Advertisement

‘We Are Quality Citizens of Bangkok Too’: Urban Activism in Bangkok During the 2011 Floods

  • Danny Marks
Chapter
Part of the The Contemporary City book series (TCONTCI)

Abstract

The 2011 floods exposed vast inequalities in Bangkok in terms of those who were exposed and those who were protected. Reflecting Bangkok’s socioeconomic and political inequalities, communities in the peri-urban fringes, particularly slum communities, were inundated the most and the longest, whereas the inner city of Bangkok, the home of the central business district and many of the elite and the city’s industrial estates were protected by the national government. During the floods, many communities challenged this protection of the elite and have demanded more equal redistribution of floodwater and compensation if they are flooded. In 2011, 85 flood-related protests occurred in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region (BMR), most of them over the location and height of temporary sandbags walls, the operation of water gates and compensation schemes after the floods subsided. By looking at protests against the state’s responses to the flooding as a form of urban activism and as a claim to the right to the city, this paper considers a rarely discussed form of urban activism in the literature. After summarizing the activism that arose during the floods and reasons behind them, the paper focuses on two case studies of activist communities in Bangkok which two heavily protested against the uneven shape of the flood during 2011. It concludes by discussing the degree of the success of this collective action during the floods in claiming the right to the city in 2011.

Keywords

Urban protests 2011 bangkok floods Community-based activism Right to the city Inequality 

References

  1. AFP. (2011, November 27). Thai Minister Facing No Confidence Vote Over Flood.Google Scholar
  2. Bangkok Metropolitan Administration. (2012). Statistical Profile of Bangkok Metropolitan Administration 2011. Bangkok: Bangkok Metropolitan Administration.Google Scholar
  3. Bangkok Post. (2011a, November 12). Govt Apologises to Flood Victims.Google Scholar
  4. Bangkok Post. (2011b, November 14). Don Muang Bags Protest Grows.Google Scholar
  5. Bangkok Post. (2011c, November 16). Big Bag Barrier Breached Again.Google Scholar
  6. Bangkok Post. (2011d, December 12). Don Muang Should Be Dry in 3–5 Days. http://www.bangkokpost.com/archive/don-muang-should-be-dry-in-3-5-days/270336.
  7. Bangkok Pundit. (2011). Suan Dusit Polls Show Declining Confidence in Thai PM, Govt. http://asiancorrespondent.com/2011/11/suan-dusit-polls-show-declining-confidence-in-pm-and-the-thai-government/.
  8. Collins, T. W. (2010). Marginalization, Facilitation, and the Production of Unequal Risk: The 2006 Paso Del Norte Floods. Antipode, 42(2), 258–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dikec, M. (2009). Justice and the Spatial Imagination. In P. Marcuse, J. Connolly, J. Novy, I. Olivo, C. Potter, & J. Steil (Eds.), Searching for the Just City: Debates in Urban Theory and Practice (pp. 72–88). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Douglass, M. (2014). After the Revolution: From Insurgencies to Social Projects to Recover the Public City in East and Southeast Asia. International Development Planning Review, 36(1), 15–32.  https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2014.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Economist Intelligence Unit. (2011). Floods Present a Serious Test of Yingluck’s Leadership.Google Scholar
  12. Elinoff, E. (2012). Smouldering Aspirations: Burning Buildings and the Politics of Belonging in Contemporary Isan. South East Asia Research, 20(3), 381–398.  https://doi.org/10.5367/sear.2012.0111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elinoff, E. (2013). Architectures of Citizenship:  Democracy, Development, and the Politics of Participation in Northeastern Thailand’s Railway Communities. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6x1444bm.
  14. Frederickson, T. (2011, November). Flood Management Controversy. Bangkok Post.Google Scholar
  15. Harvey, D. (1973). Social Justice and the City. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  16. Harvey, D. (2009). The Right to the Just City. In P. Marcuse, J. Connolly, J. Novy, I. Olivo, C. Potter, & J. Steil (Eds.), Searching for the Just City: Debates in Urban Theory and Practice (pp. 40–51). Abingdon, Oxon and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Hewison, K. (2014). Thailand: The Lessons of Protest. Journal of Critical Perspectives on Asia, 50(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  18. Hewison, K. (2015). Thailand: Contestation Over Elections. Sovereignty and Representation, 51(1), 51–62.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2015.1011459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holston, J. (2009). Insurgent Citizenship in an Era of Global Urban Peripheries. City & Society, 21(2), 245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jain, H. (2010). Community Protests in South Africa: Trends, Analysis and Explanations (Local Government Working Paper Series No. 1). University of Western Cape. Community Law Centre. http://mlgi.org.za/publications/publications-by-theme/local-government-in-south-africa/community-protests/Final%20Report%20-%20Community%20Protests%20in%20South%20Africa.pdf.
  21. Keil, R. (2003). Urban Political Ecology1. Urban Geography, 24(8), 723–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krungthep Turakij. (2011, November 17). Chao Lum Luk Ka Ruu Nao Gan Nam Tuam Khet Sai Mai [Lam Luk Ka People Removes the Water Barrier. Floods in Sai Mai District].Google Scholar
  23. Lefebvre, H. (1993). Architecture Culture: 1943–1968 (J. Ockman, Ed.). New York: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
  24. Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on Cities (E. Kofman & E. Lebas, Eds. and trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. MacCallum, D., Steele, W., Byrne, J., Houston, D., & Others. (2011, November). Environmental Imaginaries: Climate Change as an Object of Urban Governance. State of Australian Cities, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  26. Marcuse, P. (2012). Whose Right(s) to What City? In N. Brenner, P. Marcuse, & M. Mayer (Eds.), Cities for People, Not for Profit: Criticual Urban Theory and the Right to the City (pp. 24–41). Abingdon, Oxon  and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Marks, D. (2015). The Urban Political Ecology of the 2011 Floods in Bangkok: The Creation of Uneven Vulnerabilities. Pacific Affairs, 88(3), 623–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marks, D., & Lebel, L. (2016, March). Disaster Governance and the Scalar Politics of Incomplete Decentralization: Fragmented and Contested Responses to the 2011 Floods in Central Thailand [Decentralizing Disaster Governance Special Issue]. Habitat International, 52, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McCargo, D. (2010). Thailand’s Twin Fires. Survival, 52(4), 5–12.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2010.506815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Murray, M. J. (2009). Fire and Ice: Unnatural Disasters and the Disposable Urban Poor in Post-Apartheid Johannesburg. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(1), 165–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ngamsaithong, N. (2012, January 9). DSI Finds Corruption in Flood-Relief Bag Procurement. Thai Financial Post. http://thaifinancialpost.com/2012/01/09/dsi-finds-corruption-in-flood-relief-bag-procurement/.
  32. Ortmann, S. (2015). The Umbrella Movement and Hong Kong’s Protracted Democratization Process. Asian Affairs, 46(1), 32–50.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2014.994957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pelling, M., & Dill, K. (2009, May). Disaster Politics: Tipping Points for Change in the Adaptation of Sociopolitical Regimes. Progress in Human Geography.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509105004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Petty, M., & Szep, J. (2011, October 28). Insight: Thai Flood Crisis Puts Swamped PM in Firing Line. Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-thailand-floods-insight-idUSTRE79R0NK20111028.
  35. Roth, D., & Warner, J. (2007). Flood Risk, Uncertainty and Changing River Protection Policy in the Netherlands: The Case of ‘Calamity Polders’. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 98(4), 519–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sheppard, E., Gidwani, V., Goldman, M., Leitner, H., Roy, A., & Maringanti, A. (2015). Introduction: Urban Revolutions in the Age of Global Urbanism. Urban Studies, 52(11), 1947–1961.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015590050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sökefeld, M. (2012). The Attabad Landslide and the Politics of Disaster in Gojal, Gilgit-Baltistan. In U. Luig (Ed.), Negotiating Disasters: Politics, Representations, Meanings (pp. 175–204). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
  39. The Nation. (2011, November 25). Bang Khae Residents Block Expressway. http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/Bang-Khae-residents-block-expressway-30170601.html.
  40. Vorng, S. (2012). Incendiary Central: The Spatial Politics of the May 2010 Street Demonstrations in Bangkok (MMG Working Paper 12–04). Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Göttingen. Google Scholar
  41. Wake, D. (2011, November 27). Misery Lingers for Bangkok’s ‘Forgotten’ Flood Victims. Agence France-Presse. http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/global-filipino/world/11/27/11/misery-lingers-bangkoks-forgotten-flood-victims.
  42. Walker, D. M. (2013). Resisting the Neoliberalization of Space in Mexico City. Locating Right to the City in the Global South, 43, 171–194.Google Scholar
  43. Wong, N. W. M. (2016). Environmental Protests and NIMBY Activism: Local Politics and Waste Management in Beijing and Guangzhou. China Information, 30(2), 143–164.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X16641550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Asian and International StudiesCity University of Hong KongKowloon TongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations