Advertisement

Energy System Design Incorporating Socio-Technical Regimes and Sustainability in Japan: Energy Use, Knowledge, and Choice in a Liberalizing Energy Market

  • Andrew John ChapmanEmail author
  • Nugroho Agung Pambudi
Chapter

Abstract

This research explores energy system design—assessing probable and desirable energy scenarios based on user choice and future system participation preferences as identified in a recent survey across Japan. Scenarios are assessed from a sustainability viewpoint to clarify their economic, environmental, and social effectiveness in a quantitative manner. Conclusions identify that user choices about the energy mix and participation in the energy market can impact energy system and sustainability outcomes significantly. Further, scenario evaluations identify that sustainability and policy effectiveness are not necessarily mutually exclusive. However, technological decisions require redress in order that the future energy system can deliver desirable properties such as low cost and environmentally sound energy in an inclusive manner while contributing to Japan’s energy policy goals such as an 80% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions target for 2050. Incorporating household level stakeholder engagement under the auspices of user choice and participation has significant, positive ramifications for the future energy system, particularly for technology innovation and future deployment. An early understanding of energy system influencing trends, as explored in this research, will serve as an enabler for policy energy system design for governments and energy system policymakers.

Keywords

System design Transition Participation Energy Policy Sustainability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

A part of this study was supported by the Kyushu University Platform of Inter/Transdisciplinary Energy Research (Q-PIT).

References

  1. 1.
    International Energy Agency. Energy policies of IEA Countries: JAPAN. 2016 Review. Paris: IEA Publications; 2016.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. Strategic energy plan. 2014.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. Long-term energy supply and demand outlook. 2015.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chapman AJ, Itaoka K. Energy transition to a future low-carbon energy society in Japan’s liberalizing electricity market: precedents, policies and factors of successful transition. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2018;81:2019–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Geels F, Kern F, Fuchs G, Hinderer N, Kungl G, Mylan J, Neukirch M, Wasserman S. The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990-2014). Res Policy. 2016;45:896–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geels F. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy. 2002;31(8–9):1257–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McLellan B, Chapman A, Aoki K. Geography, urbanization and lock-in—considerations for sustainable transitions to decentralized energy systems. J Clean Prod. 2016;128:77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pambudi N, Itaoka K, Chapman A, Kurosawa A, Kato E. Switch-off impact of nuclear power plant operation in the emission produced in Japan using times-Japan Framework. Proceedings of the International Conference on technology, engineering and social sciences; 2017 May. 2017.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chapman A, McLellan B, Tezuka T. Proposing an evaluation framework for energy policy making incorporating equity: applications in Australia. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2016;21:54–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yoon J, Bladick R, Novoselac A. Demand response for residential buildings based on dynamic price of electricity. Energ Buildings. 2014;80:53–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Statistical Handbook of Japan. Chapter 2: Population—Households. Chapter 11: Energy and Water—Fuel Consumption for Residential and Commercial Industry Use. Chapter 22: Monthly Receipts and Disbursements per Household by Type of Household and Number of Household Members—Fuel, Light and Water Charges. 2016.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    The Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan. Electricity review Japan. Tokyo. 2016.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    National Pollutant Inventory. Emissions estimation technique manual for fossil fuel electric power generation. Canberra. 2012.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bloomberg New Energy Finance Database. Country profiles: Japan—Capacity and generation. 2016.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    International Renewable Energy Agency. Levelised costs of electricity 2010–2016. 2016. http://resourceirena.irena.org/gateway/dashboard/.
  16. 16.
    Institute of Energy Economics Japan. Overview of assessment by power generation cost verification working group https://eneken.ieej.or.jp/data/6362.pdf.
  17. 17.
    Institute of Energy Economics Japan. Economic and energy outlook of Japan through FY2017. 2016. https://eneken.ieej.or.jp/data/6852.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Institute for Carbon Neutral Energy ResearchKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering EducationUniversitas Negeri Sebelas MaretKota SurakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations