Advertisement

Intermediate Input Technological Progress Translated into Neoclassical Terms—A Study with Reference to the Indian Economy

  • Partha Pratim Ghosh
Chapter
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

While the demand-driven Leontief system leads to a reduction in total output when there is increased efficiency of intermediate inputs, in the neoclassical system technological progress must lead to higher output. This paper presents an explanation of technical progress that resolves the apparent paradox using India’s Input–Output table for 2011–12. The idea of technological improvements has been taken from two current programs of development, namely Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY) and Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) that would lead to increased efficiency of irrigation and water resource usage and increased efficiency of road connectivity across the country in a multi-sector framework. This paper calculates elasticity of final demands with respect to intermediate inputs, as also price effects arising out of changes in Input–Output coefficients. Results indicate that in order to enhance efficiency of intermediate inputs used in the agricultural sectors, it is necessary to adopt similar efficiency augmenting programs in other sectors of the economy as well. This will lead to a balanced increase in productivity of all sectors and affect agriculture more favorably.

Keywords

Input–Output Agriculture Efficiency of intermediate inputs Technological improvement 

JEL Classification

C67 D57 Q16 O5 O33 

References

  1. CSO Supply-Use Tables. (2011–12, 2012–13). www.mospic.nic.
  2. Dietzenbacher, E. (1997). In vindication of the Ghosh model: a reinterpretation as a price model. Journal of regional science, 37(4), 629–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Duchin, F., & Lange, G.-M. (1995). The choice of technology and associated changes in prices in the U.S. Economy. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 6, 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare (2017) Operational guidelines of per drop more crop (micro irrigation) component of PMKSY. www.pmksy.gov.in/MicroIrrigation/Archive/GuidelinesMIRevised260417.pdf.
  5. Miller, R., & Blair, P. (2009). Input output analysis: Foundations and extensions. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India, and International Labor Organization. (2015). Impact Assessment Study of Improved Road Maintenance System under PMGSY. pmgsy.nic.in/Impact_Asmt_RRM.pdf.
  7. Niti Aayog Annual Report. (2014–15). Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY) and Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY). Government of India. http://niti.gov.in/.
  8. Research Report IDC-7, ICRISAT Development Centre, PMO Strategy Document Series. (2016). Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana: Enhancing impact through demand driven innovations. http://idc.icrisat.org.
  9. Sonis, M., & Hewings, G. (1989). Error and sensitivity input-output analysis: A new approach. In R. E. Miller, K. R. Polenske, & A. Z. Rose (Eds.), Frontiers of input-output analysis (pp. 232–244). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Sonis, M., & Hewings, G. (1992). Coefficient change in input-output models: Theory and applications. Economic Systems Research, 4, 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sonis, M., & Hewings, G. (1999). Miyazawa’s contributions to understanding economic structure: Interpretation, evaluation and extensions. In G. J. D. Hewings, M. Sonis, M. Madden, & Y. Kimura (Eds.), Understanding and interpreting economic structure (pp. 13–51). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Xavier’s College (Autonomous)KolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations