Advertisement

Factors Impacting Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology and Algorithm for Cytological Diagnosis in the Japanese System for Reporting FNA Cytology

  • Kennichi KakudoEmail author
  • Marc Pusztaszeri
  • Massimo Bongiovanni
Chapter

Abstract

Since borderline/precursor thyroid tumors are now established in the thyroid tumor classification, the next required step is to establish cytological categories to accomodate these tumors. How to handle these categories is the key for diagnostic system for thyroid FNA cytology. The Japanese diagnostic system is a histological-oriented classification by which the indeterminate category is sub-classifies into follicular adenoma/follicular carcinoma (RAS-like tumor) lineage and papillary carcinoma (BRAF-like tumor) lineage. The author proposed several histological type oriented classifications of thyroid FNA cytology in this chapter which were modified from the Japanese system. The author believes they are useful for selection of optimal molecular tests and/or ancillary tests for more definite diagnoses of indeterminate nodules. This is the key to solve the problems with the so-called indeterminate categories. With the aide of available clinical tests, including molecular tests, more definite diagnosis will help reduceing numbers of diagnostic surgery and over treatment of indolent thyroid tumors.

References

  1. 1.
    The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Task Force on Standards of Practice. Guidelines of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology for the examination of fine-needle aspiration specimens from thyroid nodules. Diagn Cytopathol. 1996;15:84–9. (also simultaneously published in Mod Pathol 1996; 9:710–5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baloch ZW, LiVolsi VA, Asa SL, et al. Diagnostic terminology and morphologic criteria for cytologic diagnosis of thyroid lesions: a synopsis of the National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;36:425–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ali SZ, Cibas ES, editors. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Definitions, criteria and explanatory notes. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 1–166.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lobo C, McQueen A, Beale T, et al. The UK royal college of pathologists’ thyroid fine-needle aspiration diagnostic classification: is a robust tool for the clinical management of abnormal thyroid nodules. Acta Cytol. 2011;55:499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Perros P, Colley S, Boelaert K, et al. Guidelines for the management of thyroid cancer Third edition British Thyroid Association Chap 5.1 pages 19–24. Clin Endocrinol. 2014;81(Suppl 1):1–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fadda G, Basolo F, Bondi A, et al. Cytological classification of thyroid nodules. Proposal of the SIAPEC-IAP Italian consensus working group. Pathologica. 2010;102:405–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nardi F, Basolo F, Crescenzi A, et al. Italian consensus for the classification and reporting of thyroid cytology. J Endocrinol Investig. 2014;37:593–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Japan Thyroid Association Guidelines. Clinical Practice for the Management of Thyroid Nodules in Japan. Tokyo: Nankodo Publishing Co.; 2013. p. 1–277; (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kakudo K, Kameyama K, Miyauchi A, et al. Introducing the reporting system for thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology according to the new guidelines of the Japan Thyroid Association. Endocr J. 2014;61:539–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kameyama K, Sasaki E, Sugino K, et al. The Japanese Thyroid Association reporting system of thyroid aspiration cytology and experience from a high-volume center, especially in indeterminate category. J Basic Clin Med. 2015;4:70–4.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sugino K, Kameyama K, Ito K. Characteristics and outcome of thyroid cancer patients with indeterminate cytology. J Basic Clin Med. 2015;4:92–8.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Satoh S, Yamashita H, Kakudo K. Thyroid cytology: the Japanese system and experience at Yamashita Thyroid Hospital. J Pathol Transl Med. 2017;51:548–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kakudo K, Kameyama K, Hirokawa M, et al. Subclassification of follicular neoplasms recommended by the Japan thyroid association reporting system of thyroid cytology. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:938305.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/938305.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kakudo K, Higuchi M, Horokawa M, et al. Thyroid FNA cytology in Asian practice—active surveillance for indeterminate thyroid nodules reduces overtreatment of thyroid carcinomas. Cytopathology. 2017;28(6):455–66.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cyt.12491.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kakudo K, Kameyama K, Miyauchi A. History of thyroid cytology and reporting system recommended by the Japan Thyroid Association. J Basic Clin Med. 2013;2:10–5.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bychkov A, Keelawat S, Agarwal S, et al. Impact of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features on the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: a multi-institutional study in five Asian countries. Pathology. 2018;50(4):411–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haugen BR, Sawka AM, Alexander EK, et al. The ATA Guidelines on management of thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer task force review and recommendation on the proposed renaming of eFVPTC without invasion to NIFTP. Thyroid. 2017;27:481–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, et al. Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2009;19:1167–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lloyd RV, Osamura RY, Klöppel G, et al., editors. WHO classification of tumours of endocrine organs (4th edition). Lyon: IARC; 2017.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2015;26:1–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kakudo K, Kameyama K, Takano T. Thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology: current and future. Proposal of a new diagnostic system for reporting thyroid cytology. J Basic Clin Med. 2015;4:110–4.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hirokawa M, Carney JA, Goellner JR, et al. Observer variation of encapsulated follicular lesions of the thyroid gland. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26:1508–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chan J. Strict criteria should be applied in the diagnosis of encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;117:16–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Renshaw AA, Gould EW. Why there is the tendency to “overdiagnose” the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;117:19–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lloyd RV, Erickson LA, Casey MB, et al. Observer variation in the diagnosis of follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28:1336–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ohori NP. FNA cytopathology and molecular test characteristics in the changing landscape of papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Basic Clin Med. 2015;4:103–9.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cipriani NA, Nagar S, Kaplan SP, et al. Follicular thyroid carcinoma: how have histologic diagnosis changed in the last half-century and what are the prognostic implications? Thyroid. 2015;25:1209–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mehrzad R, Nishino M, Connolly J, et al. The relationship between the follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer and follicular adenomas. Surgery. 2016 May;159(5):1396–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tallini G, Tuttle RM, Ghossein RA. The history of the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kakudo K, Bai Y, Katayama S, et al. Classification of follicular cell tumors of the thyroid gland: analysis involving Japanese patients from one institute. Pathol Int. 2009;59:359–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu J, Singh B, Tallini G, et al. Follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of a problematic entity. Cancer. 2006;107:1255–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rivera M, Ricarte-Filho J, Knauf J, et al. Molecular genotyping of papillary thyroid carcinoma follicular variant according to its histological subtypes (encapsulated vs infiltrative) reveals distinct BRAF and RAS mutation patterns. Mod Pathol. 2010;23:1191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liu Z, Zhou G, Nakamura M, Koike E, et al. Encapsulated follicular thyroid tumor with equivocal nuclear changes, so called well-differentiated tumor of uncertain malignant potential: a morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular appraisal. Cancer Sci. 2011;102:288–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kakudo K, Bai Y, Liu Z, et al. Classification of thyroid follicular cell tumors: with special reference to borderline lesions. Endocr J. 2012;59:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kakudo K, Bai Y, Liu Z, et al. Encapsulated papillary thyroid carcinoma, follicular variant: a misnormer. Pathol Int. 2012;62:155–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kakudo K, Wakasa T, Ohta Y, et al. Prognostic classification of thyroid follicular cell tumors using Ki-67 labelling index: risk stratification of thyroid follicular cell carcinomas. Endocr J. 2015;62:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Piana S, Frasoldati A, Di Felice E, et al. Encapsulated well-differentiated follicular-patterned thyroid carcinomas do not play a significant role in the fatality rates from thyroid carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34:868–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Geffredo P, Cheung K, Roman SA, et al. Can minimally invasive follicular thyroid cancer be approached as a benign lesion? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:767–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vivero M, Kraft S, Barletta J. Risk stratification of follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 2013;23:273–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ganly I, Wang L, Tuttle MR, et al. Invasion rather than nuclear features correlates with outcome in encapsulated follicular tumors: further evidence for the reclassification of the encapsulated papillary thyroid carcinoma follicular variant. Hum Pathol. 2015;46:657–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nikiforov YE, Seethala RR, Tallini G, et al. Nomenclature revision for encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. A paradigm shift to reduce overtreatment of indolent tumors. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:1023–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Miyauchi A. Clinical trials of active surveillance of papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid. World J Surg. 2016;40:516–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ito Y, Uruno T, Nakano K, et al. An observation trial without surgical treatment in patients with papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid. Thyroid. 2003;13:381–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Brito JP, Ito Y, Miyauchi A, et al. A clinical framework to facilitate risk stratification when considering an active surveillance alternative to immediate biopsy and surgery in papillary microcarcinoma. Thyroid. 2016;26:144–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Haser GC, Tuttle RM, Su HK, et al. Active surveillance for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: new challenges and opportunities for the health care system. Endocr Pract. 2016;22:602–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Takada N, Hirokawa M, Suzuki A, et al. Reappraisal of “cyst fluid only” on thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology. Endcr J. 2017;64:750–65.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kennichi Kakudo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  • Marc Pusztaszeri
    • 6
  • Massimo Bongiovanni
    • 7
  1. 1.Faculty of MedicineNara Hospital, Kindai UniversityIkomaJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical UniversityWakayamaJapan
  3. 3.Okamoto Thyroid ClinicOsakaJapan
  4. 4.Yamashita Thyroid HospitalFukuokaJapan
  5. 5.Faculty of Medicine, Shandong UniversityJinanJapan
  6. 6.Department of PathologyJewish General Hospital and McGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  7. 7.Service of Clinical Pathology, Institute of PathologyLausanne University HospitalLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations