Implementation of Trichoderma spp. for Conservation of Soil Health

  • Manish Kumar
  • Shabbir Ashraf
  • Rizwan Ali Ansari
  • Mohd Zuhaib
  • Arshi Jamil
  • Naresh Dhakar
  • Rafeeq Kasim
  • Amber Rizvi


Applications of extensive use of fungicides for the protection of crops from diseases have serious consequences on the environment and consumers. Disease suppression, through biocontrol agents (BCAs), is outcome interaction among the plants, pathogens and the microbial community. Soil microbes are capable of influencing the productivity, composition and diversity of plant communities directly or indirectly. Trichoderma spp. have potential to keep safe plants from pathogen populations under distinct soil conditions. Trichoderma spp. produce biologically active compounds, antibiotics, hydrolytic enzymes including cell wall-degrading enzymes and secondary metabolites which act against pathogen and promote growth of plants. It also releases metabolites helping resistance against biotic stress. BCAs Trichoderma spp. have been studied broadly and commercially marketed as biofertilizers, biopesticides and soil amendments. In the rhizosphere region, Trichoderma spp. act against soilborne pathogens and have potential to conserve soil health by replacing harmful chemicals in the near future.


  1. Adams PB (1990) The potential of mycoparasites for biological control of plant diseases. Annu Rev Phytopathol 28:59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams P, De-Leij FAAM, Lynch JM (2007) Trichoderma harzianum Rifai 1295–22 mediates growth promotion of crack willow (Salix fragilis) saplings in both clean and metal-contaminated soil. Microb Ecol 54:306–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahuja DB, Usha R, Singh RV, Meenakshi M, Sharma P, Bambawale OM (2012) Development of farmer-led integrated management of major pests of cauliflower cultivated in rainy season inIndia. J Agric Sci 4(2):79–90Google Scholar
  4. Amin F, Razdan VK, Mohiddin FA, Bhat KA, Banday S (2010) Potential of trichoderma species as biocontrol agents of soil borne fungal propagules. J Phytology 2(10):38–41Google Scholar
  5. Balaji LP, Ahir RR (2011) Evaluation of plant extracts and biocontrol agents against leaf spot disease of brinjal. Indian Phytopath 64(4):378–380Google Scholar
  6. Barea JM, Azcon R, Azcon-Aguilar C (2002) Mycorrhizosphere interactions to improve plant fitness and soil quality. Anton Leeuw Int J G 81:343–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brussaard L, de Ruiter PC, Brown GG (2007) Soil biodiversity for agricultural sustainability. AgrEcosyst Environ 121:233–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cao L, Jiang M, Zeng Z, Du A, Tan H, Liu Y (2008) Trichoderma atroviride F6 improves phytoextraction efficiency of mustard Brassica juncea (L.) Coss. var. foliosa Bailey in Cd, Ni contaminated soils. Chemosphere 71:1769–1773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chadha N, Mishra M, Prasad R, Varma A (2014) Root endophytic fungi: research update. J Biol Life Sci USA 5(2):135–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chet I (1987) Trichoderma-application, mode of action, and potential as a biocontrol agent of soilborne pathogenic fungi. In: Chet I (ed) Innovative approaches to plant disease control. Wiley, New York, pp 137–160Google Scholar
  11. Chet I, Baker R (1981) From soil naturally suppressive to Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology 71:286–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chet I, Inbar J (1994) Biological control of fungal pathogens. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 48(1):37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Contreras-Cornejo HA, Macias-Rodriguez L, Cortes-Penagos C, Lopez-Bucio J (2009) Trichoderma virens, a plant beneficial fungus, enhances biomass production and promotes lateral root growth through an auxin-dependent mechanism in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 149:1579–1592.
  14. Corley DG, Miller-Wideman M, Durley RC (1994) Isolation and structure of harzianum : a new richothecene from Trichoderma harzianum. J Natl Prod 57:422–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dubey SC, Patel B (2001) Evaluation of fungal antagonists against Thanatephorus cucumeris causing web blight of urd and mung bean.Indian. Phytopathology 54(2):206–209Google Scholar
  16. Dubey SC, Suresh M, Singh B (2007) Evaluation of Trichoderma species against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris for integrated management of chickpea wilt. Biol Control 40(1):118–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elad Y, Chet I (1995) Practical approaches for biocontrol agent implementation. In: Rauveni R (ed) Novel approaches to integrated pest management. Lewis, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 323–328Google Scholar
  18. Emani C, Garcıa JM, Lopata-Finch E, Pozo MJ, Uribe P, Kim DJ, Sunilkumar G, Cook DR, Kenerley CM, Rathore KS (2003) Enhanced fungal resistance in transgenic cotton expressing an endochitinase gene from Trichoderma virens. Plant Biotechnol J 1:321–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Errasquin EL, Vazquez C (2003) Tolerance and uptake of heavy metals by Trichoderma atroviride isolated from sludge. Chemosphere 50:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ezzi IM, Lynch JM (2005) Biodegradation of cyanide by Trichoderma spp. and Fusarium spp. Enzym Microb Technol 36:849–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fitzsimons MS, Miller RM (2010) The importance of soil microorganisms for maintaining diverse plant communities in tallgrass Prairie. Am J Bot 97:1937–1943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fravel DR, Rhodes DJ, Larkin RP (1999) Production and commercialization of biocontrol products. In: Integrated pest and disease management in greenhouse crops. Springer Dordrecht, pp 365–376Google Scholar
  23. Garbeva P, van Veen JA, van Elsas JD (2004) Microbial diversity in soil: selection microbial populations by plant and soil type and implications for disease suppressiveness. Annu Rev Phytopathol 42:243–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gaur RB, Sharma RN, Singh V (2005) Manipulations in the mycoparasite application techniques against Rhizoctonia root rot of cotton. Indian Phytopath 58(4):402–409Google Scholar
  25. Hajieghrari B (2010) Effect of some metal-containing compounds and fertilizers on mycoparasite Trichoderma species mycelia growth response. Afr J Biotechnol 9:4025–4033Google Scholar
  26. Haran S, Schikler H, Chet I (1996) Molecular mechanisms of lytic enzymes involved in the biocontrol activity of Trichoderma harzianum. Microbiology 142:2321–2331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harman GE, Kubicek CP (1998) Trichoderma and Gliocladium. Volume 2: Enzymes, biological control and commercial applications. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Harman GE, Lorito M, Lynch JM (2004) Uses of Trichoderma spp. to remediate soil and water pollution. Adv Appl Microbiol 56:313–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hatvani L, Manczinger L, Kredics L, Szekeres A, Antal Z, Vagvolgyi C (2006) Production of Trichoderma strains with pesticide polyresistance by mutagenesis and protoplast fusion. Anton Leeuw 89:387–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoitink HAJ, Madden LV, Dorrance AE (2006) Systemic resistance induced by Trichoderma spp.: interactions between the host, the pathogen, the biocontrol agent, and soil organic matter quality. Phytopathology 96:186–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Horvath EM, Burgel JL, Messner K (1995) The production of soluble antifungal metabolites by the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum in connection with the formation of conidiospores. Mater Org 29:1–4Google Scholar
  32. Jadon KS (2009) Eco-friendly management of brinjal collar rot caused by Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. Indian Phytopath 62(3):345–347Google Scholar
  33. Janvier C, Villeneuve F, Alabouvette C, Edel-Hermann V, Mateille T, Steinberg C (2007) Soil health through soil disease suppression: which strategy from descriptors to indicators? Soil Biol Biochem 39:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jatala P (1986) Biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 24:452–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kalita P, Bora LC, Bhagabati KN (1996) Phylloplane microflora of citrus and their role in management of citrus canker. Indian Phytopath 49(3):234–237Google Scholar
  36. Kapoor AS (2008) Biocontrol potential of Trichoderma spp. against important soilborne diseases of vegetable crops. Indian Phytopath 61(4):492–498Google Scholar
  37. Katayama A, Matsumura F (1993) Degradation of organochlorine pesticides, particularly endosulfan, by Trichoderma harzianum. Environ Toxicol Chem 12:1059–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Krause MS, Madden LV, Hoitink HAJ (2001) Effect of potting mix microbial carrying capacity on biological control of Rhizoctonia damping-off of radish and Rhizoctonia crown and root rot of poinsettia. Phytopathology 91:1116–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kumar S, Mukerji KG, Lai R (1996) Molecular aspects of pesticide degradation by microorganisms. Crit Rev Microbiol 22(1):1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kumar V, Parkhi V, Kenerley CM, Rathore KS (2009) Defense related gene expression and enzyme activities in transgenic cotton plants expressing an endochitinase gene from Trichoderma virens in response to interaction with Rhizoctonia solani. Planta 230:277–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lau JA, Lennon JT (2011) Evolutionary ecology of plant–microbe interactions: soil microbial structure alters selection on plant traits. New Phytol 192:215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leandro LFS, Guzman T, Ferguson LM, Fernandez GE, Louws FJ (2007) Population dynamics of Trichoderma in fumigated and compost amended soil and on strawberry roots. Appl Soil Ecol 35:237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lewis JA, Papavizas GC (1987) Application of Trichoderma and Gliocladium in alginate pellets for control of Rhizoctonia damping-off. Plant Pathol 36(4):438–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lorito M, Woo SL, Garcia I, Colucci G, Harman GE, Pintor-Toro JA, Filippone E, Muccifora S, Lawrence CB (1998) Genes from mycoparasitic fungi as a source for improving plant resistance to fungal pathogens. Proc Natl AcadSci USA 95:7860–7865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lorito M, Woo SL, Harman GE, Monte E (2010) Translational research on Trichoderma: from ‘Omics to the field. Annu Rev Phytopathol l48:395–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mendes R, Kruijt M, de Bruijn I, Dekkers E, van der Voort M, Schneider JHM, Piceno YM, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL, Bakker PAHM, Raaijmakers JM (2011) Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria. Science 332:1097–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mishra DS, Gupta AK, Prajapati CR, Singh US (2011) Combination of fungal and bacterial antagonists for management of root and stem rot disease of soybean. Pak J Bot 43(5):2569–2574Google Scholar
  48. Mukherjee PK, Haware MP, Raghu K (1997) Induction and evaluation of benomyl-tolerant mutants of Trichoderma viride for biological control of Botrytis grey mould of chickpea. Indian Phytopath 50(4):485–489Google Scholar
  49. Mukhopadhyay ASN, Mukherjee PK (1998) Biological control of plant diseases: status in India in biological suppression of plant diseases: phytopathogens, nematodes and weeds. Eds. Singh SP, Husain SS 7: 1–20Google Scholar
  50. Nannipieri P, Ascher J, Ceccherini MT, Landi L, Pietramellara G, Renella G (2003) Microbial diversity and soil functions. Eur J Soil Sci 54:655–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nelson EB (1990) Exudate molecules initiating fungal responses to seed seeds and roots. Plant Soil 129:61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pal KK, McSpadden Gardener B (2006) Biological control of plant pathogens. Plant Health Instr:1–25Google Scholar
  53. Pandey G, Pandey RK, Pant H (2003) Efficacy of different levels of Trichoderma viride against root-knot nematode in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Ann Pnat Protect Sci 11:101–103Google Scholar
  54. Papavizas GC (1985) Trichoderma and Gliocladium: biology, ecology, and potential for biocontrol. Annu Rev Phytopathol 23:23–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Poddar RK, Singh DV, Dubey SC (2004) Integrated application of Trichoderma harzianum mutants and carbendazim to manage chickpea wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris). Indian J Agric Sci 74(6):346–348Google Scholar
  56. Rawal P, Sharma P, Singh ND, Joshi A (2013) Evaluation of fungicides, neem bio-formulations and biocontrol agent for the management of root rot of safed musli caused by Rhizoctonia solani. J Mycol Plant Pathol 43(30):297Google Scholar
  57. Rhodes DJ (1996) Economics of baculovirus-insect cell production systems. Cytotechnology 20:291–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rini CR, Sulochana KK (2006) Management of seedling rots of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) using Trichoderma spp. and Pseudomonas fluorescent (Pseudomonas fluorescens). J Trop Agric 44(1–2):79–82Google Scholar
  59. Roberts DP, Lohrk SM, Meyer SL, Buyer JS, Bowers JH, Baker CJ, Chung S (2005) Biocontrol agents applied individually and in combination for suppression of soilborne diseases of cucumber. Crop Prot 24(2):141–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sharma G (1996) Studies on the integrated management of banded leaf and sheath blight of maize caused by Rhizoctonia solani, M.Sc (Ag.), thesis submitted to G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, pp 65Google Scholar
  61. Sharma P, Dureja P (2004) Evaluation of T. harzianum and T. viride isolates at BCA pathogen crop interface. J Mycol Plant Pathol 34:47–55Google Scholar
  62. Sharma P, Sain SK (2005) Use of biotic agents and abiotic compounds against damping off of cauliflower caused by Pythium aphanidermatum. Indian Phytopath 58(4):395–401Google Scholar
  63. Sharma SK., Ramesh A, Sharma MP, Joshi OP, Govaerts B, Steenwerth KL, Karlen DL (2010) Microbial community structure and diversity as indicators for evaluating soil quality. In: Biodiversity, biofuels, agroforestry and conservation agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 317–358Google Scholar
  64. Simon A, Sivasithamparam K (1989) Pathogen suppression: a case study in biological suppression of Gaeumannomyces graminis var tritici in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 21:331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Singh D, Kapur SP, Singh K (2000) Management of citrus scab caused by Elsinoe fawcettii. Indian Phytopath 53(4):461–467Google Scholar
  66. Sivan A, Chet I (1989) Degradation of fungal cell walls by lytic enzymes of Trichoderma harzianum. J Gen Microbiol 135:675–682Google Scholar
  67. Sivan ALEX, Chet ILAN (1992) Microbial control of plant diseases. Environ Microbiol:pp335–pp354Google Scholar
  68. Sivan A, Elad Y, Chet I (1984) Biological control effects of a new isolate of Trichoderma harzianum on Pythium aphanidermatum. Phytopathology 74(4):498–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tiwari AK (1996) Biological control of chick pea wilt complex using different formulations of Gliocladium virens through seed treatment. Ph.D. thesis submitted to G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, pp 167Google Scholar
  70. van der Heijden MGA, Bakker R, Verwaal J, Scheublin TR, Rutten M, Van Logtestijn R, Staehelin C (2006) Symbiotic bacteria as a determinant of plant community structure and plant productivity in dune grassland. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 56:178–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. van der Heijden MGA, Bardgett RD, Van Straalen NM (2008) The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 11:296–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Vasanthakumari MM, Shivanna MB (2013) Biological control of anthracnose of chilli with rhizosphere and rhizoplane fungal isolates from grasses. Arch Phytopathol Plant Protect 46(14):1641–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vinale F, Sivasithamparam K, Ghisalberti EL, Marra R, Woo SL, Lorito M (2008) Trichoderma–plant–pathogen interactions. Soil Biol Biochem 40(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wakelin SA, Sivasithamparam K, Cole ALJ, Skipp RA (1999) Saprophytic growth in soil of a strain of Trichoderma koningii. NZ J Agric Res 42:337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yin B, Crowley D, Sparovek G, De Melo WJ, Borneman J (2000) Bacterial functional redundancy along a soil reclamation gradient. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4361–4365CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manish Kumar
    • 1
  • Shabbir Ashraf
    • 1
  • Rizwan Ali Ansari
    • 2
  • Mohd Zuhaib
    • 1
  • Arshi Jamil
    • 1
  • Naresh Dhakar
    • 1
  • Rafeeq Kasim
    • 1
  • Amber Rizvi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural SciencesAligarh Muslim UniversityAligarhIndia
  2. 2.Section of Plant Pathology and Nematology, Department of BotanyAligarh Muslim UniversityAligarhIndia

Personalised recommendations