• Ilan Wiesel
Part of the The Contemporary City book series (TCONTCI)


This chapter introduces the key political and theoretical debates with which this book engages. Global wealth is increasingly concentrated in the hands of elites, leading some to declare the emergence of a ‘second gilded age’. In urban studies, new questions are being asked about how the structures, dynamics, and everyday lives of cities and neighbourhoods contribute to such extreme inequality. In this chapter, I introduce the question of whether and how elite neighbourhoods might be conceived as sites where elites accumulate not only economic wealth, but also their powerful social and cultural capitals. Drawing on the literatures of social stratification and spatial justice, I present some of the key theoretical concepts that guide my analysis in the rest of the book. Finally, in this chapter, I also briefly introduce some relevant background information about Toorak, Mosman, and Cottesloe, and describe the methods used in my study of these three Australian suburbs.


  1. Aldrich, D. P. (2012). Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arthur, C. J., & Reuten, G. (1998). Marx’s Capital II, the circulation of capital: General introduction. In The circulation of capital (pp. 1–16). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, R. (2008). The flowing enclave and the misanthropy of networked affluence. In T. Blokland & M. Savage (Eds.), Networked urbanism: Social capital in the city (pp. 41–58). Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, R. (2016). Limited exposure: Social concealment, mobility and engagement with public space by the super-rich in London. Environment and Planning A, 48(7), 1302–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson, R., Borrows, R., Glucksberg, L., Ho, H. K., Knowles, C., & Rhodes, D. (2017). Minimum city? The deeper impacts of the ‘super-rich’ on urban life. In R. Forrest, S. Y. Koh, & B. Wissink (Eds.), Cities and the super-rich: Real estate, elite practices and urban political economies (pp. 253–272). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2011). Community profiles. Accessed 8 May 2017.
  7. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2016). 6523.0 Household income and wealth, Australia, 2013–14.
  8. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2017). 2016 Census QuickStats: Toorak. Accessed 24 July 2018.
  9. Australian Council of Social Services (ACOSS). (2015). Inequality in Australia: A nation divided. Accessed 15 Feb 2018.
  10. Australian Tax Office. (2015). Taxation statistics 2014–15, Table 6. Accessed 16 Feb 2018.
  11. Badcock, B. (1994). ‘Stressed out’ communities: ‘Out of sight, out of mind’? Urban Policy and Research, 12(3), 191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baxter, J., Emmison, M., & Western, J. (1991a). Introduction. In J. Baxter, M. Emmison, & J. Western (Eds.), Class analysis and contemporary Australia (pp. 2–13). Melbourne: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Baxter, J., Emmison, M., & Western, J. (1991b). Conclusion. In J. Baxter, M. Emmison, & J. Western (Eds.), Class analysis and contemporary Australia (pp. 339–346). Melbourne: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Beaverstock, J. V., Hubbard, P., & Short, J. R. (2004). Getting away with it? Exposing the geographies of the super-rich. Geoforum, 35(4), 401–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blokland, T., & Savage, M. (2008). Social capital and networked urbanism. In T. Blokland & M. Savage (Eds.), Networked urbanism: Social capital in the city (pp. 1–22). Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  16. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bridge, G. (2006). Perspectives on cultural capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 43(4), 719–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Butler, T. (2008). Social capital and the formation of London’s middle-classes. In T. Blokland & M. Savage (Eds.), Networked urbanism: Social capital in the city (pp. 217–236). Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  19. Campbell, E. (1963). The 60 rich families who own Australia. Sydney: Current Book Distributors.Google Scholar
  20. Connell, R. W. (1977). Ruling class, ruling culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Archive.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Connell, R., Ashenden, D., & Kessler, S. (1982). Making the difference: Schools, families and social division. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  22. Cornwell, B., & Doshkin, F. A. (2014). The power of integration: Affiliation and cohesion in a diverse elite network. Social Forces, 93(2), 803–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Credit Suisse. (2016). Global Wealth Report. Accessed 22 June 2017.
  24. Dahl, R. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Davis, M., & Monk, D. B. (Eds.). (2011). Evil paradises: Dreamworlds of neoliberalism. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  26. Davison, G., Legacy, C., Liu, E., & Darcy, M. (2016). The factors driving the escalation of community opposition to affordable housing development. Urban Policy and Research, 34(4), 386–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Devine-Wright, P., & Howes, Y. (2010). Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dodson, J., & Sipe, N. (2008). Shocking the suburbs: Urban location, homeownership and oil vulnerability in the Australian city. Housing Studies, 23(3), 377–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dogan, M. (2003). Introduction: Diversity of elite configurations and clusters of power. Comparative Sociology, 2(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Domain. (2017). Toorak: The suburb you move to to prove you’ve made the big time. Accessed 16 Feb 2018.
  31. Droseltis, O., & Vignoles, V. L. (2010). Towards an integrative model of place identification: Dimensionality and predictors of intrapersonal-level place preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Duncan, J. S., & Duncan, N. G. (2003). Landscapes of privilege: The politics of the aesthetic in suburban America. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Encel, S. (1970). Equality and authority: A study of class, status and power in Australia. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  34. Forrest, R., & Kearns, A. (2001). Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2125–2143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Forrest, R., Koh, S., & Wissink, B. (2017). Hyper-divided cities and the ‘immoral’ super-rich: Five parting questions. In R. Forrest, S. Y. Koh, & B. Wissink (Eds.), Cities and the super-rich: Real estate, elite practices and urban political economies (pp. 273–288). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Foster, D. (1999). A history of Toorak, east of Kooyong Road 1840–1998 (Doctoral dissertation). Monash University.Google Scholar
  37. Freeland, C. (2013). Plutocrats: The rise of the new global super-rich and the fall of everyone else. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  38. Galster, G. (2012). The mechanism (s) of neighbourhood effects: Theory, evidence, and policy implications. In M. Van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives (pp. 23–56). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gauntlett, D. (2011).Three approaches to social capital. Available at: Accessed 22 June 2017.
  40. Gibson, C. (2013). Welcome to Bogan-ville: Reframing class and place through humour. Journal of Australian Studies, 37(1), 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gilding, M. (2002). Secrets of the super rich. Pymble: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  42. Gleeson, B., & Randolph, B. (2002). Social disadvantage and planning in the Sydney context. Urban Policy and Research, 20(1), 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Grant, J., & Mittelsteadt, L. (2004). Types of gated communities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(6), 913–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  45. Hay, I. (2013). Geographies of the super-rich. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Higley, J., Deacon, D., & Smart, D. (1979). Elites in Australia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Hill, J., Jobling, R., Pollet, R., & Nettle, D. (2014). Social capital across urban neighborhoods: A comparison of self-report and observational data. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 8(2), 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Holmqvist, M. (2017). Leader communities: The consecration of elites in Djursholm. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Irvin, G. (2013). Super rich: The rise of inequality in Britain and the United States. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  50. Israel, E., & Frenkel, A. (2015). The distribution of capital forms between cities and suburbs and their impact on social justice in space. Urban Geography, 36(4), 578–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jennings, J. (2007a). Social capital, race and the future of inner-city neighbourhoods. In J. Jennings (Ed.), Race, neighbourhoods, and the misuse of social capital (pp. 87–108). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jennings, J. (2007b). Introduction. In J. Jennings (Ed.), Race, neighbourhoods, and the misuse of social capital (pp. 1–6). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Keister, L., & Southgate, D. (2012). Inequality: A contemporary approach to race, class, and gender. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Keller, S. I. (1963). Beyond the ruling class: Strategic elites in modern society. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  55. Lee, B. A., & Marlay, M. (2007). The right side of the tracks: Affluent neighborhoods in the metropolitan United States. Social Science Quarterly, 88(3), 766–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lewicka, M. (2005). Ways to make people active: The role of place attachment, cultural capital, and neighborhood ties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lindström, M., Merlo, J., & Östergren, P. O. (2003). Social capital and sense of insecurity in the neighbourhood: A population-based multilevel analysis in Malmö, Sweden. Social Science & Medicine, 56(5), 1111–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Low, S. (2004). Behind the gates: Life, security, and the pursuit of happiness in fortress America. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Marchant James, R. (2007). Cottesloe: A town of distinction. Perth: Town of Cottesloe.Google Scholar
  61. McGregor, C. (1997). Class in Australia: Who says Australia has no class system. Rignwood: Penguin.Google Scholar
  62. Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Murray, C. (1990). The emerging British underclass. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  64. Murray, G. (2006). Capitalist networks and social power in Australia and New Zealand. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
  65. Nitzan, J., & Bichler, S. (2009). Capital as power: A study of order and creorder. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. O’Lincoln, T. (1996). Wealth, ownership and power, the ruling class. In R. Kuhn & T. O’Lincoln (Eds.), Class and class conflict in Australia (pp. 5–21). Melbourne: Longmans.Google Scholar
  67. Ollivier, M. (2008). Revisiting distinction: Bourdieu without class? Journal of Cultural Economy, 1(3), 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Painter, J. (2000). Pierre Bourdieu. In M. Crang & N. Thrift (Eds.), Thinking space (pp. 239–259). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Pattison, C. (2013). Cottesloe’s child: Celebrating 100 years of education and growing up in north Cottesloe. Perth: North Cottesloe Primary School Parents and Citizens’ Association Incorporated.Google Scholar
  70. Pawson, H., & Herath, S. (2015). Dissecting and tracking socio-spatial disadvantage in urban Australia. Cities, 44, 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pietsch, S. (2004). To have and to hold on to: Wealth, power and the capitalist class. In R. Kuhn (Ed.), Class and struggle in Australia (pp. 39–54). Sydney: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
  72. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pow, C. P. (2011). Living it up: Super-rich enclave and transnational elite urbanism in Singapore. Geoforum, 42(3), 382–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Prince, R. S., & Schiff, L. (2008). The middle-class millionaire: The rise of the new rich and how they are changing America. New York: Broadway Business.Google Scholar
  76. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Quadagno, J. (2007). Who are the deciders now? The legacy of C. Wright Mills. Contemporary Sociology, 36(5), 422–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Randolph, B., & Tice, A. (2017). Relocating disadvantage in five Australian cities: Socio-spatial polarisation under neo-liberalism. Urban Policy and Research, 35(2), 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Real Estate Australia. (2016a). Melbourne’s most expensive suburbs revealed. Accessed 8 May 2017.
  80. Real Estate Australia. (2016b). Western Australia’s most expensive suburbs revealed. Accessed 8 May 2017.
  81. Real Estate Australia. (2016c). Accessed 8 May 2017.
  82. Richardson, C., & Skott-Myhre, H. A. (2012). Habitus of the hood. Bristol: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
  83. Savage, M. (2011). The lost urban sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. In The new Blackwell companion to the city (pp. 511–520). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  84. Savage, M. (2018). The elite habitus in cities of accumulation. In S. Hall & R. Burdett (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of the 21st century city. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  85. Sheill, C., & Stilwell, F. (2016). The wealth of the nation: Current data on the distribution of wealth in Australia. Sydney: Evatt Foundation.Google Scholar
  86. Short, J. R. (2013). Economic wealth and political power in the second Gilded Age. In Geographies of the super-rich (pp. 26–42). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Souter, G. G. (1993). Mosman: A history. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Stanley, T. J., & Danko, W. D. (1996). The millionaire next door: The surprising secrets of America’s wealthy. Atlanta: Longstreet Press.Google Scholar
  89. Van Ham, M., Manley, D., Bailey, N., Simpson, L., & Maclennan, D. (2012). Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  90. Vinson, T. (2009). The origins, meaning, definition and economic implications of the concept of social inclusion/exclusion. Canberra: Australian Government.Google Scholar
  91. Walby, S., Armstrong, J., & Strid, S. (2012). Intersectionality: Multiple inequalities in social theory. Sociology, 46(2), 224–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Webber, R., & Burrows, R. (2016). Life in an alpha territory: Discontinuity and conflict in an elite London ‘village’. Urban Studies, 53(15), 3139–3154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Weber, M. (1958). Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University press.Google Scholar
  94. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  95. Winters, J. A., & Page, B. I. (2009). Oligarchy in the United States? Perspectives on Politics, 7, 731–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Ziersch, A., Baum, F., MacDougall, C., & Putland, C. (2005). Neighbourhood life and social capital: The implications for health. Social Science & Medicine, 60(1), 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Zweigenhaft, R. L., & Domhoff, G. W. (2006). Diversity in the power elite: How it happened, why it matters. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilan Wiesel
    • 1
  1. 1.School of GeographyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations