Advertisement

Contradictions

  • Ilan Wiesel
Chapter
Part of the The Contemporary City book series (TCONTCI)

Abstract

This chapter concludes the book by offering several possible interpretations for the apparent contradiction of elite neighbourhoods: on the one hand, these neighbourhoods are a source of power contributing to the rise of elites in the so-called second gilded age of the twenty-first century; on the other hand, elites experience angst as they perceive their neighbourhood ‘paradise’ threatened by population growth, urban densification, traffic pressures, and increased cultural diversity. Finally, in this chapter I explore the implications of this study on elite suburbs for wider theoretical debates on social and spatial justice.

References

  1. Arthurson, K. (2012). Social mix and the city: Challenging the mixed communities consensus in housing and urban planning policies. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Baeten, G. (2001). Cliches of urban doom: The dystopian politics of metaphors for the unequal city – A view from Brussels. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(1), 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism”. Antipode, 34(3), 349–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler, T., & Lees, L. (2006). Super-gentrification in Barnsbury, London: Globalization and gentrifying global elites at the neighbourhood level. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31(4), 467–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Domain. (2015). Victorian house prices: How much has yours grown? https://www.domain.com.au/news/victorian-house-prices-how-much-has-yours-grown-20151211-gll03g/. Accessed 16 Feb 2018.
  7. Fincher, R., Iveson, K., Leitner, H., & Preston, V. (2014). Planning in the multicultural city: Celebrating diversity or reinforcing difference? Progress in Planning, 92, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hay, I., & Muller, S. (2014). Questioning generosity in the golden age of philanthropy: Towards critical geographies of super-philanthropy. Progress in Human Geography, 38(5), 635–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Higley, J., Deacon, D., & Smart, D. (1979). Elites in Australia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Jennings, J. (2007). Introduction. In J. Jennings (Ed.), Race, neighbourhoods, and the misuse of social capital (pp. 1–6). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kapoor, I. (2016). Billionaire philanthropy: ‘Decaf capitalism’. In I. Hay & J. Beaverstock (Eds.), Handbook on wealth and the super-rich (pp. 113–131). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Knowles, C., & Burrows, R. (2017). Reimagining Chinese London. In R. Burdett & S. Hall (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of the 21st century city (pp. 87–103). London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lees, L. (2003). Super-gentrification: The case of Brooklyn heights, New York City. Urban Studies, 40(12), 2487–2509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Murray, C. (1990). The emerging British underclass. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  17. Papayanis, M. A. (2000). Sex and the revanchist city: Zoning out pornography in New York. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18(3), 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pawson, H., Davison, G., & Wiesel, I. (2012). Addressing concentrations of disadvantage: Policy, practice and literature review. Melbourne: AHURI.Google Scholar
  19. Pawson, H., Hulse, K., & Cheshire, L. (2015). Addressing concentrations of disadvantage in urban Australia. Melbourne: AHURI.Google Scholar
  20. Pietsch, S. (2004). To have and to hold on to: Wealth, power and the capitalist class. In R. Kuhn (Ed.), Class and struggle in Australia (pp. 39–54). Sydney: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
  21. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Richardson, C., & Skott-Myhre, H. A. (2012). Habitus of the hood. Bristol: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  24. The Guardian. (2018, January 2018). Real estate rich list grows as Australia’s wealthiest reap property profits. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/jan/31/real-estate-rich-list-grows-as-australias-wealthiest-reap-property-profits. Accessed 16 Feb 2018.
  25. Van Eijk, G. (2010). Exclusionary policies are not just about the ‘neoliberal city’: A critique of theories of urban revanchism and the case of Rotterdam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4), 820–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Young, I. M. (2002). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilan Wiesel
    • 1
  1. 1.School of GeographyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations