Advertisement

Component Recoverability Analysis in Product Design Using System Dynamic Modelling

  • Novita SakundariniEmail author
  • Nur Safieza Riwayat
  • Christina May May Chin
  • Eng Hwa Yap
  • Raja Ariffin Raja Ghazilla
  • Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid
Chapter

Abstract

The fundamental objective of the research is to develop a system that analyses component recoverability at the product design stage using two separate tools, namely, a system dynamic model (SDM) and the recoverability factor formula. Engineers can utilise both the SDM and recoverability factor formula at the design stage to develop eco-friendly products. Both the SDM and the recoverability factor enable engineers to optimise their products from the resource recovery perspective. The SDM built using Vensim PLE provides a visual representation of the resource and energy consumptions and financial aspects of the component production, recovery, and disposal. The recoverability factor measures various aspects of the product design from a static standpoint by examining the product’s physical design which includes material compatibility, disassembly complexity, geometric positioning of each component, time taken for disassembly, depth factor, generic factor through Standard Component Index (SCI), and energy consumption improvement (ECI). The novelty of this research is that it has two different aspects to it. The recoverability factor provides with an index to measure how recoverable the product is, regardless of the cost or end-of-life (EOL) strategies. The SDM provides a clear view of how sustainable the design is over time with consideration of not just the environmental effect but also the financial impact on the manufacturer. The recoverability factor is generic and can be used for any types of product made from any materials in any industry, whereas precedent studies focused more on specific products, e.g. automotive, footwear, and electronic and electrical equipment (EEE).

Keywords

Recoverability System dynamics Standard Component Index Energy consumption ecodesign 

References

  1. 1.
    EU. Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products. Off J Eur Union. 2009;285:52.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    EU. Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 18 September 2000 on end-of life vehicles. Off J Eur Union. 2000;L269:34–42.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    EU. Directive 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament and the council of 27 January 2003 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). Off J Eur Union. 2003;L037:24–39.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ijomah W, McMahon C, Hammond G, Newman S. Development of robust design-for-remanufacturing guidelines to further the aims of sustainable development. Int J Prod Res. 2007;45(18):4513–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tojo N, Fischer C, Saki O. Europe as a recycling society. European recycling policies in relation to the actual recycling achieved. In: European topic Centre on sustainable consumption and production, Copenhagen. København: European Environment Agency; 2011.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gungor A, Gupta M. Issues in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: a survey. Comput Ind Eng. 1999;36:811–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tonnelier P, Millet D, Richir S, Lecoq M. Is it possible to evaluate the recovery potential earlier in the design process? Proposal of a qualitative tool. J Eng Des. 2005;16(3):297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheung W, Marsh R, Griffin P, Newnes L, Mileham A, Lanham J. Towards a cleaner production: a roadmap for predicting product end-of-life costs at early design concept. J Clean Prod. 2015;87:431–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown S, Steinstra S, Ludvigsen K. Closing the loop: the car recycling challenge. London: Euromotor Reports Limited; 1993. p. 236.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zumbroch P, Kiefer B. Design for Recycling. Bedfordshire: GM Technical Development Report; 1994.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhou M, Caudil R, Sebastian D, Zhang B. Multi-lifecycle product recovery for electronic products. J Electron Manuf. 1999;9(01):1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fang H, Ong S, Nee A. Product Remanufacturability assessment and implementation based on design features. Procedia CIRP. 2015;26:571–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sakundarini N, Taha Z, Ghazilla R, Abdul-Rashid S. A methodology for optimising modular design and considering product end of life strategies. Int J Precis Eng Manuf. 2015;16(11):2359–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Staikos T, Rahimifard S. An end-of-life decision support tool for product recovery considerations in the footwear industry. Int J Precis Eng Manuf. 2007;20(6):602–15.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berzi L, Delogu M, Pierini M, Romoli F. Evaluation of the end-of-life performance of a hybrid scooter with the application of recyclability and recoverability assessment methods. J Resour Conserv Recycl. 2016;108:140–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    United States Environmental Protection Agency. Advancing sustainable materials management: 2013 fact sheet, assessing trends in material generation, recycling and disposal in the United States: 2013. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 2015.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    The Economist. The truth about recycling. The Economist. 7 June 2007. http://www.economist.com/node/9249262. Accessed 16 April 2017.
  18. 18.
    Kazmeyer M. How much energy does recycling save? SFGATE. http://homeguides.sfgate.com/much-energy-recycling-save-79720.html. Accessed 1 April 2017.
  19. 19.
    PSSI/Stanford Recycling, Land, Buildings and Real Estate, "Frequently Asked Questions: Benefits of Recycling." Stanford University. https://lbre.stanford.edu/pssistanford-recycling/frequently-asked-questions/frequently-asked-questions-benefits-recycling. Accessed 1 April 2017.
  20. 20.
    United States Environmental Protection Agency. Individual waste reduction model (iWARM) tool. Washington, DC: EPA; 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Novita Sakundarini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nur Safieza Riwayat
    • 1
  • Christina May May Chin
    • 1
  • Eng Hwa Yap
    • 2
  • Raja Ariffin Raja Ghazilla
    • 3
  • Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing EngineeringUniversity of NottinghamSemenyihMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Transdisciplinary InnovationUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty EngineeringUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations