non-breast lesions. J Clin Pathol. 1998;51(7):541–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stanley MW. Cost benefit and outcomes analysis for fine needle aspiration. Why do we know so little? Clin Lab Med. 1999;19(4):773–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Young NA, Mody DR, Davey DD. Misinterpretation of normal cellular elements in fine needle aspiration biopsy specimens: observations from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Non-Gynecologic Cytopathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002;126(6):670–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gherardi G. Fine needle aspiration of biopsy of superficial and deep masses. Milan: Springer; 2009. p. 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barnes L. Surgical pathology of the head and neck, vol. 1. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 2001. p. 17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annette L. Salillas
    • 1
  1. 1.MHAM College of Medicine, Perpetual Succour HospitalCebu CityPhilippines

Personalised recommendations