Advertisement

Community Memory Mapping as a Visual Ethnography of Post-War Northeast England

  • Sarah De Nardi
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter develops around a community mapping methodology and its fieldwork. Community-centred visualisations, growing out of emplaced stories and affects, may be able to channel otherwise elusive imaginaries and the ephemeral mnemonic spaces encountered in fieldwork. For Ricoeur, telling stories can give shape to ephemeral, intangible elements of everyday life. What of the intangible elements of everyday life and storytelling that are remembered collectively and individually, but do not necessarily leave a physical trace? This chapter engages with one such visualisation, a memory-map of the village of Kibblesworth in northeast England, populated with the present and past imaginings of a community of people and of an open-air museum. The museum embodies the imagination of place and of local/non-local memory construction, as it prepares to ‘reassemble’ and exhibit a terrace of prefabricated concrete houses removed from Kibblesworth in the new 1950s town.

References

  1. Agnew, J. (1987). Place and politics. Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. (2004). Talking whilst walking: An archaeological geography of knowledge. Area, 36(3), 254–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, G., Kearns, R., Kontos, P., & Wilson, V. (2006). Their finest hour: Older people, oral histories, and the historical geography of social life. Social & Cultural Geography, 7(2), 153–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson, D. (2007). Kitsch geographies and the everyday spaces of social memory. Environment and Planning A, 39, 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cappelletto, F. (2003). Long-term memory of extreme events: From autobiography to history. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9, 241–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crampton, J. (2001). Mapping: A critical introduction to cartography and GIS. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Crouch, D. (2015). Affect, heritage, feeling. In E. Waterton & S. Watson (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of contemporary heritage research (pp. 177–190). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Nardi, S. (2014). Senses of place, senses of the past: Making experiential maps as part of community heritage fieldwork. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage, 1(1), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Nardi, S. (2016). The poetics of conflict experience: Materiality and embodiment in second world war Italy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Nardi, S. (2019). Visualising place, memory and the imagined. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. DeLyser, D. (1999). Authenticity on the ground: Engaging the past in a California ghost town. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89(4), 602–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dicks, B. (2010). Heritage, place and community. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
  13. Drozdzewski, D. (2015). Retrospective reflexivity: The residual and subliminal repercussions of researching war. Emotion, Space and Society, 17, 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duffy, P. (2014). Grassroots archaeology: An experiment in monument resurrection and suburban identity in North Dublin. Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage, 1(3), 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harley, B. (1989). Deconstructing the map. Cartographica, 26(2), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kavanagh, G. (2000). Dream spaces. Memory and the museum. London: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Keith, M. (1992). Angry writing: (Re)presenting the unethical world of the ethnographer. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 10, 551–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kesby, M. (2007). Spatialising participatory approaches: The contribution of geography to a mature debate. Environment and Planning A, 39, 2813–2831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lowenthal, D. (1985). The past is a foreign country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Macdonald, S. (1997). A people’s story: Heritage, identity and authority. In C. Rojek & J. Urry (Eds.), Touring cultures: Transformations of travel and theory (pp. 155–175). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. MacKian, S. (2004). Mapping reflexive communities: Visualising the geographies of emotion. Social and Cultural Geography, 5(4), 615–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Margalit, A. (2002). The ethics of memory. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Muzaini, H. (2015). On the matter of forgetting and “memory returns”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40, 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pearce, S. (1992). Museums, objects, and collections: A cultural study. Leicester: Leicester University-Press.Google Scholar
  25. Pink, S. (2009). Doing sensory ethnography. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pink, S. (2013). Engaging the senses in ethnographic practice: Implications and advances. The Senses and Society, 8(3), 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ricoeur, P. (1991). In M. J. Valdés (Ed.), A Ricoeur reader. Reflection and imagination. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  28. Riley, M., & Harvey, D. (2005). Landscape archaeology, heritage and the community in Devon: An oral history approach. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 11(4), 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rizvi, U. Z. (2006). Accounting for multiple desires: Decolonizing methodologies, archaeology, and the public interest. India Review, 5(3), 394–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rouverol, A. J. (1999). “I was content and not content”: Oral history and the collaborative process. Oral History, 28(2), 66–78.Google Scholar
  31. Sather-Wagstaff, J. (2017). Making polysense of the world: Affect, memory, heritage. In D. Tolia-Kelly, E. Waterton, & S. Watson (Eds.), Heritage, affect and emotion: Politics, practices and infrastructures (pp. 12–30). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Schama, S. (2005). Landscape and memory. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  33. Sin, C. H. (2003). Interviewing in ‘place’: The socio-spatial construction of interview data. Area, 35, 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tuan, Y. (1974). Topophilia. A study of environmental perception. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Wainwright, M. (2012, May 7). Gateshead prefabs become part of history, online at https://www.theguardian.com/uk/the-northerner/2012/may/07/housing-heritage-prefabs-airey-gateshead In The Guardian. Accessed 28 Feb 2018.
  37. Waterton, E. (2005). Whose sense of place? Reconciling archaeological perspectives with community values: Cultural landscapes in England. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 11(4), 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Waterton, E. (2014). A more-than-representational understanding of heritage: The ‘past’ and the politics of affect. Geography Compass, 8(11), 823–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Watson, S., & Waterton, E. (2010). Reading the visual: Representation and narrative in the construction of heritage. Material Culture Review, 71, 84–97.Google Scholar
  40. Witcomb, A. (2013). Understanding the role of affect in producing a critical pedagogy for history museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 28(3), 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wood, D. (1992). The power of maps. New York: the Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  42. Wylie, J. (2002). An essay on ascending Glastonbury Tor. Geoforum, 33, 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zerubavel, E. (2003). Time maps: Collective memory and the social shape of the past. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah De Nardi
    • 1
  1. 1.Western Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations