Advertisement

The Evolution of Housing Rights Activism in South Korea

  • Seon Young Lee
Chapter
Part of the The Contemporary City book series (TCONTCI)

Abstract

This paper examines the evolution of housing rights movements in South Korea over the last four decades in terms of the evolution of the right to the city in a developmental state. The transformation of urban social movements (USMs) over housing in Korea can be divided into three waves. The movements, from the first wave through to the second wave, are mainly self-help movements and have various limitations that keep them from developing into a larger framework that can enact fundamental change. Tenants’ and owner-occupiers’ activism has made progress in developing strategies to address the adverse effects of market-driven urban redevelopment and housing development and has led to policy changes and new legislation. However, their activism has not seen the creation of new alternatives to existing society. In contrast, new movements have recently emerged in order to build an alternative urban redevelopment and housing development system and change the conventional concepts of housing and urban redevelopment. This new form of housing consumption and provision through housing cooperatives and new urban redevelopment methods could be one strategy which makes it possible to realise consumer control over housing on the basis of need rather than producers’ interests and speculator profiteering. These new attempts in the third wave are in their early stages, but they are valuable starting points that make it possible to think about what kind of the city we want to live in and how to reshape our cities by ourselves. These grass-roots movements potentially stand to create fundamentally different cities and change people’s day-to-day lives. This new grass-roots approach could be effective at tackling wider structural inequality which has resulted in unequal resource allocation for economic growth over the last half-century.

Keywords

Housing rights Developmental state Urban redevelopment South Korea 

References

  1. Castells, M. (1976). Theoretical Propositions for an Experimental Study of Urban Social Movements. In C. Pickvance (Ed.), Urban Sociology: Critical Essays. Kent: Tavistock Publication.Google Scholar
  2. Castells, M. (1983). The City and the Grassroots. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cho, O. R. (1989). Urban Poor’s Socio-Economic Characteristics and Community Movements. In H. K. Kim (Ed.), Slums and Urban Redevelopment. Seoul: Nanam (in Korean).Google Scholar
  4. Davis, L. K. (2011). International Events and Mass Evictions: A Longer View. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35, 582–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doling, J. (1999). Housing Policies and the Little Tigers: How Do They Compare with Other Industrialised Countries? Housing Studies, 14, 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fainstein, S. S. (2010). The Just City. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fainstein, S. S., & Fainstein, N. I. (1985). Economic Restructuring and the Rise of Urban Social Movements. Urban Affairs Review, 21, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ha, S.-K. (2002). The Urban Poor, Rental Accommodations, and Housing Policy in Korea. Cities, 19, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. He, S. (2012). Two Waves of Gentrification and Emerging Rights Issues in Guangzhou, China. Environment and Planning A, 44, 2817–2833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hwang, I. C., & Yoo, N. Y. (1989). Urban Poor’s Legal Status Related to Residence: Urban Redevelopment and Tenants’ Rights. In H. Kim (Ed.), Slums and Urban Redevelopment. Seoul: Nanam (in Korean).Google Scholar
  11. Jang, K. S. (2006). The Spatial Development of Developmental State: The Case of the Process of Residential Area Formation Along the Han Riversides During the 1960s and 1980s in Seoul, Korea. Space and Society: Journal of Korean Association of Spatial and Environment Research, 25, 194–212 (in Korean).Google Scholar
  12. Kim, D.-C. (2006a). Growth and Crisis of the Korean Citizens’ Movement. Korea Journal, (Summer), 99–128.Google Scholar
  13. Kim, H. H. (1998). South Korea: Experiences of Eviction in Seoul. In A. Azuela, E. Duhau, & E. Ortiz (Eds.), Evictions and the Right to Housing: Experience from Canada, Chile, The Dominican Republic, South Africa, and South Korea. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
  14. Kim, H.-R. (2003). Unraveling Civil Society in South Korea: Old Discourses and New Visions. In D. C. A. W. H. Schak (Ed.), Civil Society in Asia. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  15. Kim, J. (2010). Mobilizing Property-Based Interests: Politics of Policy-Driven Gentrification in Seoul, Korea. PhD, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  16. Kim, K. H., & Cho, M. (2010). Structural Changes, Housing Price Dynamics and Housing Affordability in Korea. Housing Studies, 25, 839–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim, S. H., Chun, H.-K., & Jang, J.-H. (1998). Eviction from the View of the Evicted. Seoul: Korea Centre for City and Environment Research.Google Scholar
  18. Kim, Y.-M. (2006b). Towards a Comprehensive Welfare State in South Korea: Institutional Features, New Socio-Economic and Political Pressures, and the Possibility of the Welfare State. London: Asia Research Centres.Google Scholar
  19. Kwon, S., & Holliday, I. (2007). The Korean Welfare State: A Paradox of Expansion in an Era of Globalisation and Economic Crisis. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16, 242–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leckie, S. (1992). From Housing Needs to Housing Rights: An Analysis of the Right to Adequate Housing Under International Human Rights Law. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
  21. Lee, H. K. (1999). Globalization and the Emerging Welfare State-the Experience of South Korea. International Journal of Social Welfare, 8, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, H. S. (2013a). Youth’s Housing Rights, Minsnail Union. Urbanity and Poverty, 102, 49–61.Google Scholar
  23. Lee, J. (2003). Is There an East Asian Housing Culture? Contrasting Housing Systems of Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea. The Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 2, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee, J. W. (2012). Building Community, Housing Regeneration by Social Enterprise: A Case Study of Toadhousing. LHI Archives, 9, 106–113.Google Scholar
  25. Lee, J. Y. (1990). The Practice of Protest: Three Case Studies in Urban Renewal in Seoul, Korea. PhD, City University of New York.Google Scholar
  26. Lee, J. Y. (2000). The Practice of Urban Renewal in Seoul, Korea: Mode, Governance, and Sustainability. The 2nd International Critical Geography Conference, Taegu, Korea (in Korean).Google Scholar
  27. Lee, S.-H. (2013b). Counterattack of Apartments. Seoul: KBS (in Korean).Google Scholar
  28. Lee, S. Y. (2014). New-Build Gentrification and Anti-Gentrification Movements in Seoul, South Korea. PhD, King’s College London.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, S. Y. (2016). Neil Smith, Gentrification and Korea. Space and Society: Journal of Korean Association of Spatial and Environment Research, 26, 209–234 (in Korean).Google Scholar
  30. Lim, S.-H. (1995). Housing Environment in the Era of Local Autonomy. Space and Society: Journal of Korean Association of Spatial and Environment Research, 6, 102–124 (in Korean).Google Scholar
  31. Lim, S.-H. (2005). Housing Policies Over Half of the Last Century. Seoul: Kimundang (in Korean).Google Scholar
  32. Mayer, M. (2006). Manuel Castells’ the City and the Grassroots’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30, 202–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McGovern, S. J. (1997). Cultural Hegemony as an Impediments to Urban Protest Movement: Grassroots Activism and Downtown Development in Washington, DC. Journal of Urban Affairs, 19, 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ng, M. K. (2002). Property-Led Urban Renewal in Hong Kong: Any Place for the Community? Sustainable Development, 10, 140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Park, Y.-N. (1988). Housing Policy and the Urban Social Movement. Regional Study: Journal of Korean Regional Science Association, 4, 59–71 (in Korean).Google Scholar
  36. Park, I. K., & Lee, S. Y. (2012). Analyzing Changes in Space and Movements for Opposition and Alternatives in Seoul. Space and Society: Journal of Korean Association of Spatial and Environment Research, 22, 5–50 (in Korean).Google Scholar
  37. Pekkanen, R. (2004). After the Developmental State: Civil Society in Japan. Journal of East Asian Studies, 4, 363–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pickvance, C. (1985). The Rise and Fall of Urban Movements and the Role of Comparative Analysis. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 3, 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rabrenovic, G. (2008). Urban Social Movements. In J. S. Davies & D. L. Imbroscio (Eds.), Theories of Urban Politics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Ronald, R., & Jin, M.-Y. (2010). Homeownership in South Korea: Examining Sector Underdevelopment. Urban Studies, 47, 2367–2388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shao, Q. (2013). Shanghai Gone: Domicide and Defiance in a Chinese Megacity. New York and Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Shin, H. B. (2008). Driven to Swim with the Tide? Urban Redevelopment and Community Participation in China (CASE Discussion Paper Series). London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  43. Shin, H. B. (2009). Life in the Shadow of Mega-Events: Beijing Summer Olympia and Its Impact on Housing. Geoforum, 40, 906–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shin, H. B. (2013). The Right to the City and Critical Reflections on China’s Property Rights Activism. Antipode, 45, 1167–1189.Google Scholar
  45. Shin, J. S. (2010). The ‘Housing Class’ Differenciation of Urban (Re)development in South Korea—Based on a Case Study of G ‘New Town’ Project and Home Owner’s Movement in Northern Seoul. Master, Yonsei University (in Korean).Google Scholar
  46. Shin, J.-W. (2011). The Uniqueness of Korean Residential Capitalism in International Comparison. Trend and Perspective, 81, 112–155 (in Korean).Google Scholar
  47. Smart, A., & Lam, K. (2009). Urban Conflicts and the Policy Learning Process in Hong Kong: Urban Conflict and Policy Change in the 1950s and After 1997. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 2, 190–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tarrow, S. G. (2011). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weinstein, L., & Ren, X. (2009). The Changing Right to the City: Urban Renewal and Housing Rights in Globalizing Shanghai and Mumbai. City & Community, 8, 407–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Woo, M. S. (2004). Explaining Early Welfare Policies in South Korea: Focusing on the Nexus Between the State and the Business Sector. Development and Society, 33, 185–206.Google Scholar
  51. Wu, F. (2004). Residential Relocation Under Market-Oriented Redevelopment: The Process and Outcomes in Urban China. Geoforum, 35, 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yoon, I.-S. (1994). Housing in a Newly Industrialized Economy: The Case of South Korea. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seon Young Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Independent ResearcherSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations