Advertisement

Application: Terrorism Risk Assessment Using BFRI

  • Shangzhu Jin
  • Qiang Shen
  • Jun Peng
Chapter

Abstract

Terrorism and particularly suicide terrorist campaigns have became a high priority for governments, the media, and the general public. It is imperative to have a comprehensive security risk management programme including effective risk assessment and appropriate decision support for such activities. Terrorism risk assessment (TRA) therefore plays a crucial role in national and international security. In order to predict terrorist behaviour from a given set of evidence (including hypothesised scenarios), it is often necessary for investigators to reconstruct the possible scenarios that may have taken place.

References

  1. 1.
    B.C. Ezell, S.P. Bennett, D. Von Winterfeldt, J. Sokolowski, A.J. Collins, Probabilistic risk analysis and terrorism risk. Risk Anal. 30(4), 575–589 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.L. Darby, Evaluation of Risk from Acts of Terrorism: The Adversary/defender Model using Belief and Fuzzy Sets (United States, Department of Energy, 2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    U. Inyaem, P. Meesad, C. Haruechaiyasak, D. Tran, Terrorism event classification using fuzzy inference systems (IJCSIS). Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Secur. 7(3) (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.B. Bowles, C.Enrique Peláez, Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 50(2), 203–213 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.B. Bowles, Peláez, C. Enrique, Linguistic Evaluation of Terrorist Scenarios: Example Application, SAND2007-1301 (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    X. Fu, Q. Shen, Fuzzy compositional modeling. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 18(4), 823–840 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Q. Shen, J. Keppens, C. Aitken, B. Schafer, M. Lee, A scenario-driven decision support system for serious crime investigation. Law Probab. Risk 5(2), 87–117 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W.L. Waugh, International Terrorism: How Nations Respond to Terrorists (Documentary Publications Salisbury, NC, 1982)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Alcala, M.J. Gacto, F. Herrera, A fast and scalable multiobjective genetic fuzzy system for linguistic fuzzy modeling in high-dimensional regression problems. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 19(4), 666–681 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Mostafa, S. Mukhopadhyay, M. Palakal, W. Lam, A multilevel approach to intelligent information filtering: model, system, and evaluation. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. (TOIS) 15(4), 368–399 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    U. Kaymak , R. Babuska, Compatible cluster merging for fuzzy modeling, in Proceedings of the FUZZ-IEEE/IFES95 (1995), pp. 897–904Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Song, R. Marks, S. Oh, P. Arabshahi, T. Caudell, J. Choi, et al., Adaptive membership function fusion and annihilation in fuzzy if-then rules, in Second IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (IEEE, 1993), pp. 961–967Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Sun, Rule-base structure identification in an adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 2(1), 64–73 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. John Garrick, J.E. Hall, M. Kilger, J.C. McDonald, T. O’Toole, P.S. Probst, E. Rindskopf Parker, R. Rosenthal, A.W. Trivelpiece, L.A. Van Arsdale, et al., Confronting the risks of terrorism: making the right decisions. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 86(2), 129–176 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Sugeno, G. Kang, Fuzzy modeling and control of multilayer incinerator. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 18, 329–346 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Sugeno, I. Hirano, S. Nakamura, S. Kotsu, Development of an intelligent unmanned helicopter, in Proceedings of International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 5 (IEEE, 1995), pp. 33–34Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Sugeno, G. Kang, Structure identification of fuzzy model. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 28(1), 15–33 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    L.T. Kóczy, K. Hirota, L. Muresan, Interpolation in hierarchical fuzzy rule bases, in Proceedings of International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (2000), pp. 471–477Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    L.T. Kóczy, K. Hirota, L. Muresan, Backward fuzzy rule interpolation. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22(6), 1682–1698 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Z. Huang, Q. Shen, Fuzzy interpolative reasoning via scale and move transformations. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 14(2), 340–359 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Z. Huang, Q. Shen, Fuzzy interpolation and extrapolation: a practical approach. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 16(1), 13–28 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. Jin, R. Diao, C. Quek, Q. Shen, Backward fuzzy rule interpolation with multiple missing values, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (2013), pp. 1–8Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    S. Jin, R. Diao, C. Quek, Q. Shen, Backward fuzzy interpolation and extrapolation with multiple multi-antecedent rules, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (2012), pp. 1170–1177Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. Atran, Genesis of suicide terrorism. Science 299(5612), 1534–1539 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    R.A. Pape, The strategic logic of suicide terrorism. