Theoretical Estimation of the Microalgal Potential for Biofuel Production and Carbon Dioxide Sequestration in India

  • Bunushree Behera
  • Nazimdhine Aly
  • M. Asok Rajkumar
  • P. BalasubramanianEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 816)


The unprecedented decline in petroleum reserves along with the rising concerns of global warming and environmental pollution has resulted in the search for alternative energy. India receives an abundant amount of solar insolation that can be easily transformed into other bioenergy sources. In current years, microalgal biofuels have gained attention owing to the presence of substantial amount of lipids and ease of cultivation in the presence of light energy, wastewater, and carbon dioxide (CO2). In spite of the theoretical knowledge, the lack of convincing technical data and economic hindrances limit their field-scale application. The current study utilizes the global horizontal solar irradiance data (from the year 2002 to 2008) of India as input into the photon energy balance equations, which were solved in MATLAB to predict the theoretical microalgal biomass, lipid productivity, and CO2 sequestration potential. The maximum biomass productivity was predicted as 90.1 g m−2 d−1, corresponding to the lipid productivity of 31.3 ml m−2 d−1 and CO2 sequestration potential of 23.6 g m−2 d−1 in the southern peninsular regions and Western Ghats. Since the solar irradiance varies from 3.25  to 6.08 kWh m−2 d−1 for the entire Indian subcontinent, most parts of India were projected to be suitable for growing microalgae. Decline in biomass productivity by 32.5% was evident accounting for photoinhibition effects such preliminary estimates would help in assessing the real-time potential of microalgae before going for cost-intensive field-scale analysis.


Microalgae Solar insolation Photoinhibition Biomass productivity Lipid productivity CO2 sequestration 



The authors are thankful to the Department of Biotechnology and Medical Engineering, NIT Rourkela, for providing the necessary facilities to carry out this research work. The authors greatly acknowledge the Ministry of Human Resources Development, Government of India, for sponsoring the Ph.D. program of the first author.


  1. 1.
    Aly, N., Balasubramanian, P.: Effect of geographical coordinates on carbon dioxide sequestration potential by microalgae. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 8(2), 147–152 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aly, N., Balasubramanian, P.: Effect of photoinhibition on microalgal growth in open ponds of NIT Rourkela, India. J. Biochem. Technol. 6(3), 1034–1039 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aly, N., Tarai, R.K., Kale, P.G., Paramasivan, B.: Modelling the effect of photoinhibition on microalgal production potential in fixed and trackable photobioreactors in Odisha, India. Curr. Sci. 113(2), 272–283 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asmare, A.M., Demessie, B.A., Murthy, G.S.: Theoretical estimation the potential of algal biomass for biofuel production and carbon sequestration in Ethiopia. Int. J. Renew Energy Res. 3(3), 560–570 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chisti, Y.: Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol. Adv. 25(3), 294–306 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    González, J.A., Calbó, J.: Modelled and measured ratio of PAR to global radiation under cloudless skies. Agric. For. Meteorol. 110(4), 319–325 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huesemann, M., Crowe, B., Waller, P., Chavis, A., Hobbs, S., Edmundson, S., Wigmosta, M.: A validated model to predict microalgae growth in outdoor pond cultures subjected to fluctuating light intensities and water temperatures. Algal Res. 13, 195–206 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kandpal, T.C., Broman, L.: Renewable energy education: a global status review. Renew and Sust. Energ. Rev. 34, 300–324 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maity, J.P., Bundschuh, J., Chen, C.Y., Bhattacharya, P.: Microalgae for third generation biofuel production, mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and wastewater treatment: present and future perspectives—A mini review. Energy 78, 104–113 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Milano, J., Ong, H.C., Masjuki, H.H., Chong, W.T., Lam, M.K., Loh, P.K., Vellayan, V.: Microalgae biofuels as an alternative to fossil fuel for power generation. Renew Sustain. Energy Rev. 58, 180–197 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rangabhashiyam, S., Behera, B., Aly, N., Balasubramanian, P.: Biodiesel from microalgae as a promising strategy for renewable bioenergy production—A review. J Environ. Biotechnol. Res. 6(4), 260–269 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Slegers, P.M., Lösing, M.B., Wijffels, R.H., Van Straten, G., Van Boxtel, A.J.B.: Scenario evaluation of open pond microalgae production. Algal Res. 2(4), 358–368 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Slegers, P.M., Wijffels, R.H., Van Straten, G., Van Boxtel, A.J.B.: Design scenarios for flat panel photobioreactors. Appl. Energy 88(10), 3342–3353 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sudhakar, K., Premalatha, M., Rajesh, M.: Large-scale open pond algae biomass yield analysis in India: a case study. Int. J. Sustain. Energy 33(2), 304–315 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sudhakar, K., Premalatha, M.: Theoretical assessment of algal biomass potential for carbon mitigation and biofuel production. Iranica J. Energy Environ. 3(3), 232–240 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sudhakar, K., Rajesh, M., Premalatha, M.: A mathematical model to assess the potential of algal bio-fuels in India. Energy Sour. A: Recovery Util. Environ. Effects 34(12), 1114–1120 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Torzillo, G., Pushparaj, B., Masojidek, J., Vonshak, A.: Biological constraints in algal biotechnology. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 8(6), 338–348 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weyer, K.M., Bush, D.R., Darzins, A., Willson, B.D.: Theoretical maximum algal oil production. Bioenerg Res. 3(2), 204–213 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhou, Y., Schideman, L., Yu, G., Zhang, Y.: A synergistic combination of algal wastewater treatment and hydrothermal biofuel production maximized by nutrient and carbon recycling. Energy Environ. Sci. 6(12), 3765–3779 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bunushree Behera
    • 1
  • Nazimdhine Aly
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Asok Rajkumar
    • 3
  • P. Balasubramanian
    • 1
  1. 1.Agricultural & Environmental Biotechnology Group, Department of Biotechnology & Medical EngineeringNational Institute of Technology RourkelaRourkelaIndia
  2. 2.Groupe-SMTPAntananarivoMadagascar
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringGnanamani College of TechnologyNamakkalIndia

Personalised recommendations