Scientific vs. Public Attention: A Comparison of Top Cited Papers in WoS and Top Papers by Altmetric Score
Alternative metrics or altmetrics are article level metrics that have been used to quantify the attention given to scholarly papers in online fora or social media. In a way it was sought to replace journal level metrics such as the Impact Factor and also to see if altmetric scores could predict highly cited papers. Early studies, done soon after altmetrics was proposed in 2010, were somewhat premature as the use of social media was not widely prevalent, and their results may no longer be relevant at the present time when use levels have risen significantly. In 2016, Altmetric.com has tracked over 17 million mentions of 2.7 million different research outputs. Of these, the top 100 most-discussed journal articles of 2016 were presented with details of journals in which the research was published, affiliations of authors, fields, countries, etc. Our attempt is to obtain a bibliometric profile of these papers with high altmetric scores to see the underlying patterns and characteristics that motivate high public attention. In parallel we have analyzed top 100 highly cited papers from the same year. Our objective in this empirical study is to examine the similarities and distinguishing features of scientific attention as measured by citations and public attention in online fora.
A significant finding is that there is very little overlap between very highly cited papers and those that received the highest altmetric scores.
KeywordsAltmetrics Social media Impact analysis Web of science Science Citation Index-Expanded
- 1.Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., Neylon, C.: Altmetrics: A manifesto (2010). http://altmetrics.org/manifesto
- 2.Kim, H.S.: Attractability and virality: The role of message features and social influence in health news diffusion. University of Pennsylvania (2014)Google Scholar
- 4.Priem, J.: Altmetrics. Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact, journal? 263–88 (2014)Google Scholar
- 5.Wouters P., Costas, R.: Users, Narcissism and Control – Tracking the Impact of Scholarly Publications in the 21st Century. Image Rochester, New York (2012)Google Scholar
- 7.Roemer, R.C., Borchardt, R.: Introduction to Altmetrics. Libr. Tehnol. Reports 51(5), 5–10 (2015)Google Scholar
- 8.Bar-Ilan, J., Haustein, S., Peters, I., Priem, J., Shema, H., Terliesner, J.: Beyond citations: Scholars’ visibility on the social web. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (2012). http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.5611/
- 12.Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., Wouters, P.: How well developed are Altmetrics? Cross disciplinary analysis of the presence of “alternative metrics” in scientific publications (RIP). In: Proceedings of the 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, Vienna, Austria, pp. 876–884. Facultas Verlags und Buchhandels, Wien (2013)Google Scholar
- 21.Haustein, S., Thelwall, M., Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C.R.: On the relation between altmetrics and citations in medicine (RIP). In: Hinze, S., Lottmann, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI), Berlin, Germany, pp. 164–166, 4–6 September 2013Google Scholar