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 97(3), 343–361 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    W.L. Perry, C. Berrebi, R.A. Brown, J. Hollywood, A. Jaycocks, P. Roshan, T. Sullivan, L. Miyashiro, Predicting Suicide Attacks: Integrating Spatial, Temporal and Social Features of Terrorist Attack Targets (RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    R. Caruso, E. Gavrilova, Youth unemployment, terrorism and political violence, evidence from the israeli/palestinian conflict. Peace Econ. Peace Sci. Publ. Policy 18(2) (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    E.B. De Mesquita, The quality of terror. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 49(3), 515–530 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    D. Fromkin, The strategy of terrorism. Foreign Aff. 53(4), 683–698 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    A.B. Krueger, J. Maleckova, Education, poverty and terrorism: is there a causal connection. J. Econ. Perspect. 17(4), 119–144 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    G. LaFree, L. Dugan, Introducing the global terrorism database. Terror. Polit. Violence 19(2), 181–204 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    M.A. Sutton, O. Oenema, J.W. Erisman, A. Leip, H. van Grinsven, W. Winiwarter, Too much of a good thing. Nature 472(7342), 159–161 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    B.P. Bryant, R.J. Lempert, Thinking inside the box: a participatory, computer-assisted approach to scenario discovery. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 77(1), 34–49 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    V.A. Epanechnikov, Non-parametric estimation of a multivariate probability density. Theory Probab. Appl. 14(1), 153–158 (1969)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    K. H, B.F. Walter, The strategies of terrorism. Int. Secur. 31(1), 49–80 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    L. Huddy, S. Feldman, C. Taber, G. Lahav, Threat, anxiety, and support of antiterrorism policies. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 49(3), 593–608 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    E. Bueno de Mesquita, E.S. Dickson, The propaganda of the deed: Terrorism, counterterrorismand mobilization. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 51(2), 364–381 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    K. Gaibulloev, T. Sandler, Hostage taking: determinants of terrorist logistical and negotiation success. J. Peace Res. 46(6), 739–756 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    M. Hughes, Terror and negotiation. Terror. Polit. Violence 2(1), 72–825 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    V.A. Kremenyuk, G.-O. Faure, International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues (Jossey-Bass San Francisco, California, 2002)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    E. Pronin, K. Kennedy, S. Butsch, Bombing versus negotiating: how preferences for combating terrorism are affected by perceived terrorist rationality. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 28(4), 385–392 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    D.G. Pruitt, Negotiation with terrorists. Int. Negot. 11(2), 371–394 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    B.I. Spector, Negotiating with villains revisited: research note. Int. Negot. 8(3), 613–621 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    I.W. Zartman, Negotiating with terrorists. Int. Negot. 8(3), 443–450 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    N.A. Bapat, State bargaining with transnational terrorist groups. Int. Stud. Q. 50(1), 213–230 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    T. Sandler et al., Terrorism & game theory. Simul. Gaming 34(3), 319–337 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    T. Boongoen, Q. Shen, C. Price, Disclosing false identity through hybrid link analysis. Artif. Intell. Law 18(1), 77–102 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    T. Boongoen, Q. Shen, Nearest-neighbor guided evaluation of data reliability and its applications. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 40(6), 1622–1633 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    X. Fu, T. Boongoen, Q. Shen, Evidence directed generation of plausible crime scenarios with identity resolution. Appl. Artif. Intell. 24(4), 253–276 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    R.J. Brym, B. Araj, Are suicide bombers suicidal? Stud. Confl. Terror. 35(6), 432–443 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    A. Merari, I. Diamant, A. Bibi, Y. Broshi, G. Zakin, Personality characteristics of self martyrs/suicide bombers and organizers of suicide attacks. Terror. Polit. Violence 22(1), 87–101 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    L. Miller, The terrorist mind II. typologies, psychopathologies, and practical guidelines for investigation. Int. J. Offender Ther. Comp. Criminol. 50(3), 255–268 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    A. Lankford, Could suicide terrorists actually be suicidal? Stud. Confl. Terror. 34(4), 337–366 (2011)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    H.V. Savitch, An anatomy of urban terror: lessons from jerusalem and elsewhere. Urb. Stud. 42(3), 361–395 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    H.A. Hagras, A hierarchical type-2 fuzzy logic control architecture for autonomous mobile robots. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 12(4), 524–539 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Z.-Q. Liu, R. Satur, Contextual fuzzy cognitive map for decision support in geographic information systems. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 7(5), 495–507 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    R. Diao, Q. Shen, Feature selection with harmony search. IEEE Trans. B Syst. Man Cybern. 42(6), 1509–1523 (2012)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    R. Diao, Q. Shen, New approaches to fuzzy-rough feature selection. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 17(4), 824–838 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Electrical and Information EngineeringChongqing University of Science and TechnologyChongqingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Computer ScienceAberystwyth UniversityAberystwythUK

Personalised recommendations