Advertisement

Implications of the Circular Economy for Electronic Products

  • Christian ClemmEmail author
  • Nils F. Nissen
  • Karsten Schischke
  • Gergana Dimitrova
  • Max Marwede
  • Klaus-Dieter Lang
Chapter

Abstract

The circular economy concept of the European Union aims to save energy and material resources while minimizing resource risks and giving the EU a competitive advantage in economic terms. This paper explores the implications of the circular economy for electronic products by analyzing design aspects such as durability, reparability, reusability, remanufacturing, as well as plastic recycling and the application of recycled plastics in new products. This involves both reviewing how those aspects are finding their way into new requirements under the EU Ecodesign Directive and highlighting select activities in the research landscape and on company level.

Keywords

Circular economy Ecodesign Directive Electronic products 

References

  1. 1.
    European Commission. Closing the loop–An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. Communication of the European Commission, Brussels. 2015. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0614.
  2. 2.
    European Commission. Report on critical raw materials for the EU, Brussels. 2014. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/raw-materials/specific-interest/critical_de.
  3. 3.
    Council Directive 2009/125/EC of October 2009 on establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products (recast).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Geerken T, Kazmierczyk P. More from less – material resource efficiency in Europe–2015 overview of policies, instruments and targets in 32 countries. Luxembourg: European Environment Agency; 2016.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cucchiella F, D’Adamo I, Koh L, Rosa P. Recycling of WEEEs: An economic assessment of present and future e-waste streams. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2015;51(2015):163–272.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schischke, K. Product design for the efficient use of critical materials–The case of mobile information technology devices, ESM workshop at World Resources Forum. Davos. 2015. Available: http://www.esmfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Schischke_Modularity_13102015.pdf.
  7. 7.
    Proske M, Clemm C, Richter N. Life cycle assessment of the fairphone 2. 2016. Available: https://www.fairphone.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Fairphone_2_LCA_Final_20161122.pdf.
  8. 8.
    Umweltbundesamt, ongoing research, Strengthening of resource efficiency and waste minimization in product policy instruments, project number 3714 95 3070.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    EC. Draft regulation–ecodesign requirements for electronic displays. European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy, Brussels. 2016. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/initiatives/ares-2016-7108187_en.
  10. 10.
    Maya-Drysdale L, Peled M, Wood J, Rames M, Viegand J. Preparatory study on the Review of Regulation 617/2013 (Lot 3) computers and computer servers–Task 7.1 report: Presentation of policy measures–Final version for consultation. 2017. Available: https://computerregulationreview.eu/documents.
  11. 11.
    Berwald A, Faninger T, Bayramoglu S, Tinetti B, Mudgal S, Stobbe L, Nissen N. Ecodesign preparatory study on enterprise servers and data equipment–ENTR Lot 9. Brussels: European Commission; 2015.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 60529:1989+AMD1:1999+AMD2:2013 CSV–Consolidated version–Degrees of protection provided by enclosures (IP Code). 2013.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Commission Regulation (EU) No 666/2013. Implementing Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for vacuum cleaners. 2013. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32013R0666&from=EN.
  14. 14.
    Marwede M, Clemm C, Dimitrova G, Tecchio P, Ardente F, Mathieux F. Analysis of material efficiency aspects of personal computers product group–Technical support for Environmental Footprinting, material efficiency in product policy and the European Platform on LCA, EUR 28394 EN. 2017. doi  https://doi.org/10.2788/89220.
  15. 15.
    Sitek J, Koscielski M, Dawidowicz P, Ciszewski P, Khramova M, Nguyen Quang D, Martinez S. Investigations of temperature resistance of memory BGA components during multi-reflow processes for Circular Economy applications, EMPC 2017–21st European Microelectronics and Packaging Conference; 2017 Sept 10–13; Warsaw. 2017.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Labs L. Frische USB-Sticks mit alten Daten. Germany: Heise Online; 2017. Available: https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Frische-USB-Sticks-mit-alten-Daten-3716992.html Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Circular Devices Oy. PuzzleCluster: the first reuse application of the PuzzlePhone. 2015. Available: http://www.puzzlephone.com/blog-read/.
  18. 18.
    Peeters J, Vanegas P, Tange L, Van Houwelingen J, Duflou J. Closed loop recycling of plastics containing Flame Retardants. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2014;84(2014):35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Köhnlechner R. Erzeugung sauberer PS- und ABS-Fraktionen aus gemischtem Elektronikschrott. Berliner Recycling- und Rohstoffkonferenz. 2014. Available: http://www.vivis.de/phocadownload/Download/2014_rur/2014_RuR_379_400_Koehnlechner.pdf.
  20. 20.
    Schlummer M, Popp L, Trautmann F, Mäurer A. Recovery of bromine and antimony from WEEE plastics, Electronics Goes Green 2016+; 2016 Sept 7–9; Berlin. 2016.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dender L, Rifer W. iNEMI repair and recycling metrics project–end of project report. 2015. Available: http://thor.inemi.org/webdownload/2015/Repair_Recycling_Metrics_EOP_Report_072915.pdf.
  22. 22.
    EPEAT. EPEAT criteria–imaging equipment. 2017. Available: http://www.epeat.net/resources/criteria-2/.
  23. 23.
    TCO. TCO Certified Edge Display 2.0. TCO Development, Stockholm. 2014. Available: http://tcocertified.com/files/2014/04/140401_TCO-Certified-Edge-Displays-2-0_final-version.pdf.
  24. 24.
    European Commission (2015) on a standardisation request to the European standardisation organisations as regards ecodesign requirements on material efficiency aspects for energy-related products in support of the implementation of Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Available: ftp://ftp.cencenelec.eu/CENELEC/EuropeanMandates/M543_EN.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Clemm
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Nils F. Nissen
    • 1
  • Karsten Schischke
    • 1
  • Gergana Dimitrova
    • 1
  • Max Marwede
    • 1
    • 2
  • Klaus-Dieter Lang
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department Environmental and Reliability EngineeringFraunhofer-Institut für Zuverlässigkeit und Mikrointegration IZMBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Technische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations