Advertisement

Biosensing: A Critical Reflection on Doing Memory Research Through the Body

  • Tess OsborneEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Biosensors, as biologically inspired technologies that quantify bodily response, can be used to infer emotional response. Consequently, biosensing provides an opportunity to move beyond traditional enquiries and investigate experiences at the level of the body. It is well acknowledged that the processes of memory and emotion are deeply entwined at an embodied level. Indeed, memories are emotionally charged and able to stir physiological response. Reflecting upon a recent study using these technologies, this chapter discusses the use of biosensors in memory research by deliberating the ethical and practical considerations of their use. It is argued that the use of biosensors in memory research has the capacity to uncover new knowledges but not whole empirical truths.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Jessica Pykett, Phil Jones, and Peter Kraftl for their comments and feedback on this chapter. This work was funded as part of a grant from the Economic and Social Research Council ES/J50001X/1.

References

  1. Adams, D., & Larkham, P. (2015). Walking with the ghosts of the past: Unearthing the value of residents’ urban nostalgias. Urban Studies, 53(10), 2004–2022.Google Scholar
  2. Ash, J. (2017). Visceral methodologies, bodily style and the non-human. Geoforum, 82, 206–207.Google Scholar
  3. Aspinall, P., Mavros, P., Coyne, R., & Roe, J. (2013). The urban brain: Analysing outdoor physical activity with mobile EEG. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 49(4), 1–6.Google Scholar
  4. Bannerman, D. M., Rawlins, J. N. P., McHugh, S. B., Deacon, R. M. J., Yee, B. K., Bast, T., et al. (2004). Regional dissociations within the hippocampus—Memory and anxiety. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 28(3), 273–283.Google Scholar
  5. Bhatti, M., Church, A., Claremont, A., & Stenner, P. (2009). “I love being in the garden”: Enchanting encounters in everyday life. Social & Cultural Geography, 10(1), 61–76.Google Scholar
  6. Blunt, A. (2003). Collective memory and productive nostaglia: Anglo-Indian homemaking at McCluskieganj. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23, 717–738.Google Scholar
  7. Cahill, L., & Alkire, M. T. (2003). Epinephrine enhancement of human memory consolidation: Interaction with arousal at encoding. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 79(2), 194–198.Google Scholar
  8. Cahill, L., & McGaugh, J. L. (1998). Mechanisms of emotional arousal and lasting declarative memory. Trends in Neurosciences, 21(7), 294–299.Google Scholar
  9. Carlson, N. (2013). Physiology of behavior. Boston/London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  10. Choudhury, S., & Slaby, J. (2011). Critical neuroscience: A handbook of the social and cultural contexts of neuroscience. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Critchley, H. D., Eccles, J., & Garfinkel, S. N. (2013). Interaction between cognition, emotion, and the autonomic nervous system. Handbook of Clinical Neurology: Autonomic Nervous System, 117, 59–77.Google Scholar
  12. DeSilvey, C. (2012). Copper places: Affective circuitries. In O. Jones & J. Garde-Hansen (Eds.), Geography and memory: Explorations in identity, place and becoming (pp. 45–57). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Empatica. (2014). Empatica E4 technical specifications. Retrieved May 11, 2017, from http://box.empatica.com/documentation/20141119_E4_TechSpecs.pdf
  14. Erickson, K. I., Voss, M. W., Prakash, R. S., Basak, C., Szabo, A., Chaddock, L., et al. (2011). Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 3017–3022.Google Scholar
  15. Evans, J., & Jones, P. (2011). The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and place. Applied Geography, 31(2), 849–858.Google Scholar
  16. Everly Jr., G., & Rosenfield, R. (1981). The nature and treatment of the stress response: A practical guide for clinicians. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Gabella, G. (2001). Autonomic nervous system. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  18. Gallagher, S. (2006). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Garbarino, M., Lai, M., Bender, D., Picard, R. W., & Tognetti, S. (2014). Empatica E3 – A wearable wireless multi-sensor device for real-time computerized biofeedback and data acquisition. In 4th International Conference on Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare (pp. 39–42), Athens.Google Scholar
  20. Gold, I., & Stoljar, D. (1999). A neuron doctrine in the philosophy of neuroscience. Behavioural and Brain Science, 22(5), 809–830.Google Scholar
  21. Gravenhorst, F., Tessendorf, B., Muaremi, A., Kappeler-Setz, C., Arnrich, B., & Tröster, G. (2012). Mobile system for unobtrusive monitoring of Electrodermal activity in daily life. In 6th International Workshop on Ubiquitous Health and Wellness, Newcastle.Google Scholar
  22. Greenfield, S. (1997). The human brain: A guided tour. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
  23. Harris, P. (2017). Nostalgia and play. In W. Russell, H. Smith, & S. Lester (Eds.), Practice-based research in children’s play (pp. 19–34). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hayes-Conroy, A., & Martin, D. (2010). Mobilising bodies: Visceral identification in the slow food movement. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35, 269–281.Google Scholar
  25. Herz, S., & Schooler, J. W. (2002). A naturalistic study of autobiographical memories evoked by olfactory and visual cues: Testing the Proustian hypothesis. American Journal of Psychology, 115(1), 21–32.Google Scholar
  26. Hoelscher, S., & Alderman, D. H. (2004). Memory and place: Geographies of a critical relationship. Social & Cultural Geography, 5(3), 347–355.Google Scholar
  27. Jones, O. (2015). “Not promising a landfall …”: An autotopographical account of loss of place, memory and landscape. Environmental Humanities, 6(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
  28. Jones, O., & Garde-Hansen, J. (2012). Geography and memory: Explorations in identity, place and becoming. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Kreibig, S. D. (2010). Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A review. Biological Psychology, 84(3), 394–421.Google Scholar
  30. LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155–184.Google Scholar
  31. Longhurst, R., Ho, E., & Johnston, L. (2008). Using “the body” as an “instrument of research”: Kimch’i and pavlova. Area, 40(2), 208–217.Google Scholar
  32. Lupton, D. (2012). M-health and health promotion: The digital cyborg and surveillance society. Social Theory & Health, 10(3), 229–244.Google Scholar
  33. Maguire, E. A., Frackowiak, R. S., & Frith, C. D. (1997). Recalling routes around London: Activation of the right hippocampus in taxi drivers. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17(18), 7103–7110.Google Scholar
  34. Nafus, D. (2016). Quantified: Biosensing technologies in everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  35. Nold, C. (2009). Emotional cartography: Technologies of the self. http://emotionalcartography.net/EmotionalCartography.pdf. Accessed 13 Jun 2017.
  36. Nummenmaa, L., Glerean, E., Hari, R., & Hietanen, J. K. (2014). Bodily maps of emotions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(2), 646–651.Google Scholar
  37. Osborne, T., & Jones, P. (2017). Biosensing and geography: A mixed methods approach. Applied Geography, 87, 160–169.Google Scholar
  38. Peper, E., Harvey, R., Lin, I.-M., Tylova, H., & Moss, D. (2007). Is there more to blood volume pulse than heart rate variability, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, and cardiorespiratory synchrony? Biofeedback, 35(2), 54–61.Google Scholar
  39. Picard, R. W. (1997). Affective computing. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Resch, B., Summa, A., Sagl, G., Zeile, P., & Exner, J.-P. (2015). Urban emotions—Geo-semantic emotion extraction from technical sensors, human sensors and crowdsourced data. Progress in Location-Based Services, 2014, 199–212.Google Scholar
  41. Resch, B., Summa, A., Zeile, P., & Strube, M. (2016). Citizen-centric urban planning through extracting emotion information from twitter in an interdisciplinary space-time-linguistics algorithm. Urban Planning, 1(2), 114–127.Google Scholar
  42. Ruskamp, P. (2016). Your environment and you: Investigating stress triggers and characteristics of the built environment (Unpublished Masters Thesis). Kansas State University.Google Scholar
  43. Sexton, A. E., Hayes-Conroy, A., Sweet, E. L., Miele, M., & Ash, J. (2017). Better than text? Critical reflections on the practices of visceral methodologies in human geography. Geoforum, 82, 200–201.Google Scholar
  44. Shoval, N., Schvimer, Y., & Tamir, M. (2017). Real-time measurement of tourists’ objective and subjective emotions in time and space. Journal of Travel Research, 57(1), 3–16.Google Scholar
  45. Shoval, N., Schvimer, Y., & Tamir, M. (2018). Tracking technologies and urban analysis: Adding the emotional. Cities, 72(1240), 34–42.Google Scholar
  46. Spinney, J. (2015). Close encounters? Mobile methods, (post)phenomenology and affect. Cultural Geographies, 22(2), 231–246.Google Scholar
  47. Thrift, N. (2004). Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 86(1), 57–78.Google Scholar
  48. Thrift, N. (2011). Lifeworld Inc—And what to do about it. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29(1), 5–26.Google Scholar
  49. Zeile, P., Resch, B., Exner, J.-P., & Sagl, G. (2015). Urban emotions: Benefits and risks in using human sensory assessment for the extraction of contextual emotion information in urban planning. In S. Geertman, J. Ferreira, R. Goodspeed, & J. C. H. Stillwell (Eds.), Planning support systems and smart cities (pp. 209–225). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations