Advertisement

Comparison of Carbon Hotspots of India and China: An Analysis of Upstream and Downstream Supply Chains

  • Priyanka Tariyal
Chapter
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

The present study enables the analysis of carbon hotspots responsible for CO2 emissions in India and China. The hotspot approach indicates the contribution of the various sectors to direct emissions of CO2 and carbon footprints with a focus only on single pollutant, CO2. The direct emissions considered in this study refer to the CO2 emissions generated by a sector to meet its own final demand and demand from all other sectors of the economy, while footprints pertain to the total volume of CO2 emissions embodied in the upstream supply chain of a sector (Katris 2015). Using the direct and embodied CO2 emissions, a hotspot is identified as a point on a sector’s supply chain (either upstream or downstream) that represents emissions above some standard level. The analysis uses the World Input–Output Database (Timmer et al. 2015) for data on India and China. For the purpose of analysis, only initial and final years, i.e. 1995 and 2009 of this database, have been considered. However, the study further extends the hotspot analysis of Indian economy for the year 2011 by using OECD Intercountry Input–Output Database (OECD 2015). The analysis allows us to identify the sectors that deserve more consideration for mitigation for the success of CO2 emission reduction strategy.

Keywords

CO2 emissions Input–output analysis Carbon footprint Direct emissions 

JEL Code

E1 O11 O25 P5 Q4 R11 

References

  1. Acquaye, A. A., Wiedmann, T., Feng, K., Crawford, R. H., Barett, J., Kuylenstierna, J., et al. (2011). Identification of ‘carbon hot-spots’ and quantification of GHG intensities in the biodiesel supply chain using hybrid LCA and structural path analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(8), 2471–2478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. C2ES. (2015). India climate and energy policies. Centre for Climate and Energy Policies. Retrieved from January 4, 2018 from https://archive.nyu.edu/jspui/bitstream/2451/40701/2/india%27s%20climate%20and%20energy%20policies.pdf.
  3. Court, C., Munday, M., Roberts, A., & Turner, K. (2015). Can hazard waste supply chain ‘hotspots’ be identified using an input–output framework? European Journal of Operational Research, 241, 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Genty, A., Arto, I., & Neuwahl, F. (2012). Final database of environmental satellite accounts: Technical report on their compilation. WIOD. http://www.wiod.org/publications/source_docs/Environmental_Sources.pdf.
  5. Katris, A. (2015). Identifying and analysing carbon ‘hot-spots’ in an inter-regional input output framework (Unpublished thesis Ph.D.). University of Sterling, Sterling, U.K. Retrieved December 8, 2016 from file:///C:/Users/hp1/Downloads/Antonios%20Katris%20PhD%20thesis%20final%20submission%20(21).pdf.Google Scholar
  6. Kitzes, J. (2013). An introduction to environmentally extended input output analysis. Resources, 2(4), 489–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leontief, W. (1936). Quantitative input and output relations in the economic system of the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics, 18, 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Machado, G., Schaeffer, R., & Worrell, E. (2001). Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil: An input–output approach. Ecological Economics, 39(3), 409–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Miller, R. W., & Blair, P. D. (2009). Input-output analysis-foundations and extensions (2nd Ed.) U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Minx, J., Wiedmann, T., Wood, R., Peters, G. P., Lenzen, M., & Owen, A. (2009). Input-output analysis and carbon foot printing: An overview of applications. Economic Systems Research, 21(3), 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. OECD, (2015). OECD Inter-Country Input-Output (ICIO) tables. [online] Available at: http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/inputoutputtablesedition2015accesstodata.html.
  12. Okamoto, N. (2005). Agglomeration, intraregional and interregional linkages in China. In: N. Okamoto & T. Ihara (Eds.). Spatial structure and regional development in China: An interregional input-output approach (pp. 128–153). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Timmer, M. P., Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., Stehrer, R., & de Vries, G. J. (2015). An illustrated user guide to the world input-output database: The case of global automotive production. Review of International Economics, 23, 575–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Turner, K., Munday, M., McGregor, P., & Swales, K. (2012). How responsible is a region for its carbon emissions? An empirical general equilibrium analysis. Ecological Economics, 76, 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wiedmann, T. (2009). Editorial: Carbon footprint and input-output analysis—An introduction. Economic System, 21, 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Human Rights Commission (NHRC)New DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Kurukshetra UniversityKurukshetraIndia

Personalised recommendations