Advertisement

Rhizoremediation of Azodyes by Constructed Wetland Technology using Typha latifolia

  • Anju Anil Kumar
  • Dipu Sukumaran
  • Salom Gnana Thanga Vincent
Chapter

Abstract

Synthetic azodyes used in textile industries generate hazardous waste and adverse effect on soil and water, probably affects the whole environment. The traditional treatment technologies used for synthetic dyes are costly and adversely affect the biota. Phytoremediation, an arising new technology that generally uses the aquatic macrophytes to reduce, stabilize and also remove toxic pollutants in an ecofriendly and cost effective way. However, the stress on plants results in slow growth and low biomass and its rhizospheric bacteria will enhance the degradation potential and reduce the stress on plants. The chapter describes the bioremediation of azodyes by the combination of plant and root associated bacteria of Typha latifolia in constructed wetland system.

Notes

Acknowledgement

The author’s acknowledge the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, for financial support vide reference no. DST/Disha/SoRF-PM/054/2013 under Women Scientist scheme to carry out this work.

References

  1. Anjana S, Salom Gnana Thanga V (2011) Phytoremediation of synthetic textile dyes. Asian J Microbiol Biotech Environ Sci 13:30–33Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong AC (1979) Aeration in higher plants. Adv Bot Res 7:225–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chandanshivea VV, Rane NR, Tamboli AS, Gholvavec AR, Khandare RV, Govindwara SP (2017) Coplantation of aquatic macrophytes Typha angustifolia and Paspalumscrobuculatum for effective treatment of textile industry effluent. J Hazard Mater 338:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chaudhry Q, Zandstra MB, Gupta S, Joner EJ (2005) Utilizing the synergy between plants and rhizosphere microorganisms to enhance breakdown of organic pollutants in the environment ESPR. Environ Sci Pollut Res 12:34–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chequer MFD, Dorta DJ, de Oliveira DP (2011) Azo dyes and their metabolites: does the discharge of the azo dye into water bodies represent human and ecological risks. In: Hauser P (ed) Advances in treating textile effluent. IntechOpen, London, pp 27–48Google Scholar
  6. Cluis C (2004) Junk-greedy greens: phytoremediation as a new option for soil decontamination. Environ Teach J 2:61–67Google Scholar
  7. Dipu S, Kumar AA, Gnana S, Thanga V (2011) Phytoremediation of dairy effluent by constructed wetland technology. Environmentalist 31:263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garg A, Krishna Bhat L, Charles Bock W (2002) Mutagenicity of aminoazobenzene dyes and related structures: a QSAR/QPAR investigation. Dyes Pigments 55:35–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gayathri S, Saravanan D, Radhakrishnan M, Balagurunathan R, Kathiresan K (2010) Bioprospecting potential of fast growing endophytic bacteria from leaves of mangrove and salt marsh plant species. Indian J Biotechnol 9:397–402Google Scholar
  10. Haberl R, Grego S, Langergraber G, Kadlec RH (2003) Constructed wetlands for the treatment of organic pollutants. Artic J Soils Sediments 3:109–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hadad HR, Maine MA, Bonetto CA (2006) Macrophyte growth in a pilot-scale constructed wetland for industrial wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 63:1744–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hiltner L (1904) Uberneuere Erfahrungen und Probleme auf dem Gebieteder Bodenbakteriologie unterbessonderer Beru¨cksichtigungder Grundung und Brache. Arb Dtsch Landwirtsch Ges Berl 98:59–78Google Scholar
  13. IARC monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans (1982) Chemicals, industrial processes and industries associated with cancer in humans. Lyon Suppl 4:1–292Google Scholar
  14. Jaya Santha Kumari H, Krishnamoorthy P, Arumugam TK (2015) Removal of rhodamine B from aqueous solution by activated carbon prepared from the natural plant Typha latifolia by adsorption: kinetic and isotherm studies. Int J Chem Tech Res 7(7):2867–2874Google Scholar
  15. Jayanthy V, Geetha R, Rajendran R, Prabhavathi P, Karthik Sundaram S, Dinesh Kumar S, Santhanam (2014) Phytoremediation of dye contaminated soil by Leucaenaleucocephala (subabul) seed and growth assessment of vigna radiata in the remediated soil. Saudi J Biol Sci 21:324–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jenssen PD, Maehlum T, Krogstad (1993) Potential use of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatments in northern environments. Water Sci Technol 28:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khandare RV, Govindwar SP (2015) Research review paper phytoremediation of textile dyes and effluents: current scenario and future prospects. Biotechnol Adv 33:1697–1714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Khandare RV, Kabra AN, Kurade MB, Govindwar SP (2011) Phytoremediation potential of Portulaca grandiflora Hook. (Moss-Rose) in degrading a sulfonated diazo reactive dye Navy Blue HE2R (reactive Blue 172). Bioresour Technol 102:6774–6777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khandare RV, Rane NR, Waghmode TR, Govindwar SP (2012) Bacterial assisted phytoremediation for enhanced degradation of highly sulfonated diazo reactive dye. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:1709–1718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khandare R, Kabra A, Kadam A, Govindwar S (2013) Treatment of dye containing wastewaters by a developed lab scale phytoreactor and enhancement of its efficiency by bacterial augmentation. Int Bio Deterior Bidegrad 78:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kharub M (2012) Use of various technologies, methods and adsorbents for the removal of dye. J Environ Res Dev 6:879–883Google Scholar
  22. Kvet J, Dusek J, Husak S (1999) Vascular plants suitable for wastewater treatment in temperate zones. Nutrient cycling and retention in natural and constructed wetlands. Conference paper, pp 101–110Google Scholar
  23. Li M, Zhou Q, Tao M, Wang Y, Jiang L, Wu Z (2010) Comparative study of microbial community structure in different filter media of constructed wetland. J Environ Sci 22:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ma Y, Prasad M, Rajkumar M, Freitas H (2011) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and endophytes accelerate phytoremediation of metalliferous soils. Biotechnology 29:248–258Google Scholar
  25. Neppolian B, Sakthivel S, Banumathi Arbbindoo, Palanichamy M, Murugesan V (1998) Photocatalytic degradation of textile dye commonly used in cotton fabrics. Recent Adv Basic Appl Asp Ind Catal 113:329–335Google Scholar
  26. Nilratnisakorn S, Thiravetyan P, Nakbanpote W (2008) Synthetic reactive dye wastewater treatment by narrow-leaved cattail. J Energy Environ 9:231–252Google Scholar
  27. Nilsson R, Nordlinder R, Wass U, Meding B, Belin L (1993) Asthma, rhinitis, and dermatitis in workers exposed to reactive dyes. Br J Ind Med 50:65–70PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. NTP (2005) Technical report on the toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of malachite green chloride and leucomalachite green: national toxicology program. US Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle ParkGoogle Scholar
  29. Nwoko CO (2010) Trends in phytoremediation of toxic elemental and organic pollutants. Afr J Biotechnol 9:6010–6016Google Scholar
  30. Olejnik D, Wojciechowski K (2012) Conception of constructed wetland for dyes removal in water solutions. Chemik 66:611–614Google Scholar
  31. Patil P, Neetin S, Govindwar A, Jadhav JP, Bapat V (2009) Degradation analysis of Reactive Red 198 by hairy roots of Tagetespatula L. (Marigold). Planta 230:725–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Patil SM, Chandanshive VV, Rane NR, Khandare RV, Watharkar AD, Govindwar SP (2016) Bioreactor with Ipomoea hederifolia adventitious roots and its endophyte Cladosporium cladosporioides for textile dye degradation. Environ Res 146:340–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pilon SE (2005) Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56:15–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pilon-Smits EAH, John LF (2006) Environmental cleanup using plants: biotechnological advances and ecological considerations. Front Ecol Environ 4:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Platzek T, Lang C, Grohmann G, Baltes W (1999) Formation of a carcinogenic aromatic amine from an azo dye by human skin bacteria in vitro. Hum Exp Toxicol 18:552–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Prasad R, Kumar M, Varma A (2015) Role of PGPR in soil fertility and plant health plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and medicinal plants. Soil Biol 383:42–48Google Scholar
  37. Pundlik W, Krishnamurthy R, Varsadia M (2013) Removal of dye effluent by different aquatic plant in Kadodara region by rhizofilteration technique. J Sci Res Pharm 2:1–5Google Scholar
  38. Saba B, Madeeha J, Azeem K, Irfan A, Ann DC (2015) Effectiveness of Rice Agricultural waste, microbes and wetland plants in the removal of Reactive black-5 azodye in microcosm constructed wetlands. Int J Phytoremediation 7:1060–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sánchez-Orozco R, Martínez-Juan M, García-Sánchez JJ, Ureña-Núñez F (2018) Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution using Typha stems and leaves. BioResources 13(1):1696–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sanmuga Priya E, Senthamil Selvan P (2017) Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipus) – an efficient and economic adsorbent for textile effluent treatment – a review. Arab J Chem 10:S3548–S3558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sculthorpe CD (1967) The biology of aquatic vascular plants. Arnold Publishers, London, pp 1–610Google Scholar
  42. Shafqat M, Khalid A, Mahmood T, Siddique MT, Han J-I, Habteselassie MY (2017) Evaluation of bacteria isolated from textile wastewater and rhizosphere to simultaneously degrade azo dyes and promote plant growth. J Chem Technol:1–38Google Scholar
  43. Shah K (2014) Biodegradation of azo dyes compound. Int Res J Biochem Biotechnol 1:5–13Google Scholar
  44. Sharma KP, Sharma K, kumar S, Sharma S, Grover R, Soni P, Bharadwal SM, Chaturvedi RK, Sharma S (2005) Response of selected aquatic macrophytes towards textile dye waste water. Indian J Biotechnol 4:538–545Google Scholar
  45. Sharma S, Kalpana A, Shweta SV, Singh P (2007) Toxicity assessment of textile dye wastewater using swiss albino rats. Aust J Ecotoxicol 13:81–85Google Scholar
  46. Shehzadi M, Afzal M, Khan MU, Islam E, Mobin A, Anwar S, Khan QM (2014) Enhanced degradation of textile effluent in constructed wetland system using Typhadomingensis and textile effluent-degrading endophytic bacteria. Water Res 58:152–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shehzadi M, Fatima K, Imran A, Mirza MS, Khan QM, Afzal M (2015) Ecology of bacterial endophytes associated with wetland plants growing in textile effluent for pollutant-degradation and plant growth-promotion potentials. Plant Biosyst 150:1261–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Srivastava S, Singh N, Srivastava A, Sinha R (1995) Acute toxicity of malachite green and its effects on certain blood parameters of a catfish, Heteropneustes fossilis. Aquat Toxicol 31:241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tan K, Morad N, Ooi JQ (2016) Phytoremediation of methylene blue and methyl orange using Eichhornia crassipus. Int J Environ Sci Dev 7:724–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vymazal J, Lenkropfelova (2008) Wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands with horizontal sub-surface flow. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wallance S, Nivala J, Meyers T (2008) Statistical analysis of treatment performance in aerated and non-aerated subsurface flow constructed wetlands. pp 171–180Google Scholar
  52. Wang Z, Xue M, Huang K, Liu Z (2011) Textile dyeing wastewater treatment. In: Advances in treating textile effluent, pp 91–116Google Scholar
  53. Watharkar A, Niraj RR, Swapnil MP, Rahul VK, Jyoti PJ (2013) Enhanced phyto transformation of Navy Blue RX dye by Petunia grandiflora J uss. with augmentation of rhizospheric Bacillus pumilus strain PgJ and subsequent toxicity analysis. Bioresour Technol 142:246–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yasar A, Khan M, Tabinda AB, Hayyat MU, Zaheer A (2013) Percentage uptake of heavy metals of different macrophytes in stagnant and flowing textile effluent. J Anim Plant Sci 23:1709–1713Google Scholar
  55. Zhang D, Gersberg RM, Keat TS (2009) Constructed wetlands in China. Ecol Eng 35:1367–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anju Anil Kumar
    • 1
  • Dipu Sukumaran
    • 2
  • Salom Gnana Thanga Vincent
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of KeralaThiruvananthapuramIndia
  2. 2.Centre for Water Resources Development and ManagementKozhikodeIndia

Personalised recommendations