How Do Scholars Evaluate and Promote Research Outputs? An NTU Case Study
- 260 Downloads
Academic scholars have begun to use diverse social media tools to disseminate and evaluate research outputs. Altmetrics which are indices based on social media, have emerged in recent years and have received attention from scholars from a variety of research areas. This case study aims to investigate how researchers at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) promote their research outputs and how they conduct research evaluation. We conducted semi-structured interviews with eighteen NTU researchers. Results from the study show that NTU researchers still prefer traditional metrics such as citation count, journal impact factor (JIF) and h-index for their research evaluation. They find these metrics are essential determinants to identify the quality of a research paper. In terms of altmetrics, most NTU researchers interviewed are aware of them, but have not yet used them in research evaluation. Furthermore, we found that the main methods used to promote research outputs are attending academic conferences and publishing papers in journals. However, NTU researchers also embark on using social networking sites to disseminate new findings. The results of this study contribute to the previous literature to help understand how social media and altmetrics are influencing the traditional methods of promoting and evaluating research outputs in academia.
KeywordsSocial media Traditional metrics Altmetrics Research evaluation
This research is supported by the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore under its Science of Research, Innovation and Enterprise programme (SRIE Award No. NRF2014-NRF-SRIE001-019). Also, we would like to acknowledge and thank all our interview participants, who kindly volunteered their time and professional opinions to our study.
- 4.Harley, D., Acord, S.K., Earl-Novell, S., Lawrence, S., King, C.J.: Assessing the future landscape of scholarly communication: an exploration of faculty values and needs in seven disciplines. Final Report. Center for Studies in Higher Education. University of California, Berkley, CA (2010)Google Scholar
- 5.Weller, K.: Social media and altmetrics: an overview of current alternative approaches to measuring scholarly impact. In: Incentives and Performance, pp. 261–276 (2015)Google Scholar
- 9.Haustein, S., Siebenlist, T.: Applying social bookmarking data to evaluate journal usage. J. Informetr. 5(3), 446–457 (2011)Google Scholar
- 12.Loach, T.V., Evans, T.S.: Ranking journals using altmetrics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.00451 (2015)
- 17.Thelwall, M.: A brief history of altmetrics. Res. Trends 37, 3–4 (2014)Google Scholar