Development of a Municipal Waste Management System from Environmental and Economic Evaluation Perspectives: A Best Available System Methodology
Designing an adequate municipal solid waste (MSW) system has proven a complex task in recent years due to the unpredictable combination of increased waste categories and new technological developments. Finding the optimal system for selecting such a suitable combination for a certain technology is a persisting issue. Hence, the development of a quantitative and applicable evaluation methodology is urgent. This paper develops an MSW management system, namely, Best Available System (BAS) methodology, which provides analysis from both environmental load and economic evaluation perspectives. Generally, it provides assessments from Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Costing (LCC) viewpoints and aims to propose the approach of a best available system. This study develops the BAS methodology concept, offers an optimal methodology of waste management evaluation system, builds databases, and applies the proposed methodology in a certain Japanese municipality.
KeywordsWaste management Life cycle assessment Life cycle costing Best available system (BAS) Municipal solid waste (MSW) Incineration Melting
We sincerely thank the corporations of Osaka Science & Technology Center waste treatment technology LCA work shop and its members. We also would like to express our gratitude to Ministry of the Environment, who provide grants-in-aid for scientific research expenses.
- 1.Onoda H. Life cycle assessment of incineration ash recycling and treatment methods. J Waste Manag Assoc. 2010;63:43–434. Available in Japanese.Google Scholar
- 2.Onoda H. Recycling society from LCA view, The 23rd National Congress for Environmental Studies Conference paper: 47–52, Available in Japanese. 2009.Google Scholar
- 3.Tabata T, Li Y, Hishinuma T. Study on effectiveness of simplified LCA using statistical data: about MSW incineration facilities. J Jpn Waste Manag. 2011;64(303):509–19. Available in Japanese.Google Scholar
- 5.Nakatani J, Aramaki T, Hanaki K. Integrated assessment based on cost-benefit analysis considering the preferences for multi-aspect impacts. J Environ Sci. 2007;20(6):435–48. Available in Japanese.Google Scholar
- 6.Amano K, Sowa T. Study on comprehensive evaluation of municipal solid waste disposal systems focused on combination of intermediate processing. J Jpn Soc Civil Eng G. 2007;63(4):391–402. Available in Japanese.Google Scholar
- 7.Matsuto T. Analysis, plan and evaluation of urban waste treatment system: material flow and LCA plan program. Tokyo: Gihodo Shuppan; 2005. Available in Japanese.Google Scholar
- 8.Nagata K, Nohtomi M, Sekiai H, Okachi T, Ohashi Y, Osada M. Study on the environment load assessment techniques for the effective use of water resources. Soc Mech Eng. 2003;3:406–9.Google Scholar
- 9.ISO 14040. Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. ISO 14040:2006. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2006.Google Scholar
- 11.Shimizu H, Nagata K. Integrated life cycle assessment (LCA) approach for printing service by using environmental load point (ELP) method. Soc Print Sci Technol. 2010;47:177–85.Google Scholar
- 12.Hu H, Onoda H, Nagata K. Life cycle assessment of municipal waste management processes based on real data. J Waste Manag Assoc. 2011;64:83–9. Available in Japanese.Google Scholar
- 13.New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization. Introduction of waste power generation manual (edited version), p. 300; 2002.Google Scholar