Advertisement

Promoting the Political Inclusion and Participation of Older People: Social, Psychological and Institutional Perspectives

  • Amílcar MoreiraEmail author
  • Mikkel Barslund
Chapter

Abstract

Building on an innovative analytical framework that acknowledges that political participation is influenced by individual, symbolic and institutional factors, Moreira and Barslund discuss a new set of insights on the factors that influence older people’s civic engagement, namely, the decrease in participation in later life does not signify a withdrawal from public life, but instead reflects the disengagement of employment-related organisations as individuals retire; print media plays a role in the (re)producing norms about how seniors should behave in society; perceived violations of these norms strengthen negative stereotypes of seniors; seniors are mostly involved at the decision-making level of policy-making, and mostly on a consultative basis—involvement in decisions concerning the implementation of services is rare.

References

  1. Abrams, D. (2010). Processes of Prejudices: Theory, Evidence and Intervention, Equalities and Human Rights Commission. Retrieved from http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/uploaded_files/research/56_processes_of_prejudice.pdf
  2. Abrams, D., Russell, P., Vauclair, M., & Swift, H. (2011). Ageism in Europe: Findings from the European Social Survey. Age UK. Retrieved from http://www.ageuk.org.uk/documents/en-gb/id10704%20ageism%20across%20europe%20chapter%20interactive.pdf
  3. Arnstein, S. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the Royal Town Planning Institute, 1(6), 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avritzer, L. (2006). New Public Spheres in Brazil: Local Democracy and Deliberative Politics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(6), 623–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barslund, M., & von Werder, M. (2016). Measuring Dependency Ratios Using National Transfer Accounts. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2016, 14, 155–185.Google Scholar
  6. Barslund, M., Almeida, S. V., & Principi, A. (2018). Measuring and Cross-Country Comparisons of Active Citizenship Among Different Generations in the EU. In Centre for European Policy Studies. Belgium: CEPS.Google Scholar
  7. Bhatti, Y., & Hansen, K. M. (2012). The Effect of Generation and Age on Turnout to the European Parliament: How Turnout Will Continue to Decline in the Future. Electoral Studies, 31(2), 262–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burr, J. A., Caro, F. G., & Moorhead, J. (2002). Productive Aging and Civic Participation. Journal of Aging Studies, 16, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell, A. L. (2002). Self-Interest, Social Security, and the Distinctive Participation Patterns of Senior Citizens. The American Political Science Review, 96(3), 565–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, A. L. (2003). Participatory Reactions to Policy Threats: Senior Citizens and the Defense of Social Security and Medicare. Political Behavior, 25(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carter, T., & Beresford, P. (2000). Age and Change: Models of Involvement for Older People. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  12. Coudin, G., & Alexopoulos, T. (2010). “Help me! I’m old!” How Negative Aging Stereotypes Create Dependency Among Older Adults. Aging and Mental Health, 14(5), 516–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607861003713182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crittenden, J. (1963). Aging and Political Participation. The Western Political Quarterly, 16(2), 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deaton, A. (1985). Panel Data from Time Series of Cross-Sections. Journal of Econometrics, 30(1), 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Erkulwater, J. L. (2012). Political Participation Over the Life Cycle. In K. L. Schlozman, S. Verba, & H. E. Brady (Eds.), The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy (pp. 199–231). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Eurostat. (2015). Population: Structure Indicators. Proportion of the Population Aged 65 Years or More. Retrieved March 20, 2018, from Eurostat: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do
  17. Falanga, R., Cebulla, A., Socci, M., & Moreira, A. (2018). The Participation of Senior Citizens in Policy Making: Developing a Taxonomy. University of Lisbon: Institute of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  18. Fiske, S., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goerres, A. (2009). The Political Participation of Older People in Europe: The Greying of Our Democracies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grasso, M. T. (2014). Age, Period and Cohort Analysis in a Comparative Context: Political Generations and Political Participation Repertoires in Western Europe. Electoral Studies, 33, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoskins, B., & Mascherini, M. (2009). Measuring Active Citizenship Through the Development of a Composite Indicator. Social Indicators Research, 90(3), 459–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levy, B. R. (2009). Stereotype Embodiment: A Psychosocial Approach to Aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 332–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lopes, R. C., Miranda, M. P., Swift, H. J., Abrams, D., & Moreira, A. (2018). The Impact of Perceived Threats on Attitudes Towards Senior Citizens: An Experimental Approach. University of Lisbon: Institute of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  24. Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L., & Stoker, G. (2001). Trends in Public Participation: Part 1 – Local Government Perspectives. Public Administration, 79(1), 205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marques, S., Lima, M., Abrams, D., & Swift, H. (2014). Will to Live in Older People’s Medical Decisions: Immediate and Delayed Effects of Aging Stereotypes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moreira, A., Manso, L., & Barslund, M. (2018). Active Citizenship over the Life-Cycle. A Pseudo-Panel Approach. University of Lisbon: Institute of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  27. Neundorf, A., & Niemi, R. G. (2014). Beyond Political Socialization: New Approaches to Age, Period, Cohort Analysis. Electoral Studies, 33(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nie, N. H., Verba, S., & Kim, J. (1974). Political Participation and the Life Cycle. Comparative Politics, 6(3), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. North, M., & Fiske, S. (2013a). Act Your (Old) Age: Prescriptive, Ageist Biases Over Succession. Consumption, and Identity, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(6), 720–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. North, M., & Fiske, S. T. (2013b). A Prescriptive, Intergenerational-Tension Ageism Scale: Succession, Identity, and Consumption (SIC). Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 706–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Older People’s Steering Group. (2004). Older People Shaping Policy and Practice. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  32. Principi, A., Balducc, F., Papa, R. M., & Barslund, M. (2018). Understanding the Relationship Between Informal Family Elder Caregiving and Active Citizenship of Older European People. The National Institute on Health and Ageing (INRCA – Istituto Nazionale di Riposo e Cura per Anziani).Google Scholar
  33. Quintelier, E. (2007). Differences in Political Participation Between Young and Old People. Contemporary Politics, 13(2), 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smets, K., & Neundorf, A. (2014). The Hierarchies of Age-Period- Cohort Research: Political Context and the Development of Generational Turnout Patterns. Electoral Studies, 33, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Swift, H., Abrams, D., & Marques, S. (2012). Threat or Boost: Social Comparison Affects Older People’s Performance Differently Depending on Task Domain. Journals of Gerontology, Series B, 68, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Swift, H., Abrams, D., Lamont, R., & Drury, L. (2017). The Risks of Ageism Model: How Ageism and Negative Attitudes Toward Age Can Be a Barrier to Active Aging. Social Issues And Policy Review, 11, 195–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.1203.
  37. Swift, H. J., Lopes, R. C., Carvalho, B., & Moreira, A. (2018). Putting Seniors in Their Place: Prescriptive Norms About Seniors in the Portuguese and UK Print Media. Kent: University of Kent.Google Scholar
  38. UNDP. (1993). Human Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Walker, A. (1999). Political Participation and Representation of Older People in Europe. In A. Walker & G. Naegele (Eds.), The Politics of Old Age in Europe (pp. 7–24). Buckingham: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Walker, A. (2006). Aging and Politics: An International Perspective. In R. Binstock & L. George (Eds.), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences (6th ed., pp. 339–359). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  41. Walker, A. (2018). The Future of Ageing in Europe. Making an Asset of Longevity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  42. Wass, H. (2007). The Effects of Age, Generation and Period on Turnout in Finland – 1975–2003. Electoral Studies, 26, 648–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Social SciencesUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Centre for European Policy StudiesBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations