Challenges in Construction of Regional Accounts in India

  • P. Bhanumati
  • Kakali Mukhopadhyay
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)


India is a land of diversity. The disparity among the states in the country, attributable to historical difference in initial conditions, natural resource endowments, level of industrialization and differences in human capital indicators, viz. education, health, etc., not only has manifested in varying levels of growth and development, but are also likely to affect the returns on investment. Regional supply–use frameworks are a tool for planners to help analyse the effect of varying levels of investment and optimizing the use of available resources. But the regional supply–use framework needs to be ‘regionalized’ properly by using local-level information, without which it may lead to wrong inferences. Two important roadblocks, which are faced by the compilers of regional supply–use tables in India, are the vectors on capital formation and trade. Estimates of capital formation at the regional level are not compiled at the regional level due to the absence of state-level data sources as are available at the national level. The national-level estimates are allocated to the states using appropriate indicators. As regards trade, there is a lack of reliable, comprehensive data on the quantity and value of products exported from a state to other Indian states or to other countries. This paper reviews the methods used so far in the available literature and attempts to give some suggestions in this regard, with the help of new/unconventional data sources for the period of 2012–13 to 2014–15 for eight major states of India.


  1. Bhalla, G. S., Chadha, G. K., Kashyap, S. P., & Sharma, R. K. (1990). Agricultural growth and structural changes in the Punjab economy: An input–output analysis. Research Report No. 82, CSRD, JNU, Delhi in collaboration with International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC.
  2. Deman, S. (1990). Comparison of regional structures of production: A study in development strategy. The Review of Regional Studies, 20(2).Google Scholar
  3. Dhawan, S., & Saxena, K. K. (1992). Limitations of Indian input–output tables. Journal of Income and Wealth, 14(2), 64–66.Google Scholar
  4. Dholakia, B. H., & Dhalokia, R. H. (1988a). Input–output tables for Kerala: Methodology and estimates. Working Papers, IIMA.Google Scholar
  5. Dholakia, B. H., & Dhalokia, R. H. (1988b). Inter-industry tables for Gujarat: Methodology and estimates. Quarterly Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 28(4), 1–16.Google Scholar
  6. Dholakia, R. H. (1992). Regionalizing a national input–output table. Journal of Income and Wealth, 14(2), 77–81.Google Scholar
  7. Dholakia, R. H., & Dholakia, B. H. (1992). Input–output tables for Rajasthan—Methodology and estimates. Journal of Income and Wealth, 14(2), 82–89.Google Scholar
  8. Directorate of Economics & Statistics, Delhi. (2013). Input–output table of Delhi for 2007-08, Publication.Google Scholar
  9. Eurostat. (2008). Manual of supply, use and input–output tables, manuals and guidelines.Google Scholar
  10. Eurostat. (2013). Manual on regional accounts methods, manuals and guidelines.Google Scholar
  11. Kolli, R. (2007). Compilation of national accounts statistics in India: A historical perspective. Journal of Income and Wealth, 29(1).Google Scholar
  12. Narain, P. (1992). Input–output transaction table at state level. Journal of Income and Wealth, 14(2), 49–52.Google Scholar
  13. Parasuram, Y. (1992). Input–output analysis and its relevance to planning. Journal of Income and Wealth, 14(2), 71–76.Google Scholar
  14. Rajeswari, T., Singh, R., & Singh, M. (2015). Estimation of all India and state level capital formation from NSS 67th round survey. Journal of Income and Wealth, 37(1), 50–61.Google Scholar
  15. Rajeswari, T., Sinharay, A., & Sahoo, H. (2009). Estimation of capital formation at state level. Journal of Income and Wealth, 31(1).Google Scholar
  16. Ramachandran, M. (1963). A structural analysis and linear programming within an input–output model emphasizing agriculture in India, Retrospective Theses and Dissertations, IOWA State University, Paper 2359.Google Scholar
  17. Sachs, J. D., Bajpai, N., & Ramiah, A. (2002). Understanding regional economic growth in India. Asian Economic Papers, 1(3), 32–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saluja, M. R., & Sharma, A. (1991). Economic structure of a least and most developed region of India: A comparative study in an input–output framework. Artha Vijnana, 33(2), 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Saluja, M. R., & Sharma, A. (1992). State input–output tables: Sources and methods. Journal of Income and Wealth, 14(2), 90–97.Google Scholar
  20. Sargento, A. L. M. (2009). Introducing input–output analysis at the regional level: Basic notions and specific issues. Discussion Papers, Regional Economics Applications Laboratory, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  21. Sengupta, A. (2014). Construction of regional input–output table in India using non-survey method: The case of West Bengal. Paper presented at 22nd IIOA, Portugal.Google Scholar
  22. Sharma, S. (2007). Indian contribution to Leontief’s input–output economics. Paper presented at sixteenth international input–output conference, Turkey.Google Scholar
  23. Sharma, S. P., & Saxena, K. K. (1992). Input–output table at regional level—Some conceptual issues. Journal of Income and Wealth, 14(2), 53–63.Google Scholar
  24. Singh, I., & Singh, L. (2011). Regional input–output table for the state of Punjab, Economics Department, Punjab University, Patiala, MPRA Paper posted on http://mpra.ub.uni-mueclen.ds/32344.
  25. Sinha, A., Prabhakar, A., & Jaiswal, A. (2015). Employment dimension of infrastructure investment—State level input–output analysis. Working Paper No. 168 on Employment, ILO.Google Scholar
  26. Swaminathan, A. M. (2008). Methods for generation of a regional input–output table for the state of Maharashtra: A comparative analysis, UDE, Dr. Vibhooti Shukla Unit in Urban Economics & Regional Development, Working Paper No. 29.Google Scholar
  27. Thakur, P. D., & Singh, S. P. (1992). Input–output transaction tables at state level with special reference to Punjab—An approach paper. Journal of Income and Wealth, 14(2), 67–70.Google Scholar
  28. Venkataramaiah, P., Kulkarni, A. R., & Argade, L. (1970). Regional input–output matrices, India, 1965. Arth Vijnana, 21(3–4), 273–670.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gokhale Institute of Politics & EconomicsPuneIndia
  2. 2.Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Agricultural Economics ProgramMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations