Proposal of the Index of Environmental Burden and Health Information

  • Yasuko WatanabeEmail author
  • Yuna Seo
  • Kiyoshi Dowaki


The current agricultural product would cause the global warming problem, because the much of chemical fertilizer and the longer transportation should be required. This means that the visualization of eco-burden on basis of LCA might play an important role. That is, due to the suitable index, the consumer and/or supplier can understand environmental performances. In general, the consumer would pay attention to the cost and/or nutrient contents besides eco-burden. Under this circumstance, the multiple indices by which various preferences are identified are useful. In this paper, the multiple indices are proposed to develop the sustainable agricultural products which contribute to the abatement of eco-burden. This index consists of CO2 equivalent emissions, food miles, nutritional quality, food safety and taste. Here, using leaf lettuce cultivated in the open air or the greenhouse as an example, the multiple indices with a symbol mark for identifying various preferences are proposed.


Life cycle assessment Multiple indices 


  1. 1.
    Environmental management The ISO 14000 family of International Standards. Accessed 21 June 2017.
  2. 2.
    EPD the international EPD system: Environmental product declaration Valfrutta. Accessed 22 June 2017.
  3. 3.
    EPD the international EPD system; Granarolo organic soy drink. Accessed 22 June 2017.
  4. 4.
    EPD the international EPD system; ASSOMELA Italian apple. Accessed 22 June 2017.
  5. 5.
    National Institute for Environmental Studies. Greenhouse gas inventory office Japan Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report (NIR); 2017.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare; survey commissioned by Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in 2014.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kagome Co., Ltd. Accessed 7 June 2017.
  8. 8.
    Consumer Agency; Food label standard rule. Accessed 7 June 2017.
  9. 9.
    United States Department of Agriculture; Dietary Guidelines—1985.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nihei N. A study of amino acids absorption and metabolism by some plants. Fukushima prefecture agricultural research center research report; 2010. p. 63–87.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Horiuchi K. On intensive cultivation of crops and maintenance of sustainable ground forces. Jpn J Crop Sci. 2001;70(2):143–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Co., Ltd. Otsuka House. Accessed 20 June 2017.
  13. 13.
    Co., Ltd. Marinex. Accessed 20 June 2017.
  14. 14.
    Co., Ltd. yoshino sekkouhanbai. Accessed 20 June 2017.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Weber CL, Matthews HS. Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:3508–13. Accessed 23 June 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yoshikawa N, Amano K, Shimada K. Quantitative evaluation on environmental burden in vegetable production/transport process. Environ Syst Res Paper. 2006;34:245–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union L364/5-24. 2006.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Japan Food Standard Table, Chapter 2, 6. Vegetables. 2015.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ministry of Agriculture. Accessed 23 June 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial AdministrationTokyo University of ScienceNoda, TokyoJapan
  2. 2.Eco Research CenterEcoDesign Co., Ltd.TsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations